Flame retardant: SRO trumps most mansions in smoke safety

With more than 150 solar and hot water heating panels on the roof and a high-tech security system featuring live video feeds of all public spaces, the formerly homeless and low-income residents of The Crossings, the new SRO, or "single room occupancy," will experience plenty of impressive residential gadgets. But the most significant technology at the 60-unit complex at the corner of Fourth Street and Preston Avenue will give those living there one priceless advantage over even most mansion dwellers: they're less likely to experience a fatal fire at home, thanks to a multi-faceted fire-suppression system and the use of smoke-savvy photoelectric smoke detectors.

"We use them because they eliminate nuisance alarms," says Skip Hannan of Mechums River Security Concepts, the company that installed the fire protection system at the $6.6-million-dollar development.

Avoiding false alarms is only one benefit of photoelectrics. As longtime readers of the Hook know, there are two types of smoke detectors, and they're not created equal. Ionization detectors, the kind found in the vast majority of American homes, use a small amount of radioactive material to detect the large particles released by live flames. They're prone to false alarms, leading residents to disable them. By contrast, photoelectric detectors use a beam of light that triggers the alarm when small particles of smoke interrupt the beam.

Back in 2009, the Hook, with the assistance of the Albemarle Fire Department and Jay Fleming, a Boston fire official and the country's leading proponent of photoelectric technology, conducted a smoke detector test that supported Fleming's long-held contention: ionization detectors don't detect smoke.

"They're fire detectors," Fleming explained, after they failed to sound in our test, even when smoke filled the room to the point that oxygen masks had to be donned.

Although Fleming's data has convinced state lawmakers around the country to support legislation requiring photoelectric-only detectors– Vermont and Massachusetts were early adopters– and the International Association of Fire Fighters changed its position in summer 2010 to endorse photoelectrics, Charlottesville-area fire officials say they remain unconvinced. Both Charlottesville and Albemarle County fire departments issue combination detectors, which contain both components.

"We believe that is the best practice," says Albemarle Chief Dan Eggleston, echoing the opinion of Charlottesville Chief Charles Werner. Both men cite the endorsement of combination detectors by the International Association of Fire Chiefs and the National Fire Protection Association.

While Fleming asserts that an increased risk of false alarms with combination detectors remains, Charlottesville's Fire Chief Charles Werner says the city-issued combination detectors, given out through the free smoke detector program, come equipped with a 10-year nonremovable battery, hopefully solving that problem. Fleming, however, has pointed out that a resident who becomes truly irritated by false alarms could still easily rip it from the wall or ceiling.

Fortunately for any heavy smokers at the Crossings, the facility is also equipped with heat detectors, a sprinkler system, and automatic fire extinguishers over every stove. Given that residents will be permitted to smoke in their studios– and that dropped cigarettes are a leading cause of smoldering fires– the full fire suppression system should ensure that if a fire ever does break out, it won't spread far.

The fire systems aren't the only cutting-edge technology at the complex constructed by Martin Horn, as dozens of solar and hot water panels cover the roof, something that will offset the energy expense and help defray the estimated $300,000 cost of the innovative heating system.

Thirty of the 60 units are filled by formerly homeless individuals, who were selected based on their vulnerability, with factors including age and illness moving them up the application list. No one convicted of a violent crime is permitted at the facility, and overnight guests are also prohibited from the premises. These residents will pay a minimum of $50 a month rent. The other 30 low income residents will pay market value– $550-600 a month, which includes all utilities except cable television and phone.

A grand opening for the Crossings will be held on Tuesday, April 10.

Read more on: smoke detectorsSRO

15 comments

Now all these drunks needs is Obamacare to get free vicodin to trade for booze and ciagarettes and they wil have it better than a UVA grad.....

Mr. Marshall must not realize that housing the chronically homeless and most vulnerable among us is not only a compassionate way to live in this community, but also saves him money, by keeping these folks out of the emergency department as often, which will also reduce waiting times in the ER.

Every time I see bill marshall post I wonder if he is the same bill marshall who is a lawyer downtown. The SRO housing is a very good thing for our community and I think it's f*&king awesome that it is solar and hi tech!!!! The city should get MAJOR props for that. I'm seriously impressed.

Bill and I rarely agree on anything and it's probably a reach to say we agree on this...however, I see his point. I think the question is whether or not we are simply enabling many of these people to live this lifestyle. While I'm sure many of the homeless are unable to work due to physical or mental disabilities, it seems that many of the folks I see on the street could be better served by a stint in detox and a job finding service than a hand-out. I am a very compassionate and generous man, but I won't be an easy mark.

