Hook Logo
Search

NEWS- Unwanted neighbor: Island reels from Rice's arrival


Published September 20, 2007 in issue 0638 of the Hook
Bookmark and Share


Rice in April 2002, two weeks after John Ashcroft blamed him for a double murder
FILE PHOTO BY JEN FARIELLO
Kent Island, Maryland is in an uproar after a man implicated in several high-profile kidnapping and murder cases quietly moved to the upscale community of retirees and white-collar commuters following his July 17 release from federal prison. Darrell David Rice was convicted of an attempted kidnapping in the Shenandoah National Park in 1997 and took an Alford plea in an attempted kidnapping on Rt. 29 near Culpeper. He was indicted, briefly, in a brutal double homicide, also in Shenandoah National Park, in 2002, and publicly suspected but never charged in the "Route 29 stalker" case.

"Say it ain't so!" says the first of dozens of posts on a Kent Island community message board where news of Rice's arrival first broke on September 6. Subsequent posts on that board as well as on the Hook's website suggest a community struggling to assess what some see as a danger in their midst.

"Our high school events have been adjusted and women are gossiping in fear," writes one. "How do we live with him... or get him out of our small town?"

The fear and uncertainly have quickly escalated. 

"People are hysterical," says Lt. Dale Patrick, spokesman for the Queen Anne County sheriff's department. By Friday, September 14, Patrick says, deputies were struggling to respond to a flurry of often hysterical and wildly inaccurate Rice-related reports. Among them: that Rice had hijacked a school bus and was attacking children inside; that the local high school was on lockdown after a Rice attack; and that Rice had cut off his GPS tracking device and was engaged in a shootout at a gas station following a high-speed police chase. 

All the claims were quickly discredited, says Patrick, who adds that on the same day those reports came in, both a sheriff's deputy and Rice's federal probation officer independently confirmed that Rice was safely at the luxurious waterfront home where he lives with his mother, his GPS device still firmly attached.

"Rumors like that are draining resources," says Patrick, who adds that his department is now dealing not only with the community's fear of Rice but also with the safety concerns of Rice's family and immediate neighbors. Rice's mother, Lenna Mays, declined comment. "We have nothing to say to the Hook," she said, before hanging up.

Sweet Briar Lane, where Rice now lives, is a private road, says Lieutenant Patrick, but that hasn't stopped a steady stream of cars from making their way up to check out Rice's new digs.

"It's become almost like a tourist attraction," says Patrick. Part of the problem, he admits, is the sparse information offered by the federal government about the conditions of Rice's probation. Patrick says his department has requested meetings with federal agents to learn the exact conditions to which the convicted felon is bound.

While court documents show he'll be on supervised probation for three years, for instance, Rice may not have to wear a GPS monitor for that period of time. The nature of the GPS monitoring is also unclear-- is a government agent actually watching Rice's every move 24 hours a day, or is the device simply reporting his movements to a computer? Rice's federal probation agent declined comment on the time or method of GPS monitoring, citing a supervisor's order. That supervisor did not return the Hook's call, nor did U.S. Attorney Thomas Bondurant, who worked on the Park murder case.

Patrick says further complicating his department's ability to inform the public is the fact that although the charges were withdrawn, Rice is still considered a suspect in the 1996 murders of Lollie Winans and Julie Williams, killed at a campsite in the Shenandoah National Park in May of 1996. 

"The safety of the community is first and foremost," Patrick says, "but we don't want to impede a homicide investigation being conducted by another agency."

That homicide investigation gained steam in July 1997 when Yvonne Malbasha was passed by a man in a pickup truck while she was biking in the Park. After she'd turned onto a more remote road, the truck, with Rice behind the wheel, passed near her, causing her to fall. As she righted herself, Rice stopped, and, screaming obscenities, attempted to abduct her. 

Malbasha fought back, throwing a water bottle at him and grabbing her bike when he tried to force her into the truck. Rice then attempted several times to run her down, fleeing only when she took refuge behind a tree. By the time rangers caught Rice attempting to leave the Park, he'd changed clothes and had reattached license plates removed before the attack. Rice eventually pled guilty to attempted kidnapping and received an 11-year sentence.

His legal woes were just beginning. When investigators reviewed videos taken at Park entrances during the time of the double homicide the year before, they noticed that Rice had entered the park on May 25, the day after the last known sighting of Winans and Williams, and again on May 26-- through a different entrance.

On April 10, 2002, then-attorney general John Ashcroft announced that a federal grand jury had indicted Rice for Winans' and Williams' murders. Because the two women had been lovers and Rice had allegedly made anti-gay statements in the past, Ashcroft called the killings "hate crimes" and sought the death penalty. But the largely circumstantial case crumbled without any direct DNA link to Rice. 

In addition, Rice's lawyers have pointed out, male DNA from someone other than Rice was found at the scene, and a recorded statement that prosecutors used to illustrate Rice's anti-gay bias had actually been incorrectly transcribed to change its meaning.

Though feds couldn't pin the murders on him, in another case they did manage to convince Rice to take an Alford Plea-- in which a suspect denies guilt but admits there is enough evidence to convict. That case involved a 1996 attempted kidnapping of a female motorist on Route 29. Six years after that incident-- and soon after Ashcroft had named Rice in the Park slayings-- Carmelita Shomo identified Rice as the man who motioned her off the road and convinced her there was something wrong with her car. When she accepted a ride, Shomo testified, Rice drove around for a while, then stopped and forced her head into his lap while pushing a screwdriver into her neck. 

Shomo was one of numerous women pulled over in this fashion by a man who became known as the "29 Stalker" and who has never been caught. The stalker's final victim, Alicia Showalter Reynolds, was murdered in 1996, her body discovered several months later. No physical evidence has ever tied Rice to her death, but Rice was publicly branded a suspect.

Despite the attempted kidnapping conviction, four lawyers for Rice say he had nothing to do with the attack on Shomo, and that they persuaded him to accept the plea against his wishes. Regarding his assault on Malbasha, they claim he had mental illness but is now totally trustworthy.

In a letter to Kent Islanders, the lawyers blame the panic on law enforcement agencies who have "maliciously and falsely prosecuted him" and the media, in particular the Hook, which ran two cover stories in May, two months before his release. ["Cold Case? Alicia Showalter Reynolds & the fall and rise of Darrell Rice," May 17, 2006, and "Murder in the Park: Rice release revives memories," May 24, 2007]

"You have nothing to fear from Darrell Rice, and we hope that he has nothing to fear from you," writes Charlottesville-based Deirdre Enright, the lead attorney who represented Rice, in a letter to the Island. In a particularly strong statement of support, Enright writes, "After all these years, we count him as a friend as well as a client, and he is welcome in our homes and around our children."

Some residents of Kent Island say they are not so comforted by the letter-- which was posted on the Queen Anne County sheriff's website "to help get information out," says Lt. Patrick-- or by Rice's GPS tracking device.

"Right now everyone's on guard," says one Kent Island mother of a six-year-old daughter, who like most people the Hook contacted, asked for anonymity, citing fear of Rice. "What happens in three, four, five years when people forget, and they don't have their guard up?"

The biggest concern, says the woman, is the island's "treasure"-- miles of secluded walking and biking trails frequented by female joggers and young mothers walking their children to school. The woman says she no longer feels safe, even in a small group.

As for Rice's lawyers' impassioned letter of support, she's not impressed.

"Even if he didn't commit the murders, what he did to that woman in Shenandoah Park, that's bad enough," she says, referring to Malbasha. "We don't need that."

#

Comments

                     
Has Questions9/22/2007 12:52:52 PM

It is a shame no one is willing to give the sentencing information or admit that the ankle bracelet comes off in Jan. 2008, less than 4 months away. If people think there was hysteria last week on Kent Island when the word traveled about the new resident Rice, wait until they find out the ankle bracelet monitor comes off in LESS than 4 months. Mr. Rice is free to come and go as he pleases now with it on. Yes there are other predators of children living on Kent Island but the majority of sexual crimes against children are committed by people close to them in their lives. Mr. Rice preys mostly on strangers with the number of incidents and frequency very high. The average is 1 victim every other day, hence the term "serial". This puts Mr. Rice is another category all his own.

Can't Wait9/22/2007 6:12:53 PM

FREE DARRELl RICE

Waiting9/22/2007 6:45:23 PM

Darrell Rice is free to leave Kent Island, we certainly do not welcome him here.

In Fear in Paradise9/22/2007 10:20:31 PM

What a shame? Mr. Rice has been released from prison and now we are in prison. Our schools' athletic groups can no longer use the trails to run they are stuck on school grounds, just like prisoners. All the tax money to make the cross island trail and now people are afraid to use it. I do not want my children outside. I feel that ache in my stomach every time my son wants to ride his bike. How does one keep a teenager in the yard?? I am much more worried about my daughter considering Mr. Rice attacks women. She stays in the house or in our yard because she is afraid to walk or do her morning run. She is now in prison while Mr. Rice a convicted felon walks free. I realize that he paid his debt to society but I do not want my child or myself to be the next debt he owes to society. Why not stay in Virginia or in a big city? Why come to Queen Anne's County where there are many parks, nature trails, and a frame of mind from 35 years ago. We all have read how nature trails seem to be where Mr. Rice likes to meet his victims. We now lock our house, our cars, our shed, our garage because we are in prison.

I found the letter from his attorneys who I am sure his mother pays very well to be condescending and down right ridiculous. Of course they feel he is safe around him they could ID him easily if he were to attack them. I think he prefers strangers from all that I have read of his attacks and suspected attacks and murders.

Thank you to Mr. Rice and his mother for bringing fear to our paradise. Home is no longer an unlocked door, children playing freely, women walking the neighborhood with their babies, and a wonderful sense of community. That is all gone and the only thing left is fear and Mr. Darrell David Rice's rights are the only thing the police and federal agents are worried about.

Waiting9/23/2007 9:16:33 AM

I think the attorney scumbags are doing the case for free. Some people think the only bad press is an obituary where they spell your name wrong. The person responsible for housing Mr. Rice is his brother-in-law Russell Metcalfe, the owner of the large company, popular on the western shore. He is listed as owner on the property records as are his parents.

