Ragged cost: Wildfire tally nears quarter-million mark

As the criminal trial nears, tallies of suppression costs and property losses have begun in the so-called Ragged Mountain Fire, and the price-tag appears to have neared the quarter-million-dollar mark, including nearly $50,000 to extinguish the sprawling conflagration. Meanwhile, the late February blaze scorched 609 acres of terrain, according to an official with the Virginia Department of Forestry.

"We confirmed it with GPS," says David Powell, an assistant regional forester, who notes that an earlier estimate of over 800 acres included "initial containment lines" that were wider than what actually burned.

This fire– which began on a wind-whipped Saturday in a financially troubled subdivision– cost the Forestry Department $9,940, a figure that includes only the time and fuel expended for Department-mustered workers and equipment, not the efforts of the myriad other fire companies that pitched in.

If the cost– at $16 an acre– seems a little low, indeed it's less than one quarter of the $72 per acre five-year average the Department cites.

"We don't bill for investigative time or for education," explains Powell, "We only bill for actual time spent putting it out."

At the Ragged Mountain fire, which began under mysterious circumstances on February 19, Powell says the Department got help from crews from Charlottesville, Augusta, and Nelson, plus various volunteer and career companies from Albemarle.

The Forestry Department's effort included a pair of bulldozers and three full-time employees on the fire's first two days with assistance from six part-timers and a Department fire engine. Reductions in men and machine followed as the blaze came under control around 8pm on Sunday, February 20.

Although the fire was declared officially out on the morning of the 23rd, Powell says some stumps and trees smoldered until doused by the heavy rains of early March.

According to figures supplied by Powell, this one event far surpassed all the wildfires the Department fought last year in Albemarle. According to those 2010 data, the Department worked six county fires totaling just 22 acres and costing just $2,972 to extinguish.

State law gives the Forestry Department the right to seek reimbursement, and Powell notes that the Department won reimbursement from three "responsible" parties last year. One party that won't seek reimbursement is the City of Charlottesville.

"We provide that service as part of the City-County Fire Services Agreement," says Charlottesville Fire Charles Werner in an email. "Our costs were nominal, as we only had two units operating there."

Albemarle counted costs of $35,792, according to County spokesperson Lee Catlin, who notes that the tally includes Charlottesville's contribution as well as estimates of the value of volunteers. Combined with the Forestry Department, that's a suppression cost of $45,732. Catlin said she'd look into the question of reimbursement.

One person who learned what can can go wrong on a windy day is Charlottesville physician Tanner Shilling. Last March, on a Scottsville-area farm, he and his 4-year-old son were monitoring a pile of burning fenceposts.

"The wind just started taking it out of control," says Shilling, who says he found relief from the Scottsville Volunteer Fire Department after promptly calling 911. "It could have been a real disaster," says Shilling, "if I'd kept on thinking that I could take control of it on my own."

Besides a single scorched acre, the damage was confined to Shilling's checking account. He paid $111, including fine and court costs, for conducting a pre-4pm blaze.

"It was a lesson for me," says Shilling. "I won't do that again."

Already, some now fence- and foliage-challenged Ragged Mountain-area residents– not to mention the family that lost their equipment-packed barn, now estimated as a $175,000 loss– have begun beseeching the subdivision's primary owner for compensation. That's because officials have charged the handyman, Alex Toomy (who lost the subdivision to foreclosure last year) with starting the blaze. However, the new owner, Ragged Mountain Partners LLC, denies responsibility.

A judge gets Toomy's criminal case on Monday, March 28.

8 comments

Seriously? You are calling Toomy a "handyman?"!!!!

"Off with His Head" Its empty anyway .Just look what the "handyman" didnt do! By the way Toomy do you know how to install fireplaces!!!!!???

'One party that won't seek reimbursement is the City of Charlottesville. "We provide that service as part of the City-County Fire Services Agreement," says Charlottesville Fire Charles Werner in an email. "Our costs were nominal, as we only had two units operating there." '

"Albemarle counted costs of $35,792, according to County spokesperson Lee Catlin, who notes that the tally includes Charlottesville's contribution as well as estimates of the value of volunteers. "

"Catlin said she'd look into the question of reimbursement."

So. Charlottesville sucks it up on the cost. Meanwhile, Albemarle includes the city's cost and the contribution of volunteers when coming up with a figure.

Really? And I hear ongoing complaints about the revenue sharing agreement which, no one seems to remember, includes a possibility of Charlottesville paying Albemarle --- if only Ablemarle taxed itself accordingly?

But: I-have-no-children-so-why-am-I-paying-$X-for-education...blah...blah...blah.

It's simple, really. I need well educated children to pay taxes when I'm old. And I need whoever is there first to put out the fire so it doesn't spread to my house. It's a community thing, a generational thing, a regional thing, a neighborly thing. The neighborhood is bigger than we think.

Back on topic, I seem to recall from somewhere that the burn pile that ostensibly started this, wasn't burned the day we weren't supposed to burn things. Beyond "no comment", is there any news about that?

Barbara Myer says the following:

"It's a community thing, a generational thing, a regional thing, a neighborly thing. The neighborhood is bigger than we think."

I think she's right. But to conservatives, she's got it all wrong. For them it's all about me, me, me. They demand their tax cuts and give-aways, and land use subsidies, and bail-outs. They tout the "effectiveness" and the "efficiencies" of "the markets." Except, of course, when "the markets" work against them and then they want somebody (the taxpayers) to intervene and protect them from market realities (Hunter Craig and Biscuit Run constitute the perfect example).

Community? Not for conservatives.

For them it's all about selfishness.

I do not know Alex Toomy, however, it seems like he's gotten a raw deal both from the media and the speculative charges placed on him to put a face to the fire. No one has placed him on scene burning anything on the day of the fire. If he was burning legally over a week before then it's a stretch to say he is responsible. And to place the blame on the owners of the subdivision is absurd. This town loves a witch hunt and tabloid news. For such a small town, the Hook certainly does try to stir up controversy at every turn. Let's focus on real news and concrete facts.

I still say the family that lost their $175,000 equipment-packed barn should have had insurance.

Dead on Gasbag. No insurance for dat is inexcusable

Toomy and/or the property owners liability insurance should kick in to compensate neighbors for specific property losses. Thats how it normally works.