Call dropped: Embarq loses wireless customers

news-embarqThe Embarq brand lasted approximately three years.

As Embarq readies to merge with CenturyTel to become a new landline-based company, it won't be taking some of its customers with it. Embarq wireless subscribers recently received letters and text messages that as of October 1, the company will no longer provide cell phone service.

The trend seems to be more and more phone users ditch landlines to go solely cellphone. Is Embarq-soon-to-be CenturyLink bucking conventional wisdom when it jettisons wireless to stick with a seemingly retro landline biz?

"Since early 2008, the company has been transitioning away from the wireless side," says Embarq spokesman Vernon Fraley.

[caption id="attachment_16506" align="alignright" width="140" caption="The new guy in landlines"]news-centurylink[/caption]

And the strategy behind the move? "We continue to review our product and services portfolio," says Fraley, "to assure the needs of our customers are met and achieving financial success."

And with the Monroe, Louisiana-based CenturyTel's $11.3 billion purchase of Embarq, the new merged company will hold landlines in 33 states. So Embarq doesn't see landlines as a loser business.

Much as railroads once faded to highways only to bounce back as a hot transportation mode, at least one analyst believes history will repeat itself with wired phone lines.

"I do believe there will be an overload on the cellular network and a point of no return," says telecom consultant Bob Schotta. "There are only so many towers."

Schotta predicts more dropped cell calls because of too many people going wireless. "A business," he adds, "can't afford to be solely on a cell network."

Schotta thinks technology like Verizon's FiOS fiber optic communications network–- which carries high-speed phone, Internet, and TV at speeds "50 to 60 times what you can get around here"–- is the next big thing.

Schotta suggests that the Embarq/CenturyTel merger is an investment and CenturyLink will wait for a buyout offer from a bigger company like Verizon or AT&T.

Meanwhile, customers of the company that was once Centel then Sprint and Embarq have learned one thing: Don't get too attached to the name of your phone company– and do find a new cellphone carrier.

Read more on: embarqmergerphone

4 comments

This is the scary part of the story "Schotta suggests that the Embarq/CenturyTel merger is an investment and CenturyLink will wait for a buyout offer from a bigger company like Verizon or AT&T."

Soon all telephone service will be a monopoly and then see what happens to your monthly bill

I will go to a cable or high speed internet provider and it will drop in price and increase in features or just go wireless. They can't afford to go up much, there ain't no monopoly anymore in phone service

"This is the scary part of the story ââ?¬Å?Schotta suggests that the Embarq/CenturyTel merger is an investment and CenturyLink will wait for a buyout offer from a bigger company like Verizon or AT&T.”

Soon all telephone service will be a monopoly and then see what happens to your monthly bill"

A Verizon buyout could not happen soon enough as far as I'm concerned (Comcast is their competitor).
FIOS is just unbelievable. I moved here from MA where I had 30MBS speed for the price of my Comcast here (10MBS - $99 triple play phone/cable/internet package).
I hate Comcast (switched from them to Verizon fios as soon as it became available) and do not need my landline, but Embark's new, slow-to-be-offered naked DSL is a joke. $29/month before tax and modem rental, 1yr commitment for a laughable 1.5MBS speed is just plain backwards.

Embarq/CenturyTel just does not have the resources to bring fiber optic to C'ville.

I'm charging them a $175 early termination fee for turning off my cellphone.