Ankle Monitor Off 113 DAYS9/26/2007 7:03:38 PM

Well they finally admitted it in the Bay Times today, the ankle monitor comes off Jan. 17, 2008. They said he was not charged with other crimes but failed to admit he was indited for murders and almost went to trial. Most likely he will be going to trial in the future for those murders, the government left it so that possibility is there. Just on the news today a guy got busted for murder 32 years after the crime.

Not Goin' Anywhere10/11/2007 12:57:38 AM

I'm free to live wherever I choose!

DDR

10/16/2007 8:39:50 AM

You are in facr free to live where you want but are you really free, able to go out in public and enjoy life?

Ankle Monitor Off 18 Days12/29/2007 9:14:17 PM

Hearing set for Jan. 18 with Judge Norman Moon in Charlottsville, Virginia for the purpose of EXTENDING the duration of the gps monitor. It is set to come off in 18 days. Might be a good idea to contact Judge Moon ASAP, before the hearing, before it comes off in 18 days, to let him know that Kent Island residents would like for him to EXTEND it.

Ankle Monitor Off Jan1/2/2008 11:36:42 PM

The hearing on Jan. 18 in Charlottsville with Judge Norman K. Moon is not only for the GPS duration but also to prevent Darrell Rice from watching pornography or going anywhere that pornography is electronically accessible. You can contact Judge Moon - phone: 434-845-4891 or Fax 434-846-4527

GPSoff4months9/15/2008 5:32:12 PM

DDR had several violations mentioned at the court hearing with Judge Moon. One of them had to do with sexual violence testing that he FAILED. Why was nothing done about this? How many people spend time in jail for failures to pay fines and showing up for DUI court dates yet DDR goes free. Why? Don't think the local QA County LEO can do anything about it, they are not even privvy to the information. Sad.

possible witness12/2/2008 11:27:37 AM

As the time comes up for his monitoring to be extended or not, I am hopeful that another round of information will hit the streets. The Hook and other media could help, by doing follow-up reporting on where this case stands in the legal system.

AnkleMonitor12/23/2008 5:01:47 PM

I heard yesterday the ankle monitor was extended because of another violation.

AnkleMonitor12/29/2008 2:47:32 PM

Looks like the GPS stays on until 7/29/09.

Ankle1/9/2009 12:02:32 PM

PW, I really need to get a very important message to you. Is there any way? It does not have to be directly.

possible witness1/10/2009 6:59:31 PM

Can you post it here? I'm reading - just not writing.

possible witness1/11/2009 4:48:26 PM

To the person trying to reach me - if you can give me a telephone number, I will try to call you, as long as you are not media or a member of the defense team.

Ankle1/11/2009 5:30:21 PM

HI PW, Someone other than myself would like to talk to you but I do not feel comfortable posting the number here. It is not a member f the media or defense team, it is someone I think you would want to talk to. Where there is a will, there is a way, we just have to find it. I would be willing to give the info to someone else, I just do not want to post it. I think you understand.

possible witness1/11/2009 6:23:51 PM

What do you suggest?

Are you the same person who has been posting on here that the monitor is staying on until July? Is that information going to be released to the public through the media or court records? If not, how can it be verified?

Why did the Kent Island forum become off limits to those of us asking questions about this, just as it was coming back up for review?

Is it because the moguls do not want any more bad press for KI, or because he is no longer living where he was, and they want to keep people from finding out? As you know, the danger magnifies if we don't have some idea of where he is and how widely he is allowed to circulate.

Is this what you're trying to let me know?

If so, it would be a public service to have people be able to read it on here. Although I appreciate your trying to warn me if you or your friend think I am in danger, I am not interested in just protecting my own neck. I want to help keep others from danger - that is why I posted here last year and continue to try to see if people in certain areas are still aware of his daily movements. The more we all know about his whereabouts the safer we are.

AnkleMonitor1/11/2009 6:42:52 PM

Hi PW, The date of July I was told is not correct, the date is actually the middle of June, I believe it is June 19th. I was told the information is on the Commonwealth of Virginia Western District webpage but I cannot find it. I am probably not going to the correct area. If you are able to get on that site and can find it, I would appreciate it if you could post the link here so I can see it. There was a technical violation so it was extended. As far as the other forum, I think it is the registered members that only have the mental capacity to talk about football, beer and local restaurants that are the reason why DDR news is not posted. You are well aware of how they like to shootdown anyone that is not part of their little group. As far as his living arrangements, as far as I know he is still on Kent Island at his sisters house. I know of no specific danger that you are in, I just think any woman is possibly in danger in this situation. I was told he has a new probation officer and am not sure how much cooperation the authorities will have with the new one. We will see.

Ankle1/11/2009 6:51:14 PM

Did you see the show THS Investigates Serial Killers on the Loose? I heard part of the show was on the Rt. 29 stalkings. I did not see that part. The Feds have another suspect in that case, a former cop who is in jail in the Carolinas. I still do not see why no DNA tests are being done. They should still be able to DNA test Evonitz even though he is dead. As far as the Shenendoah Park crimes, they do not have Evonitz going in and out of the park on camera like they do DDR. "Some" people, not everyone are saying DDR does not have the intelligence for the 2 Shenandoah slayings and others are saying a cop would not be dumb enough to do it. Who knows?

possible witness1/11/2009 8:15:47 PM

The Route 29 stalkings, as they are called, were probably not all done by one person. Some could have been DDR. He certainly had the proximity. My encounter with him was not on Route 29, but that doesn't mean he wasn't there sometimes.

As far as whether the killings in the park required a certain level of "intelligence," I can only say that my experience of him is that he knows all the ways to use a knife, and was proud of that knowledge. Knowledge and intelligence are not the same. If he did that crime, he had probably studied up on how not to leave evidence behind, just as he knew to wear a different shirt and not to leave his license plate where it could be seen. Next time he'd probably try to make sure the cameras are not working. Not sure if that indicated a lack of knowledge or of smarts - maybe just a certain arrogance, in assuming it wouldn't matter if there wasn't any other evidence? And so far it hasn't . . .

I still don't know what to tell your friend, in terms of getting a message to me. If she's also a PW, she should find someone as local as she can and get herself deposed. That would be the most helpful. If she finds someone she can trust, who believes her and won't sell her out, she could really help the cause.

I wish I could help more - I've divulged as much as I can. Just keep having faith that justice will triumph, if the evidence reaches a critical mass. Keep praying that it will happen before anyone else is hurt.

AnkleMonitor1/11/2009 8:24:15 PM

I am working on the getting in contact situation, this might take awhile but it will be worth it, for sure.

I am not doubting just wondering why you think the Rt. 29 stalkings could have been more than 1 person. From all I have read, they are quite similar, same situation, same excuse.....flames shooting out, let me give you a ride. I am sure you know more about these cases than I do, I am just trying to learn. thanks

possible witness1/11/2009 8:59:16 PM

I can't say much more about the Route 29 stalkings, except that a lot of energy has gone into trying to discredit the witnesses about those events, as if to say that if DDR can't be proven to have done them all, he didn't do any.

Let me know if you figure out the contact possibility - I'll respond if I can. I'd still love to hear if you know anyone who has actually seen him on Kent Island or coming to & from work since early Dec.

Could be a very good thing if he has a new probation officer . . .

AnkleMonitor1/11/2009 9:14:12 PM

Last I heard he was working for the State of Maryland at a Vehicle Emissions place in Prince George's County Maryland. He had even received "employee of the month". Most likely someone in the family got him the job, they are not originally from the Kent Island area. No one on Kent Island was willing to give him a job, he had applied at numerous restaurants/bars. I doubt he has moved off of Kent Island. Rumor had it he was in Kmart shopping at Christmas time. My main concern right now is the violation that caused him to have to keep the monitor on another 6 months. Did you find the info on the VA webpage, please share if you did. thanks

possible witness1/12/2009 1:00:37 PM

Pretty sure I know the nature of the violation, but that doesn't mean it will be part of the public record. It's the reason I was trying to find out if anyone on KI had seen him, for sure, during a particular time period. If the KI forum truly provided a community service, it would have been possible for that to happen, but you're right, things got very out of control on there very quickly, and the people seem to grow more bizarre all the time. It's probably better for them to keep their games to themselves, although it does increase the danger to the public if we can't have a safe way to exchange information. Thank God for the Hook.

So if his new PO has a grip on things and he's still there or back there, with the monitor in place, that's great. I didn't believe the original story about the extension to late July because the date was so off, out of keeping with judicial precision.

The minute any official info is released, and this would be a good week for it, the media should be on it. I've been watching the docket for a possible hearing, but it should have been posted before if it were happening this week. So maybe what you heard is correct - that it's already been extended because of the violation. And maybe they're trying to keep the whole thing quiet, even burying it on the website, because of what happened last year, and because of the ongoing investigation.

I usually try to stay calm and trust that it is a logical process that sometimes seems illogical from the outside. If everybody will just do their job, we will all benefit.

Ankle Monitor1/12/2009 1:20:26 PM

The decision for the extension happened right before Christmas. I can only guess what the violation was, possibly another failure of the genitle testing or he went without the GPS. He had other violations in the past and nothing happened.

I did not think the date of July was correct either and was able to find out it is June 19, which makes more sense. Can you give me a link to the court records? I was told the info about the extension is on there but no info on what the technical violation was. It is my understanding that a technical violation is not a new crime but something to do with probation stipulations. What do you think it could have been?

It is my understanding that if you have a specific date in question, it can be verified by GPS where he was, unless he took it off of course. I was warned he can get it off and there are ways to deceive the GPS system.

possible witness1/12/2009 1:46:08 PM

I am not at liberty to give more details about what I was told, only that it did involve the question of his whereabouts which grew increasingly frightening, esp. when it seemed possible that people were vouching for him with false information.

Only a last-ditch effort to find out for myself if anyone on KI had seen him would have sent me back to that viper pit. As far as I know, nothing official has been released about the extension. I don't doubt that it happened, and for the reasons we surmise. I just don't know if we can verify it unless the powers that be decide that they want it out there. I know it's frustrating, but as I said, I try to assume that they've got good reasons if they've kept if from being accessible on the web.

My great good wish, of course, is that the next story we read about him would be about his arrest on a new indictment. I just hope it doesn't have to be on new charges of something he's been able to do while he's supposedly being watched. That keeps me risking my own neck, here and elsewhere, hoping that there will be a break in the case. Thanks for caring.