I am not compassionate.
@bill marshall, they don't need Obamacare. They already have mdicaid.
@Gail Hyder Wiley "...but also saves him money, by keeping these folks out of the emergency department as often, which will also reduce waiting times in the ER." Putting them in the Crossings will not keep them out of anywhere. Having an apartment has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not a person uses the ER or not. This is a myth repeated over and over by "advocates," usually those who are making money "helping the poor." They are called poverty pimps. If somebody gets drunk and cracks his head, or get cut in a fight, he will go to the emergency room no matter where it happens. I know proponents have talked about studies, but the results and conclusions are bogus and do not reflect common sense. They act as if each homeless person goes to the hospital everyday.
Since the City is now paying the federal government's portion of the Section 8 vouchers being used by the subsidized residents and the City is allowing VSH to use the $1.55M property rent free for decades, it is costing the tax payers of Charlottesville plenty. Nothing is free. If any of you think so, I understand there are still vacancies so you ought to apply for a unit.

Cville Eye, just going with common sense here. I'll spare you the studies. Who has better odds of getting their feet on the ground: someone with a roof over his head, a shower, a small kitchen, and a case worker to go to for support, or someone out on the streets? How do you fill out a job application without a phone number? How do you build a routine in life with no locational stability? Your comment is based on the assumption that the situation of homelessness will never change. For some this is true (and is making life a little more bearable for them such a bad thing?), but others can eventually become productive members of society. We all have an interest in moving people from net-losses to the public to net-gains. Anyway, what's the alternative? Send them to Richmond? They are afforded certain Constitutional rights like anyone else.

60 units, half to be filled with people who have the income to pay rent, the other half going to chronic homeless, and you better believe those folks will have to jump through some hoops to get 1 of only 30 spots. Overall I'd say you won't see much of a difference on the street, a large percentage of homeless don't want anything to do with a structured environment with rules, no way.

@New Reality, I think you think I'm saying something that I am not saying. I was simply giving facts that many in the public do not know. I was not giving my opinion. Now I will. "Who has better odds of getting their feet on the ground: someone with a roof over his head, a shower, a small kitchen, and a case worker to go to for support, or someone out on the streets? " The vast majority of the homeless started out with these things: they started out in a home.However they took different paths. It depends upon whether that person is chronically homeless and has been traveling down the same path for decades or recently homeless having fallen upon hard times, recently become mentally ill and will accept treatment or recently released from jail and does not want to go back.
"How do you fill out a job application without a phone number?" That was the purpose of that yellow house in the 100 block of 4th ST NW (right up the street from the Crossings in the block off W. Main).
"Your comment is based on the assumption that the situation of homelessness will never change." No, it depends mainly upon the character of that particular person. Homelessness for most people is temporary and they "eventually become productive members of society.".
"We all have an interest in moving people from net-losses to the public to net-gains. Anyway, what's the alternative? Send them to Richmond? They are afforded certain Constitutional rights like anyone else." We can't move people and we can not move them to Richmond Constitutionally. People move themselves. We can provide some of the things that will enable them to travel the road they choose. Most of the chronically homeless have worked with a dozen agencies, have had some form of job training, job counseling or other educational program, and have had liberal access to counseling and mental health services. They have chosen to travel down the same path as they have in getting to where they are now and have remained chronically homeless. What's the difference between them and the homeless who are working, connecting with society and stabilizing their lives? The answer is inside. The apartment is not a magic wand. This is my opinion.

Look the simple facts are that they spent 6.7 MILLION dollars on 60 rooms the size of a hotel room. They put in solar panels with no rtrack record of reliability and all kinds of other fancy stuff. It was WRONG to waste that money on frills. They could have bought a 100 acre farm for 1 million built an airplane hanger size building for 1 milion and housed 500 homeless.

They would have had 4 million left over for cows chickens seed and tractors and a bus to get people to C-ville to work.

This is nothing more than a liberal feel good solution that RAPES the taxpayers, will create maybe ten success stories and give 50 drunks a crash pad.

I am not against helping people who want to better themselves, I am against blowing 6.7 million dollars on 60 people. (not to mention the lost revenue from the property taxes that would have been 400k a year if retail condos had been built instead. That makes the cities TRUE anual subsidy 640k ni the 240k they claim That is over 20 grand perhomelss person for their 30 rooms.

This is WHY we are broke as a nation. We pay 100 times too much for everything and people just line up for ther share.

And I am not a lawyer. Just a working stiff.

Not bad..Only $110K upfront per bum and what are the carrying costs to be.
They sure are going to need all that fire prevention equipment what with a building full of chain-smoking alcoholics, most of whom will be "ambulatory" mentally ill as well.
Time for Reids to enlarge their Thunderbird and "foadies" dept
Wouldn't it be a kick to prohibit smoking on the premises.

@bill marshall,The City did NOT spend $6.7M on this project. Virginia Supportive Housing did. The City spent $1.55M to buy the land. Since VSH is not in the cattle business I see no reason why they need to buy cows or chickens either for that matter. Since there are hundreds of condos already on the market or are planned for the market in the near future, I see no need to build more and I guess VSH doesn't either.

@Cville Eye, oh, but they are in the cattle business. They are herding them from the downtown mall to their new corral at 4th & Preston.

Seriously Hook, enough with the photoelectric smoke detectors. You devote like three paragraphs to fire suppression in articles that are only tangentially related. We get it, we all get it.