Ankle Monitor1/12/2009 1:52:14 PM

Being his family and his legal team are in total denial, I can see them lying for him. That is no surprise.

Have you ever talked to Queen Anne County officials, the probation officers or Judge Moon? They might have the answers you are looking for.

I like you have concerns not only for myself but for everyone. I am surely at the top of his hit list.

possible witness1/12/2009 2:14:24 PM

The only answer that will help me right now is that somebody knows where he is 24/7 and that his calls and e-mails are being monitored. Pray that that is the case.

Ankle Monitor1/12/2009 2:22:35 PM

Sounds like he needs a GPS on the vehicles he has access to. They obviously do not know where he is 24/7 or there would have been no cause for alarm and no one lying to cover up for him.

AnkleMonitor1/15/2009 8:21:39 PM

THS Investigates " Serial Killers on The Loose" reairs on the E! channel on Saturday Jan. 24th 2009 at 2pm and before that at noon is a show on the mind of Serial Killers. I think part of the second show is on the Rt. 29 stalkings/murder, 23 stalkings in 46 days. There was some similarity with those stalkings to the attack DDR was convicted of, the victims were made to step on an a jacket on the passenger side of the truck and many report the guy said his name was "Larry". Some people think DDR is not smart enough to have committed the murders of the 2 hikers in Shenandoah. It took 23 attempts over 46 days to successfully complete the Rt. 29 stalkings that culminated in the death of the last woman stopped, Alicia Showalter Reynolds. Something else to think about, Evonitz raped his victims, he was a pedophile, he attacked children and teens.

possible witness1/24/2009 5:59:38 PM

I watched both programs but didn't see anything about the Route 29 cases. Wondered if they were advised not to use photos or other info right now. Did you say that an earlier version of the program did cover it?

I agree that Evonitz would not have been so hesitant and that none of the victims fit his M.O. At least so far, that we know of, DDR has not attacked any kids. Scaring strong women is his elixir.

Any recent sightings of him on KI, to your knowledge?

Ankle Monitor1/24/2009 9:28:48 PM

Sorry to say, I was told the Rt. 29 Stalkings/Murder was on that show but the person must have gotten it confused with the Colonial Parkway murders. There is a slim posibility there was another show on the Rt. 29 crimes and the person got the shows confused. I am waiting to hear if that was the case, but I doubt it.

As far as local sightings, none that I know of, but then again, people do not seem to care. His sister looks more like his old pictures than he does now. I think most people forgot about it although the subject does rarely come up. The local papers print nothing and the authorities are told nothing. The local authorities give out more bad/wrong info than anyone or anything the internet has printed. I guess it is not their fault they are not kept informed but it would be nice if they were more proactive. I can find out more info than they know. If it was not for you and The Hook, no one including the authorities would know anything.

If you question his whereabouts, from what I was told, if you give a specific date and time, supposedly they can go back and verify his whereabouts. I hope that is not more bad info from authorities. He has a new probation officer in Maryland.

Have you been in contact with anyone to verify the GPS date or the violation? From what you said before, it sounds like he went for an extended period of time without his GPS, people were lying to vouch for him and you were alerted for your safety.

possible witness1/26/2009 12:00:32 PM

I'm sure you understand that I cannot discuss in this venue whether or to whom I have addressed questions and/or whether or by whom I have been contacted. I am simply trying to find out the last definite date that he was seen by neighbors on Kent Island, whether it was going to & from work, shopping at K-Mart, or some other location.

It would still be helpful to me to have this information, for my own sake. That was what I was trying to accomplish on the Kent Island Forum before public access was taken away, making it very difficult to communicate effectively, as we were able to do last year, in spite of the craziness that infects that site. Maybe they are more civilized to each other when they are made to register, but I obviously don't have that option. I have always tried to be kind and not to say insulting or degrading things about Mr. Rice or his family. I have great sympathy for his mother and sister, although I do sometimes wonder at the level of their denial. It must be very painful for them, on some level, and I try to be cognizant of that and think of how I would feel if he were my brother or son.

My bottom line is that I need to know his PLS (point last seen), as soon as possible.

Sick Of The Local Rambos1/26/2009 1:31:26 PM

possible witness and Ankle Monitor, I'm just curious. Why don't you two use e-mail?

possible witness1/26/2009 10:31:47 PM

I'm assuming you're asking a rhetorical question to try to distract or belittle us - standard practice. In case you really can't figure it out - we don't know each other and obviously cannot trade e-mails. Our only connection is Mr. Rice and the only way we can try to communicate is on here. There's nothing Rambo about it - just trying to stay safe. If you're sick of women who care about their own welfare, just stop reading. This is not for you unless you want to help - unless you have the info we seek.

Ankle Monitor1/27/2009 5:50:20 PM

Apparently Dawn has a daughter that does not live with her on Kent Island. Maybe Dawn is not in total denial or maybe it is the girl's father that has better sense. Either way, I cannot imagine having a child and giving up the child just so my brother can live with me after he gets out of the Federal Pen for abduction and violence against females. I cannot imagine how the child must feel. At least she is safer living elsewhere.

possible witness1/28/2009 2:56:56 PM

As I have said many times before, I am not interested in criticizing or analyzing his family. I wish them well and hope that he would be of no danger to the women who obviously love and nurture him, or to his niece. I am only concerned with his whereabouts and actions toward women he might encounter at times when his rage might be more freely expressed. I would still very much like to know if anyone there has seen him - the exact date, and where.

Ankle Monitor1/28/2009 9:28:40 PM

I thought one of the stipulations of his release was he had to live with his family. His mother Lenna Mays still has a local phone number listed at the 401 Sweetbriar address and our local authorities are still concerned so I am assuming he is still here, or "suppose" to be here.

Sick Of The Local Rambos1/28/2009 9:59:34 PM

Possible Witness, you said "I'm sure you understand that I cannot discuss in this venue whether or to whom I have addressed questions and/or whether or by whom I have been contacted."

I was simply suggesting the two of you could speak more privately and exchange more information with each other by using e-mail.

I don't know a lot about Rice. I am under the opinion that law enforcement tried to clear a lot of cases by falsely pinning them on Rice. This I do not approve of. If they can not solve a case, they need to keep the case open and list the status as "still under investigation".

Ankle Monitor1/28/2009 11:01:10 PM

You admit you don't know much about DDR, maybe you should read up on him, there is plenty of information on the internet. Check out all the other articles on THE HOOK, there are plenty to read, should keep you busy for days. The purpose of this comment section is to exchange information, which needs to be shared with the public. Rice is not totally innocent, you don't spend that many years in the Federal Pen for nothing. Just because some of the investigations into some of the crimes were botched, that does not mean Rice is innocent of everything. I agree that Evonitz and the excop need to be DNA tested and investigated but so does Rice. Rice denied being in Shenandoah Park some of the days that they have him on camera going in and out of the park, this was during the time the 2 girls were murdered. He only admitted to being in the park after the girls were killed, the day he was there with his friends while the investigaters were there. They have him on camera going in and out of the park numerous days at that time even though he denied it, the camera does not lie. They do not have Evonitz or the excop on camera going in and out of the park at the time the girls were murdered. There are striking similarities to the crimes we know he did commit to some of the Rt. 29 stalkings/murder. How many abductors instruct their victims to put their feet on a jacket on the passenger side of their truck when they kidnap them? The Rt. 29 stalker did and so did Rice.

possible witness1/29/2009 5:11:58 AM

Sick - Let me say again that your suggestion that we speak "more privately" or use e-mail is impossible, since we don't know each other's identity or have each other's e-mail.

Is it possible to grasp that this is our only forum for exchanging information? You seem to have a vested interest in keeping information about Rice from being exchanged by distracting or intimidating anyone who might enter in.

Whether you approve of the way the case is being handled or of us discussing it here is not the point. The point is that the fear among women who have been or might become Rice's victims is real and you are apparently wanting to dismiss it or stand in the way of our discussion. I'm asking you to please not interfere. It is too important right now to find out whatever someone in the community might know.

Sick Of The Local Rambos1/29/2009 9:41:12 AM

Ohh good gosh, relax, will ya please? I was being sincere in my suggestion that free e-mail accounts would alow you two to discuss things you didn't want to print here. Free e-mail accounts such as [email protected] and [email protected]

I too have been a victim in the past. With two well documented and suspected attempts on my life. But I refuse to live in fear, then or now.

How about another suggestion? Have the two of you ever considered getting a concealed handgun permit?

Ankle Monitor1/29/2009 9:51:14 AM

Thanks for suggestion about alternative contact, I am working on that as it would be a plus.

I have urged PW to learn to use a weapon but she refuses. I hope she changes her mind on that one as a weapon could be beneficial to her. I would urge her to teach her children if she has them, it is good to familiarize them with weapons and their use. The next time someone is attacked, the attacker might be in for a big surprise.

I am not a fan of cellphones for young children but even a cellphone with no account can call 911.

About the witnesses, there are lots of witnesses that identified Rice at the Rt. 29 stalker/murderer with no hesitation or coaching.

Cameras do not lie, Rice does.

possible witness2/14/2009 12:56:32 PM

Many thanks to both of you for your concern. I'm getting lots of practice dealing with fear. Glad you've found ways to avoid it.

Maybe I'll go to another gun show sometime and find one I think I could handle.

Sick Of The Local Rambos2/14/2009 2:54:21 PM

Ankle Monitor, there is not enough space here, nor do I have the time to address "eyewitness" identifications. Sadly enough, they are not accurate in over 50% of such indentifications. And they are not accurate often because of the way the police do some photo lineups. I would suggest you read "Eyewitness Testimony" by Elizabeh Loftin. Most judges have read the book. And Elizabeth Loftus is considered an expert on the subject. Thanks to the work of many experts such as Mrs. Loftus, he courts are finally well aware of law enforcement's ability to introduce false memories into the minds of witnesses after a serious event.

And I am sure you recall when a victim in this Darrell Rice time frame positively identified a Virginia state trooper's image that had been placed in one photo lineup? When confronted about it being an actual law enforcement officer, she suddenly changed her tune to, 'Well, I meant he is the one whose picture that most looks like the person who assaulted me!" In my opinion, she was coached by law enforcement as to what to now say when changing her tune. They got caught with their pants down when they decided to put a real cop's image in a photo lineup.

One of our local TV stations staged a fake strong arm robbery. The "victims" were questioned afterwards and asked to give descriptions of who had just robbed them. The outcome did not surprise me, the couple could not agree on almost anything as far as giving a descriptions of their attackers. It was a real eye opener!

Ankle Monitor2/15/2009 8:16:27 AM

Just because there are problems in the way things are done, does not change the Facts of the crimes. There are many women that positively identified Rice with no hesitation or questioning. Like I stated before, if you look at a picture of him at the time he committed the crimes, a picture of him now and a current picture of his sister, his sister looks more like he use to look than he does. When you have such a dramatic change in appearance, I would suspect some false ID's can happen. All the false ID's do not negate the positive ID's and the facts of the crimes committed.

Sick Of The Local Rambos2/15/2009 10:51:15 AM

I disagree. All the false ID's most certainly DO negate the positive ID's and the facts of the crimes committed. This is America. It is better to let 5 guilty people go free than imprison 5 innocent men. This has always been one of the most fundamental beliefs we are suppose to have in our criminal justice system.

There was recently a "suspect" in a simple misdemeanor identified by the victim as a 20-ish year old Hispanic male, 5'4" tall, 140 pounds, black hair and clean shaven face (as in no mustache). The rookie cop investigating the case called DMV and asked for 6 pictures of 50-ish year old white males to be used in a photo lineup. End result was the victim picked out a 220 pound 50+ year old white male, 5"11", gray hair and mustache as the alleged "suspect". Only God above and the cop will ever know how she presented this photo lineup to him in order to convince him to pick out a 50+ year old 5'11" 220 pound white male. The judge dismissed the charge before this innocent person had to utter one word of defense in the courtroom. The cop now has a $4 million lawsuit pending against her.

Shortly after this three ring circus by the cop is when the local TV station I mentioned above conducted their litle mock strong arm robbery. They wanted to explore the possibility of a person making such a serious false identification.

Trust me on this, I can go through DMV file pictures right now and find 6 people in Virginia that look so much like Darrell RIce that you could never successfully pick him out a photo lineup. In the case I spoke of above, there were 2 images from DMV where the people looked like twin brothers. Even though neither one of them even remotely appeared to be 20-ish year Hispanic males. The cop did a sloppy and incompetent investigation. And her photo lineup was even worse. In depositions this rookie testified she has always been interested in criminal investigations and was looking forwards to a promotion. I doubt this case I speak of helped her in her hopes of achieving this. I can't imagine any competent police supervisor taking this rookie out of patrol and promoting her to the detective division.

As I said above, if we place much faith in eyewitness identifications, there would be an innocent Virginia state trooper sitting in jail right now for a crime he didn't commit.

Disclaimer - I do not know Darrell Rice, I am not related to Darrell Rice, I do not condone anything he may have done to any vicitm at any time. I do believe photo lineups should not be inadmissible in court under all circumstances. The margin of error is way too high.

Ankle Monitor2/16/2009 9:14:21 PM

Just because there is a problem with photo lineups and crooked cops, criminals should not be able to get away with crimes. I agree our justice system is seriously flawed and needs a major overhaul but that is not going to happen. Just because the justice system is flawed, that is not an excuse to set criminals free to commit more crimes. I doubt there are many convictions based solely on photo lineups.

Ankle Monitor2/16/2009 9:17:46 PM

Out of the 6 people from Virginia in your lineup that look like Darrell Rice, how many of them were driving Darrell's truck in and out of Shenandoah Park at the time the 2 hikers were murdered?

Sick Of The Local Rambos2/16/2009 11:01:21 PM

Ankle Monitor, at this time I do not recall the time frames of when Rice's truck was spotted anywhere in relation to those murders. But on the other hand, I have reason to and usually do recall what I believe to be sloppy investigative techniques and haphazard investigations. This is why I vividly recall one victim positively and erroneously identifying a Virginia state trooper as her assailant. If Darrell Rice was in the photo lineup, she darn sure didn't pick him out.

And if you keep up with national news as much as I do, you would see there has indeed been a lot of wrongful convictions based on photo lineups. Many of these men are being set free right now with the help of the newfangled DNA testing. Set free after serving 15 to 20 in prison for crimes they did not commit. Seriously, think of the families nationwide that have been totally devastated by erroneous eyewitness identifications.

Again, I am not condoning anything Rice may or may not have done. But I would still rather see 5 guilty men go free if their convictions are based on another 5 innocent men going to jail. We can debate it, but I will never change my mind on this.

possible witness2/19/2009 5:44:10 AM

Sick - what if you knew that one of those five guilty men who went free in order to protect one of the five who might be innocent would kill or maim another woman? Criminals have far more rights than their potential victims. And very often the five so-called innocent men who would be implicated in the trials of five so-called guilty men are also involved in criminal activity. Otherwise they wouldn't be there to be implicated.

In other words, Darrell Rice would not have been so easily implicated in his comings & goings around Shenandoah National Park if he had not been clearly engaged in criminal activity there, just as he would not be implicated in the Route 29 stalkings if he had just been driving there like a normal, harmless person. Just as you will never change your mind, I will never believe that a woman's life is less important than a man's freedom to drive around looking for women he can terrorize. Once a man has stated that his favorite thing to do is to ruin a woman's day by telling her to go home and eat her children's shit, you can pretty much assume that he's not going to be the Good Samaritan. Think of the families nationwide that have been totally devastated by erroneous laws protecting criminals from implicating themselves.

You stated in another post that you have been the victim of crimes in the past, with two "well documented and suspected" attempts on your life, whatever that means. I somehow doubt that you know what it's like to be truly victimized - i.e., done bodily harm, or you wouldn't be quite so eager to say that you'd let guilty men go free in order to protect those who haven't done anything, yet, or on that particular round.

I'm glad that the two attempts on your life did not get close enough to do you any real damage. If they had, I have a feeling you wouldn't be so quick to defend Mr. Rice or others like him.

possible witness3/12/2009 11:27:39 AM

Does anyone know for sure if Mr. Rice is currently on a live monitor or a passive one? It could make a huge difference in terms of what he would be able to do before he would be caught. There was just a case out west where a Class 3 sex offender, the class considered most likely to reoffend, was wearing a passive GPS monitor even while he beat and stabbed a 13-year-old girl to death, in a rage because she giggled at him when he couldn't get it up to rape her.

GPS monitors that are not monitored live have minimal effect on deterring criminal acts - they can only be used after the fact, to determine whether the parolee was in the vicinity of the body. Let's hope that the records of Mr. Rice's movements since his release in July of 2007 have at least been preserved, in case they need to be checked against the location of assaults attempted or bodies found.

E.G.3/12/2009 1:27:50 PM

Who was the State Trooper suspected in this case or others? Was the cop ever arrested & put in prison?

Sick Of The Local Rambos3/12/2009 2:01:45 PM

Whoa! This is how rumors get started!

In a photo lineup a few years ago, the cops included a picture of a Virginia state trooper. He wasn't a suspect, they simply put his picture in the photo array the victim viewed.

It really backfired on them though, the victim absolutely positively identified the state trooper as the person who had attacked her. Later on, for whatever reason, the victim's tune changed to "I meant he looks most like the person who attacked me!"

In other words, eyewitness identification is about as reliable as a 25 year old refrigerator!

possible witness3/12/2009 4:17:02 PM

Nice diversion - The same victim once again identified Rice as not only the one who looked most like the one who had tried to abduct her, but the one who actually had.

Eyewitness testimony is not infallible, true, but there would be few crimes ever prosecuted without it. That's why things like GPS monitors become very important when it comes to proving innocence or guilt. Not to speak of protecting the community from the possibility of new crimes being committed while no one is checking the monitor.

Is anyone interested in knowing whether Mr. Rice's new PO monitors him live or only checks him once a day or once a week, or for their monthly meet-and-greet? Any Kent Islanders around who see his daily journeys to & from work on a regular basis?

Sick Of The Local Rambos3/12/2009 5:16:45 PM

Ohh, brother!!! I didn't recall that the same victim who positively identified the Virginia state trooper as her attacker was the same victim involved in identifying Rice. I have a major problem with her identification if this is indeed true.

When she (whoever, I forget her name) falsely and positively identified her attacker as a full time active Virginia state trooper it was hilarious!

Kristina3/12/2009 8:36:40 PM

Possible Witness & Ankle Monitor just can't let this go. Ankle Monitor needs a therapist and medication. They seem to have dedicated there entire lives to watching this man. Guilty or Not I think that it is all time to move on.

Sick Of The Local Rambos3/12/2009 11:26:22 PM

I don't know either one of them well enough to comment. But I have learned they place way too much faith in "eyewitness identification". At best, it's reliable in less than 50% of cases. And the Shomo girl picking out a Virginia state trooper as her assailant is the best proof of this a person could ever ask for. As a matter of fact, I think every defense attorney in America should use this best example when they represent a person who has supposedly been positively identified in a photo lineup.

possible witness3/13/2009 1:55:33 AM

Kristina, I can't speak for Ankle Monitor but I can assure you that I never wanted this man to have an influence on my life, at all. It was not my choice, any more than it was the choice any of the other women whose lives he made a permanent impact upon. As long as he is out of prison and able to move about with even a modicum of freedom, I will be concerned about anyone who might come into contact with him, especially women. If you know anything about survivors of violence, it's not that we don't go on living. But if the perpetrator is continually released and given more and more ability to act without detection, we must be vigilant to protect ourselves and others. That is indeed the only way that we can exercise our own rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Ankle Monitor has sometimes been too shrill for my personal taste, tis true. But I see her as one of the few brave women in the area who is willing to acknowledge the danger that Darrell Rice could pose if he is not monitored and/or treated. It is he who needs a therapist and medication. I continue to pray that this is happening, for his family's sake as well as the community's. There is always a specific reason for my concern and for my posting here. I don't do it for drama or to cause others trauma. I do it to try to be proactive so that I can sleep at night.

Otherwise, I know I wouldn't be able to live with myself if he hurt someone else and I hadn't at least tried to sound a warning.

Don't worry so much about the wrong guy getting punished, Sick. Neither C. Shomo or myself or any of the other women who know firsthand this man's past actions are likely to ever be willing to stand up to his defense team again. That doesn't mean you won't see him in court again, just that he knows they got him off before, and that may make him bold enough to eventually get caught again.

I'll continue trying to find out the answer to my original question: active or passive?

Kristina3/13/2009 5:35:45 AM

Both of them are nuts. Possible Witness goes back and forth with Ankle Monitor for a few months and then swears off ever discussing it again. I wish they would take there non sense else where and off the Cville blog. They don't even live in this area and neither does Darrell Rice. The man did his time and is now trying to start his life again, however they are making it extremly difficult. I am all for justice and I don't know if he did it or not but since he's trying to start his life over, i think it's a shame that these two people just can't seem to let it go. Frankly I'm tired of reading it in Cville and wish the Hook would close this blog.

possible witness3/17/2009 4:24:32 PM

If you are all for justice, as you say, and you don't know if he did it or not, which means you can't say for certain that he's innocent, why not just let the Hook be a place where people across the country can post concerns? I'm not on here to communicate with anyone in particular, but to let folks in both Virginia (where he committed most of his earlier crimes) and Maryland (where he now has the opportunity to do more) know the concerns I continue to have, being one whose life has been very affected by this man.

If my small attempts to pose questions and/or get them answered trouble you, I'm sorry. My hope is that folks on Kent Island still read this and will perhaps ask some of the same questions I am asking, since their local forums no longer serve the community, but only a few in power who think women's fears are foolish.

It does Mr. Rice no harm to simply ask whether he is monitored by an active GPS or a passive one. Why do you say it makes it "extremely difficult" for him if someone just wants to know whether his general whereabouts are known on a consistent basis? By the same token, it makes my life "extremely difficult" if I have to worry that hours or even days have passed with no one accounting for his movements. I am grateful to the Hook for continuing to allow posting on this subject, where there is some hope that someone will read it who knows something or can find out.

I have no problem with his getting on with his life. I just want to be able to get on with mine. You obviously have never come into contact with someone like this, whose very presence in the world, unfettered, makes any number of women fearful. I'm glad that you can be so blase about him. Wish I could.

Ankle Monitor3/17/2009 5:47:47 PM

There is a former cop that was suspected of being quilty of some of the same crimes DDR is suspected of. That former cop is in jail in another state for killing someone. I do not think he is the same trooper that was in the lineup.

As far as the GPS, I am guessing it is the same as before, one on the ankle and one in the pocket. Of course when he violates it, they don't do anything about it. Since our local LEO have nothing to do with this case, I wonder just how close he is being monitored. You figure he went without it for an extended period of time and people were lying to vouch for his whereabouts when he was not where he was suppose to be. At least Judge Moon had enough sense to extend the GPS. It is set to come off in 3 months.

Kristina, if you are disturbed by this blog, don't read it. Maybe you are the one that needs medication and psychiatry if it bothers you so much and you continue to read it.

Sick Of The Local Rambos3/17/2009 6:53:52 PM

Who is the cop in jail for murdering somebody?

possible witness3/25/2009 10:58:34 AM

In case you haven't heard, DDR was arrested for parole violation last wk, will go before the judge in Charlottesville tomorrow.

So glad they're finally doing something - if the Feds & the MD state police can get their heads together on this one, the dots may get connected.

possible witness3/26/2009 5:42:15 PM

Good news that the judge is keeping him in until April 7. Pray that more details of his violations will be admitted into evidence then.

Ankle Monitor4/4/2009 9:18:37 PM

Merry Christmas Everyone! Does anyone know what the violation was?

ankle monitor4/4/2009 10:00:02 PM

Violations were looking at porn again and there are 2 marijuana violations. The guidelines are 4-10 months but he could get as much as 2 years. 2 years sounds good to me.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/4/2009 11:19:17 PM

So, Ankle Monitor, you said above there is a former cop that was suspected of being quilty of some of the same crimes Rice is suspected of. And you went on to say this former cop is in jail in another state for killing someone.

So, who is it?

ankle monitor4/4/2009 11:30:55 PM

Oh, I don't want to bad mouth him, he might be innocent, har har. Look it up. If I was able to find out, you should be able to.

Ankle Monitor4/7/2009 4:54:54 PM

9 more months of incarceration for DDR. I wonder what happens in 9 months, will he have to wear the GPS and for how long.

possible witness4/9/2009 11:04:40 PM

Before the parole violations, he was to be monitored through the end of his original parole of three years, which would be until July of 2011. One would hope that he will have to start his parole over, since he never really did get it right.

Ankle Monitor4/9/2009 11:33:45 PM

The route 29 stalker took more than a few tries before he "got it right" as well.

Ankle Monitor 4/9/2009 11:37:13 PM

2011 or 2010 was the original sentence duration?

possible witness4/11/2009 11:22:48 PM

Not sure - perhaps it was originally 2010, but there was something about 2011 when the monitoring was extended.

Sometimes I think you are more than a casual observer, Ankle. Your comment about his getting it right - can you be more specific?

Ankle Monitor4/13/2009 5:16:27 PM

My comment about the Route 29 stalker "getting it right" is referring to the fact that there were so many attempts before the final one which was the murder of Alicia Showalter Reynolds. Darrell has been described as not being intelligent enough to have been able to pull it off but my theory is, that is why it took so many attempts.

vague mention4/14/2009 1:16:52 AM

I am also interested in hearing more about the supposed former cop who is mentioned above as serving time in North or South Carolina. I have searched the web and haven't seen anything. What case was that?

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/14/2009 9:11:25 AM

Vague Mention, that's the problem with cases such as Rice. Some people make up stuff as they go along. When repeatedly questioned about the cop suspected of murder as stated above, they simply ignore our questioning them about it and our wanting more information about their claima.

If it's common knowledge that a cop is in jail somewhere for committing the same type of crimes Rice is accused of or a suspect in..... By God, that cop should be investigated for the these crimes. It won't be the first time the cops have overlooked their own when investigating a series of crimes. And as proven by the recent Staunton, Virginia scandal, it won't be the first time a cop has covered for a murder suspect and falsely arrested somebody else for the crimes, knowing all along that the falsely arrested person was innocent!

Ankle Monitor4/14/2009 1:06:40 PM

Rambo, common sense should tell you that IF I was going to make something up, it certainly would not benefit DDR.

Most likely the former cop was investigated. He is in jail for voluntary manslaughter so most likely his incareration will end. With there being so many Route 29 stalkings/murder, it might be hard to link one particular suspect to all of the crimes.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/14/2009 5:11:16 PM

OK.

But some of us still want to know who the ex cop is. If he is indeed serving time for manslaughter, there's nothing wrong with naming him here.

true facts4/14/2009 7:18:55 PM

That's true, SickO. A statement, if true, such as "a former [location] police officer is currently serving a # year sentence for voluntary manslaughter in *o*th Carolina" would not be considered libelous. In the meantime, it would allow the rest of us who are concerned about these cases to find the particular case online and judge for ourselves if there are similarities. Personally, I do not understand the motivation behind not giving us the facts.

name needed4/14/2009 7:30:53 PM

Oops.. that should have read:

That's true, SickO. A statement, if true, such as "[Name of convicted ex-cop], a former [location] police officer is currently serving a # year sentence for voluntary manslaughter in *o*th Carolina" would not be considered libelous. In the meantime, it would allow the rest of us who are concerned about these cases to find the particular case online and judge for ourselves if there are similarities. Personally, I do not understand the motivation behind not giving us the facts.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/14/2009 8:11:00 PM

Correct. Until an web link is provided or a name attached to the tale, it remains nothing more than a rumor we heard on the Internet. If I don't know the ex-cop this person is referring to, there's a good chance the Route 29 Stalking/Murder Task Force doesn't know him either and hasn't investigated him as a suspect.

I know one cop's name that was reported to the Task Force as a possible suspect. But it was easily determined that it was just somebody seeking some sort of revenge or retaliation against the cop. As a matter of fact, the cop later won a libel judgement in Circuit Court against the person for all sorts of remarks she made on the Internet about him.

possible witness4/14/2009 8:22:52 PM

Ankle, just making sure you know more details of the latest sentencing: he will be in prison for nine months, and after that on "supervised release" for two years, and then two more years of monitoring. So that's a significant gain, in my book.

I can only speak for myself, in saying that I am unlikely to tell you guys much of anything if you are going to accuse me of making things up or engaging in pure speculation about this man. I not only know my own experience with him - I'll never get over seeing the haunted eyes of Yvonne Malbasha, who came so close to being assaulted and killed by Darrell Rice. You can bet she wants to know where he is at all times, too, and would never want him to know where she is. She's a wonderful person who deserves so much better than to have come in contact with the likes of him. We are all indebted to her for her courage in taking the stand and getting him off the streets for a decade. She is part of the reason I put myself on the line, in a small way, to repay her. I have no doubt that she saved other women by her courageous testimony.

Ankle Monitor4/14/2009 8:35:48 PM

I don't know Yvonne but I thank God she is alive and that she had the strength to go through the judicial process. I greatly appreciate her efforts.

That sounds like he will have a GPS for 4 years after he gets out. Sounds good to me. Maybe we will get a miracle and not have to worry about it.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/14/2009 9:41:43 PM

possible witness, all we're asking is for the name of the ex-cop who Ankle Monitor says is in jail in another state for murder.

Furthermore, no person should assume they are safe simply because they think somebody is in jail. A felon escaped from the Charlottesville Circuit Court very recently. The public wasn't notified. I don't think the witnesses who might have been instrumental in his being in jail were notified. The media wasn't notified. This escapee could easily have made it to the home of a witness against him and did some serious damage. Yeah, he was suppose to be in jail, people thought he was in jail, but he was an escapee roaming the streets.

feeling misinterpreted4/14/2009 11:01:28 PM

I didn't read anything as someone accusing anyone else of making things up. I was simply saying that stating fact cannot be considered libelous since Ankle seemed concerned about this above. Indeed, Yvonne Malbasha is to be commended for telling her story and testifying against her attacker, Darrell David Rice, as are the Route 29 victims and potential victims to be commended who came forward and recounted their experiences.

Can we have the name of the former police officer yet? :-)

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 11:09:21 AM

I hope I am wrong on this one but the way I read an article online, it seems he will not be on probation for 4 years but 2 years of supervised along with the GPS monitoring during the same 2 years.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 11:19:42 AM

I read where he had been working in Prince Frederick, not Frederick, Maryland. So he had just over 100 miles of roadway to drive back and forth everyday to work. Prince Frederick is not far from where he use to live in Calvert County, about half an hour south of Annapolis. That area is very similar to Kent Island in that it has lots of secluded beaches and wooded areas.

possible witness4/15/2009 2:05:04 PM

I don't know anything about the former police officer you mention. And believe me, I do know that just because he is behind bars doesn't mean I am safe. But it is important to sometimes feel a few hours or days of relief, to enjoy life and not feel his shadow lurking.

I'm pretty sure that the supervised release is for the first two years after he next comes out. That is much more intense than just GPS monitoring. If he gets through that without reoffending, there will be another two years of monitoring.

He's been through two POs by now, so he surely knows that he's got to toe the line, next time. During supervised release, anything he says to his parole officer can be used against him in court, no Miranda rights. So if he has the ability to control himself, that will be the time to prove it. As we've seen, he usually reoffends right away. That's been going on since his first drug arrests in the early 1990s.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 2:44:43 PM

Thanks for the clarification on the monitoring, from the article I read on Daily Progress, it seemed they ran together. I hope you are right. Thank you too PW for putting yourself on the line and having the courage to post.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/15/2009 3:19:12 PM

possible witness, the question still remains unanswered. What is wrong with you?

Who is the ex-cop that's in jail in another state for murder? Or did you just make it up as you went along?

If you made it up as you went along, what did you, the cops, and others make up so as to enhance the cases against Rice?

This is exactly why people have trouble believing anything a total stranger lays out in front of them in a court of law. I have told my local Circuit Court repeatedly that I am the last person they want to call as juror. And this is exactly why. You, as a "possible witness", now have no credibility with me whatsoever.

possible witness4/15/2009 4:18:22 PM

Mr. Sick - O

I am not the one who mentioned an ex-cop in another state - don't recall who did, just know it wasn't me. You can read back and see. And I agree that you would be the last person to have on a jury. Your reading comprehension level is low, you jump to conclusions, and you falsely accuse people.

Whether I have credibility with someone like you is the least of my concerns. I put myself at risk by posting here, because I haven't always been brave when it came to being willing to take the witness stand, if called. Because other women who have survived close encounters with Darrell Rice, like Yvonne and Carmelita, have been braver than I, it is the least I can do, at this point in time.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/15/2009 4:24:57 PM

possible witness, I apologize. It was Ankle Monitor who made the claim. And it is Ankle Monitor who keeps ignoring the question.

So, Ankle Monitor, who is the ex-cop who is in jail in another state for murder.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 4:56:05 PM

SickO I don't have to tell you a darn thing. I like PW could care less about my credibility in your eyes. You are the one that seems so holier than thou. You think you are so smart, do your research and maybe you will find out who it is. It can't be that hard, as I was able to find out. I will not divulge his information as I do not want a lawsuit filed against me as he has not been charged with these crimes. Why don't you just ignore me and go on thinking I do not know what I am talking about.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/15/2009 5:40:11 PM

Well, let me rephrase the question now that we have established the fact you have researched the ex-cop and know for a fact that he is in jail in another state for murder. Who announced he is a suspect in cases similar to those Rice has been named a suspect in? But before answering of course, if he has NOT been named as a suspect by an official law enforcement source, I too would not mention his name. Especially if your information is "hearsay" a/k/a "grapevine", that would most certainly be grounds for a lible suit.

I'll keep looking. But I simply have not been able to Google or otherwise find a Virginia ex-cop in jail in another state for murder.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 5:52:24 PM

Sicko, "he" is not a suspect in similar cases, he is a suspect in some of "the" cases. I will not divulge his information or my source. I could tell you that my source is a very credible one, someone that knows more than you do but you would not believe me so I will not bother. My best suggestion is for you to keep looking and "maybe" you will find him.

CopOr NoCop4/15/2009 6:06:50 PM

Well, as much as I hate to agree with any kind of "SickO", I have to say that I have been googling for days and cannot find any former police officer from any state serving time in either North or South Carolina for voluntary manslaughter for any crime even remotely similar to any of the crimes for which Darrell David Rice has been named a suspect. I have found approximately ten over the last ten years one shot his own brother, domestic violence, etc. Therefore, I am also starting to wonder if it's accurate and also question whether there are people trying to take the focus here off of Darrell David Rice and his vicious attack on Yvonne Malbasha and the other crimes for which he has been suspected.

I have been following news stories about Darrell David Rice for years and there is one case in particular I am anxious to see solved. That is what led me to this page. Of course, I would like to see all the cases solved and the more predators off the street and locked up permanently, the better off we all are as a society, IMO.

I would like to strongly caution Possible Witness against giving any personal information to Ankle Monitor or anyone else, regardless of how they may come across on an Internet comment board. There are a lot of nuts out there and the most dangerous ones often come across initially as quite charming.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 6:11:19 PM

It might be hard to find information on the internet on this person because the county he was charged in just happens to be one that does not provide internet records. I guess some of the Carolina's are still in the dark ages. Common sense should tell you that I certainly would not make something up that deflected from DDR's guilt. I personally have my doubts that he is innocent of many of the crimes he has been associated with.

Guilty As Charged4/15/2009 6:29:15 PM

Well, I don't know who did what, but I feel strongly that Richard Marc Evonitz was not responsible for any of the crimes that Darrell David Rice has been suspected of. Evonitz had a separate MO and he was a pedophile. Darrell David Rice's legal team tried to point the finger at Evonitz, which I found to be absurd, as his victims were children. However, Darrell David Rice's known and definite victim that he is convicted of attacking is a grown woman.

Not Quite Charming Ankle4/15/2009 6:39:11 PM

I totally agree Guilty As Charged. I think one way to solve the murder of the girls in the park is to find the belongings that are missing. I do not think it has ever been divulged what the items are but from everything I have read, some of Julie's things are missing. As far as a print or hair left at the scene that does not belong to DDR, that is not surprising. That hair is not necessarily from the killer.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/15/2009 7:11:34 PM

Ahh, another can of worms! Didn't I read somewhere that Evonitz's DNA was never submitted for testing in some of the other unsolved attacks and murders? If so, can anybody explain why?

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/15/2009 7:24:48 PM

quote, Ankle Monitor, Feb 15, 2009, 5:52:24 PM: "Sicko, (the ex-cop) is not a suspect in similar cases, he is a suspect in some of 'the' cases. I could tell you that my source is a very credible one....."

------------------------------

So why has this not been released to the public or law enforcement? Knowledge of the ex-cop being a suspect in some of the crimes could possibly prompt the one single tip that law enforcement needs in solving some of these unsolved assaults and murders. America's Most Wanted has solved crimes on nothing more than tips people figured would amount to diddly squat.

In my humble opinion, law enforcement needs to look into this ex-cop and research his whereabouts during the time frames of the unsolved assaults and murders.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 7:49:42 PM

To the best of my knowledge, law enforcement knows about this guy.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/15/2009 7:56:27 PM

Why don't we assume they don't? it doesn't cost a penny to call the Task Force and at least speak to them. I would start with the Virginia State Police hotline listed in the Alicia Showalter Reynolds case .... 1-800-572-2260

true facts4/15/2009 8:08:40 PM

Unfortunately it seems like the FBI has a history of giving out very little information about cases. I believe they do this so that when a suspect confesses, they will have information that only the perpetrator should possess. However, I personally believe this tactic has caused many of their cases to go cold and remain unsolved. As stated with shows like America's Most Wanted, which has been hugely successful in solving crimes, sometimes it's just one clue that was needed to break the case. Therefore, the tight-lipped FBI investigations can be extremely frustrating and unsuccessful. I have wondered many times if the Shenandoah killings would have been solved a long time ago if it weren't for the fact that it was investigated by bumbling park rangers and the FBI. Given that fact, I find it amazing that dozens of useless male hairs weren't found at that crime scene. I used to think Darrell David Rice probably isn't smart or sophisticated enough to leave no trace of himself at that crime scene. Sadly, I am now more inclined to believe that it is more likely that the park rangers and FBI were not smart enough to find the clues and traces, which may have been abundant, left at that gruesome and tragic scene. Remember, the inept park rangers initially said they thought it was a murder-suicide. How well did they preserve the evidence at the scene of what they thought was a murder-suicide for the FBI and how many people were trampling through those woods. As someone else said, it was Darrell David Rice who was captured on video entering the park on the days those women were believed to have been viciously and heinously butchered, not Evonitz, nor some phantom cop. We also know that the Shenandoah National Park was Darrell David Rice's hunting ground while he was preying on women when he attacked Yvonne Malbasha.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 8:28:26 PM

One of the people trampling through those woods was Darrell David Rice. He was caught on camera going in and out of the park numerous times at the time of the murders and during the investigation. He was there when the victim's dog was found. He denied being there certain days, yet they had him on camera. If he didn't have anything to hide, why did he lie? The camera didn't lie. Too bad the one camera was inoperable.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/15/2009 9:16:04 PM

I just don't recall all the facts from these numerous unsolved cases. If we know that the Shenandoah National Park was Darrell David Rice's hunting ground, how did he become a suspect in all of the 29 North events? Was it simply law enforcement trying to clear unsolved cases with his name?

illogical leap4/15/2009 9:20:26 PM

Who says a predator cannot have more than one hunting ground?

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 9:25:52 PM

Darrell was living in Columbia Maryland at the time and to get to his father's house, it is a straight shot down Rt. 29. He was identified as being a Rt. 29 stalker as well as suspected of the Rt. 29 murder of Alicia Showalter Reynolds. Take a look at the map of the stalkings and murders and they are all in close proximity of his father's house and Rt. 29. It is very common for serial killers to frequent an area they are familiar with, it does not mean it will be the only area where they will commit crimes.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 9:34:12 PM

And before SickO starts with the Identification thing, take a look at DDR when he committed the crimes compared to when he was charged with them. HE LOOKS TOTALLY DIFFERENT! His sister looks more like his old pictures than he does. I guess going bald and several years in prison can make a big difference. I was running around the Island one day and saw someone and my stomach almost hurled because it looked like Darrell. It was his sister, not him.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/15/2009 10:28:24 PM

Ankles, you know how I feel about eyewitness identification. Especially after one victim picked out a Virginia state trooper as the person who had attacked and assaulted her. The photo lineup really backfired on the cops when they put an image of one of their own in it.

And as I have said before, anybody who doubts the inaccuracy of most eyewitness identifications needs to read Elizabeth Loftus' book called "Eyewitness Testimony". She is recognized by the courts as an expert in the feild, and she claims eyewitness identification is wrong in over 50% of cases. Is Darrell Rice among the 50% of positive and accurate identifcations, or is he in the 50% of mistaken identifications? Don't put me on a jury and ask me to decide the issue. Any eyewitness identification from any person will never convince me beyond a reasonable doubt.

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 10:39:41 PM

Well seeing as DDR at the time of the lineup looked nothing like he did at the time of the crimes, I guess the Loftus percentage might vary in this instance. If you were in a vehicle and did not see up close the person who was in the truck behind you trying to get you to pull over, it might be harder to identify him. Not all of the witnesses and victims identified the wrong man. How do you explain the crimes he confessed to? Are you going to say he confessed to things he did not do?

Not Quite Charming Ankle4/15/2009 10:54:42 PM

....and he only confessed because they literally caught him redhanded within minutes of the crime as he attempted to leave the park. He had changed his shirt and removed his truck tag in an attempt to avoid detection. Premeditated and planned out. Thank God they got him before he left Shenandoah Park.

not to mention4/15/2009 11:12:03 PM

... not to mention the sick tools of his trade that he was caught with.. thankfully Yvonne Malbasha escaped Darrel David Rice that day

Ankle Monitor4/15/2009 11:23:51 PM

I have to wonder about some of the other murders that took place in that area years before. It seems DDR started stopping for women on the side of the road when he was in high school. He has always looked older than he really is, it is quite possible his victims were mistaken on the age.

About his tools, he is not suppose to be in the presence of weapons but considering they have a firing range set up at his residence and every kitchen has knives.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/16/2009 12:04:31 AM

I feel like we're going in circles here lately. Did Rice confess to anything, or did he accept plea agreements? Refresh my memory please.

A lot of people often accept a plea agreement rather than face a trial. It's called an Alford Plea. (wiki) -- An Alford plea is a plea in criminal court in which the defendant does not admit the act and asserts innocence, but admits that sufficient evidence exists with which the prosecution could likely convince a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty. Upon receiving an Alford plea from a defendant, the court may immediately pronounce the defendant guilty and impose sentence as if the defendant had otherwise been convicted of the crime.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/16/2009 12:08:14 AM

Nevermind. I'm an idiot. :)

The very first paragraph in this story says Rice took an Alford Plea.

Ankle Monitor4/16/2009 12:15:28 AM

He took an alford plea in ONE case. There was more than one case. And I agree, you are an idiot.

possible witness4/16/2009 8:15:14 AM

Thanks for the warning, CopOrNoCop. I am careful not to give indentifying information about where I live or my own case. It is already dangerous enough, because the courts do not protect potential witnesses any more than law enforcement does.

I will defend the FBI, most days, because they are usually working at such a disadvantage, and working against time. I do wish that all the agencies could communicate with each other better, but too often they seem in competition. There are two or three cases, and if just one could be solved, as CopOrNoCop knows, all the others would fall into place, and Rice would be off the streets for good. I have faith that it will happen, but it's still pretty scary, especially while he was out, and now at the prospect of nine months only.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/16/2009 10:27:33 AM

OK Ankles, please refresh my memory as to which criminal charges Rice confessed to.

And possible witness, what did you do in your last reply? Think about it. You have once again announced that Rice is "guilty until proven innocent". There is no such thing as "innocent until proven guilty" in this country any longer. This is the problem I have had with this thread since it's birth. Everybody wants to clear as many unsolved crimes as they can by simply attaching the name Darrell Rice to them. And when I say "everybody", I am including law enforcement as well. They tried to clear the park murders by indicting Rice.

Ankle Monitor4/16/2009 10:45:05 AM

SickO, I see your reading comprehension has not improved. You really should work on that, then you would not have so many idiotic questions.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/16/2009 10:57:05 AM

It's a very simple question.... please tell me which crimes Rice confessed to, was charged in, and was convicted of.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/16/2009 11:01:04 AM

It's a simple question. Please tell me which crimes Rice confessed in.

Seems to me like it would be easier to answer the question than to sit around dreaming up so many insults.

Ankle Monitor4/16/2009 11:13:24 AM

The answers are there for you to read more than once, you are just so fixated on trying to deem every criminal innocent that you miss the important stuff. Your agenda is preventing you from gaining further knowledge, that is not a problem I can solve.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/16/2009 11:42:18 AM

I don't recall any cases in which Rice confessed. If he did, he must be a bigger idiot than I thought he was.

Let me show you a quote from The Washington Post ---> "The two women identified Rice in a photo lineup as the man -- or resembling the man -- who pulled them over, according to court documents."

See the magic words there? Rice resembled the man who attacked them. This would never convince me beyond a reasonable doubt of Rice's guilt. Especially after another woman picked out a full time active Virginia state trooper as her assailant in another lineup.

I have no feelings for Rice whatsoever, good or bad. But I am fixated on not blaming Rice for every unsolved assault or murder that has taken place in the last two decades within a 200 mile radius. Especially since some of the eyewitness identifications of the suspects have been so haphazard and incorrect. And that's exactly what everybody is trying to do, put him in jail for life for as many crimes as they can get by with attaching his name to.

I subscribe to the theory that any man is innocent until proven guilty. Even if Darrell Rice is the Devil in disguise, he is innocent unil proven guilty.

too late4/16/2009 11:59:05 AM

Sorry, SickO, he's already been proven guilty. That is why he is in jail, wears an ankle monitor, has a babysitter, and is registered as a sex offender.

possible witness4/16/2009 12:09:44 PM

I have not said he is guilty until proven innocent. I have said he has not yet been proven guilty, but based on my past experience, I believe he will be. I don't know of which crime or crimes that will happen.

You've named yourself sick of those of us who would like to see him brought to justice, so I'd suggest you find another blog to flame. You are just interrupting our communication and, I suspect, trying everything you can to keep it from happening. Maybe you're just a show-off, like those men who cannot sit in conversation with women without taking over.

Mustang4/16/2009 12:18:57 PM

True Facts: It rained 4 or 5 days before the girls in SNP were found. Most of the trace evidence was washed away. That double murder was never characterized as a "Murder-Suicide". Both of the girls throats were slit.

Sick: Rice pled guilty to attempted kidnapping of Yvonne Malbasha, he got hammered for it (10 years). He took an Alford plea in the Shomo case and sentenced to time served for that.

true facts4/16/2009 1:20:16 PM

Mustang, the murders were in fact immediately characterized by the Shenandoah park rangers as a murder-suicide. They used this as an excuse for not notifying park-goers that they were in any danger. Obviously we know that it was a double murder and that both victims were actually bound so the murder-suicide talk by park rangers was absolutely ridiculous. That's exactly why I brought it up; I was illustrating how completely inept the responders and investigators were at the crime scene. More importantly, my point was: if these bumbling inept idiots were walking around the crime scene initially talking about the possibility of a murder-suicide where both women were clearly gagged and bound, they were probably not all that interested in preserving forensic evidence. Therefore, add in the week of rain and we cannot be shocked that so little evidence was found and it certainly does not mean that Darrell David Rice was not there, especially since we already know that he WAS in fact there on those dates as evidenced by security camera footage. We also know that he has a history of preying on and attacking women in that park.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/16/2009 1:27:09 PM

Mustang, entering a plea of guilty has nothing to do with making a confession. I want Ankles to tell me what cases he confessed in.

Furthermore, entering a guilty plea in a plea agreement is not quite the same as entering a plea of guilty and acknowledging he did the crime.

Mustang4/16/2009 3:08:23 PM

True Facts: Please tell me where I can read that the NPS said it was a murder-suicide...I don't think you can.

Sick: Rice was originally indicted on a whole slew of charges, kidnapping, assault with intent to murder, possession of marajuana and he ended up pleading guilty to an information (kidnapping)....my take is he and his attorney thought he would get less time for that. He was sentenced to 135 months, the max (I think) the Judge could give him. IMHO, pleading guilty IS acknowledging that you did the crime.

Ankle Monitor4/16/2009 3:34:24 PM

Rice also told the authorities, I believe the FBI that he likes to harrass women on the road. They asked him where he liked to do this and his answer was " Rt. 29 " , which just happens to be the road he traveled from his home in Columbia Maryland to his fathers in Virginia.

As stated previously, numerous times, it was Rice on the camera footage going in and out of the park during the time of the dual murder, not Evonitz or the now former cop.

true facts4/16/2009 3:44:00 PM

Mustang, I doubt you can read it anywhere online as it was on the local 11 o'clock news the night of the horrific discovery in an interview with a park ranger.

Ankle Monitor4/16/2009 3:53:27 PM

Actually true facts, I thought I read that somewhere, that it was the excuse not to notify anyone in the park.

Mustang4/16/2009 4:22:22 PM

IMHO, Evonitz had nothing to do with the SNP murders. His MO is sexual assault and murder of children. You are right, Ankle Monitor, that Rice and his truck went in and out of the park on days before the girls were killed and after...and so what if the the hair(s)and its DNA don't match Rice? It's not like it is semen evidence from a rape.

Ankle Monitor4/17/2009 4:33:48 PM

Even though DDR has a hatred for women and has attacked women, he has also harrassed males in the past. He has stated he went after women because they were more vulnerable or because he liked the way they looked. I would not put it past him to go after anyone, anyone he deems vulnerable. Someone with his lack of self control and mental illness could possible snap and go after someone he knows and loves.

possible witness4/22/2009 12:00:32 PM

I don't go along with that reasoning, necessarily. I worry much more that there will be bodies found, whether or not they can ever be traced to him. As long as he still prides himself on not getting caught, he will not do anything so obvious. Nor would he want to lose his mother's good graces.

But thank heavens he was caught at the parole violations. Otherwise he would have been scot free in July. Wow. What a thought. As it is, it looks like there will only be two years of supervision, once he is released again, instead of four.

Ankle Monitor4/22/2009 3:58:23 PM

Most likely he will continue to go after strangers and unsuspecting women. However in the past he has harrassed and assaulted women and men that he knew, take his former co-workers for instance. Someone with his mental illness, lack of self control and explosive uncontrollable rage could possibly go after anyone. I don't assume or think that anyone is safe from him. Apparently I am not the only one to think this as his neice lived elsewhere, not in the home with him on Kent Island.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/22/2009 5:16:55 PM

In all seriousness, this conversation is getting old and boring now, and I think you two need some counseling in dealing with your fear of this man. The sooner you seek such conseling, the better off you will be.

possible witness4/22/2009 6:59:55 PM

No, we will be better off when you leave us alone. What's it to you if we share information here? I'm beginning to think you're a close friend, relative, or attorney to Mr. Rice. Why else would you check this site so avidly and belittle our concerns? My fear of this man is based on real experience, so you might as well give up flaming and trolling on his behalf.

Ankle Monitor4/22/2009 8:40:35 PM

He might be from the Virginia lawschool that is trying to help incarcerated innocent criminals go free. Hey Sicko, DDR is not one of them, pick someone else.

I wish PW would spend the next 8 months learning to shoot a firearm and handle weapons. That would be time well spent.

I can only hope that the next victim of DDR's will have a big surprise for him.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/22/2009 9:21:14 PM

Now we agree on something. The courts have ruled that cops have no obligation to protect you. If the cops can arrive in time, more power to them. If they can't, they simply supervise cleaning up the aftermath. Best advice out there is for people to arm themselves so as to protect themselves and their families.

But we still disagree on one thing though... I hope the next victim is armed and has a surprise for the assailant. Unlike you two, I don't assume the next victim will be that of DDR's. Ya see, you two are simply fixated on DDR.

I can assure you I do not know Darrell Rice, I am not a close friend or distant friend of Darrell Rice, am not related to Darrell Rice, etc.... If he came to my door with his daughter selling Girl Scout cookies, I would probably buy some without even knowing or caring it's him with his daughter. (Does he have a daughter?) I again do nothing more than object to his name being dragged through the mud day after day in this thread for crimes he has never been charged with or convicted of. Nor dragging his name through the mud for crimes that we think he may or may not commit in the future.

Now, based on my knowledge of this "real experience" you speak of, I can assure you that people who have constantly labeled another person as a criminal in repeated Internet postings have successfully been sued. All I am saying is be real careful in your choice of wording. Friendly advice, that's all.

possible witness4/23/2009 4:02:40 AM

How would you have knowledge of my experience?

Ankle Monitor4/23/2009 9:17:37 AM

DDR has been charged with crimes, just not successfully convicted of all of them, that does not mean he is innocent. Once again Sicko, your poor reading comprehension is evident, this article and blog are about DDR, not other criminals.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/23/2009 11:00:41 AM

Well, actually, this blog is about 2 people who dislike Darrell Rice with a passion annd have dragged his name through the mud in this thread alone for 9 months now. Trust me, I like to hear myself talk. But when I finally get bored it usually means the thread is nothing more than beating a dead horse.

possible witness, yes, I should explain. I wasn't very clear. It happens when a hilarious TV show is on (reality show encouraging 20 men to charm a lady old enough to be their mother), on the phone, and trying to eat a late dinner all at the same time. You spoke of your fear of Darrell Rice as being based on "real experience". As in a true story. I was speaking of another true story, people being successfully sued for rambling on about an innocent person being a criminal whether the criminal justice system could successfully prosecute him or not. I think you'll find there is a different standard in lible when the police label somebody as a suspect and when civilians lable the same person as a suspect in a dozen other cases the police haven't even mentioned his name in. If this thread was about a person who has the ways and means, I suspect both of you would have identified and sued by now for beating this dead horse and dragging a man's name through the mud in this one thread over and over and over for the last nine months. Both of you have said just about as much as there is to be said about Darrell Rice. What else could possibly be said about the man? Then just when we thought we had seen it all, the icing on the cake comes along... "Darrell Rice's next victim". My God, the man is guilty before the crime has even occurred now!

As far as the park murders, they never had enough evidence to proceed against Rice, and they knew it. In my opinion, they were hoping for a plea agreement so they could clear two more cases at Darrell's expense.

possible witness4/23/2009 1:38:30 PM

Interesting theory. Interesting attempt at intimidation. Don't worry - I will give no specifics.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/23/2009 3:36:21 PM

I guess it's not really a theory, it's based on years of my personal observation in various courtrooms. Some cops often don't care who they charge for a crime, as long as they can write the crime off as "cleared by arrest" and make themselves lood good in the process. Especially when a cop is looking for fast advancement or promotion within their department. A framed newspaper article reading "Darrell Rice Sentenced To Life In Prison In Park Murders" looks good hanging on the wall of a retired cop or prosecutor as well. Look at the people that were days from the death sentence when DNA cleared them of all charges. (Washingone was the most recent in Virginia) Now imagine if it was your father or brother! DNA has cleared a lot of people who were falsely convicted of crimes by overzealous cops and prosecutors.

Back on topic though, in this real world it sure would have looked good if the prosecutor could have forced Darrell Rice to choose between "death" by jury, or "life in prison" in a plea agreement. As soon as they found out Darrell Rice wasn't going to enter a plea agreement, guess what? They dropped the charges. Didn't come as any surprise to me. And there's no framed newspaper articles of his conviction for anybody to hang on their walls.

possible witness4/23/2009 4:22:08 PM

. . . yet.

Ankle Monitor4/23/2009 8:30:58 PM

The night is young.

possible witness4/24/2009 11:00:23 AM

Don't make silly jokes, Ankle. I am not libeling nor defaming anyone, but if you do this bravado thing, it makes us both look bad. I have no desire for Rice to be convicted of anything he has not done. I have to go away from here now. It isn't safe for me to keep posting. Take care of yourself, and of KI, as the year wears on.

Kristina4/24/2009 11:58:09 AM

Possible Witness...We all know you won't stay away. You save this every 3-4 months. You'll be back. Neither you nor Ankle can help yourselves!

Ankle Monitor4/24/2009 2:37:59 PM

Kristina, I am not here looking for help and I have not said I am going away.

Possible Witness, you going away is exactly what someone wants you to do, it is pretty evident by some of the comments and the attempted intimidation. Don't let them scare you off. I think they are more in fear of you and your knowledge, not the other way around.

As far as my " the night is young " comment, that is referring to the possiblity that there is still time for more evidence and more convictions. My comment had nothing to do with silly jokes or bravado.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/24/2009 3:45:25 PM

More evidence? It's my understanding that whatever evidence could have been recovered was pretty much destroyed when the scene was labeled a double suicide or whatever by the Park Rangers.

Have you ever seen a cop show on TV where a seasoned detective walks in and asks, "Who are these people? Get these people out of my crime scene!" That's the image I visualize when when I hear people mention the crime scene was being stampled upon by a wild heard of elephants who thought it was a double suicide. Is that rumor even true?

Nobody has attempted to intimidate anybody here or scare the two of you off. I have suggested that perhaps you exercise caution in the wording of your discussions. As strange as the timing may seem, I just today received in the mail a judge's ruling in a "he said, she said" case that would knock your socks off. Those ole "he said, she said" cases will burn a person up faster than an ant under a magnifying glass!

Ankle Monitor4/24/2009 9:23:33 PM

There is always a possibility that evidence could be found in the future, even something that was "washed away". It was reported that some of Julie's items were missing. Serial killers often keep items belonging to their victims. Don't forget there are also close to 2 dozen Rt. 29 stalkings/murder that have not been solved. Cold cases can be solved.

Sick Of The Local Rambos4/24/2009 10:47:14 PM

So now you believe a serial killer was involved? Is that what you're saying?

I don't think most of you realize how low the percentages are in actually solving crimes? It's amazing how inefficient law enforcement agencies really are. Never hold your breath on anything being solved.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2004_UCR_crime_clearance.jpg

2004 clearance rates as an example

--Violent Crimes---

murder, 62% solved

assault, 55% solved

rape, 41% solved

robbery, 26%

---Property Crimes---

larceny, 18%

motor vehicle theft, 13% solved

burglary, 12%

possible witness4/27/2009 1:42:51 AM

I'm always amazed at how personally people take this. Why be nasty to me? Kristina? Are you really so sure that you're right?

Sick - O, of course I know how unlikely it is that Darrell Rice will ever get convicted again, no matter how many individual women know what he is capable of, and no matter how many time he may have reoffended while he was out. So can you really blame me, when the chances are that he'll be out again in a few months, for wanting to know where he is and wanting to make sure that women living in his vicinity know not to go alone on the local trails or pull over for a stranger? You can bet that Yvonne Malbasha wouldn't even want to be on the same continent with him if he wasn't being monitored.

Been A While5/31/2009 3:50:54 AM

PW: Do not go away. Do not live in fear. Speak your truth.

Sicko: You have serious issues, do not know the facts of DDR's cases to which you refer, and obviously have your own bizarre and personal agenda. If it's true that you are not biased and pro-DDR, then stop defending him long enough to read up on the predatory violent crimes of which he HAS been convicted. Your posts are inaccurate and slanted.

Kristina: Clearly you must be trolling and personally connected to the convict DDR.

Future Evidence: I do believe there were/are personal items (yes, probably "trophies") missing and hopefully these will be found, solving the park case. It is rare that someone would commit a truly hideous and heinous crime like that and not have other victims.

Any other possible victims or anyone with any information authorities should know about Darrell David Rice or any of the crimes discussed here: Please look deep within yourself and have the courage to come forward and do the right thing.

Even if you are a family member, think for a moment how you would feel if you were a family member of one of the victims instead of the guy in prison.

Finally, to everyone: don't hate.

possible witness6/1/2009 9:42:11 AM

Thank you.

94 Days9/16/2009 10:50:19 PM

94 Days before DDR is released from prison.

Says Who?9/30/2009 1:36:10 AM

Where is this information posted? Is this information reliable? What's the lastest with that convict?

80 Days10/1/2009 4:44:05 PM

He has about 80 days before he is released again. I am not sure about his GPS and other monitoring when he gets out. Local law enforcement and the various Maryland Government authorities are not privvy to the information.

80 Days?10/1/2009 4:50:47 PM

Darrell David Rice, who violated the conditions of his probation following a decade in prison for attempted kidnapping, was sentenced to an additional nine months behind bars on Tuesday, April 7 in federal court. Rice was charged with repeatedly watching soft-porn on cable and smoking marijuana; abstaining from both were conditions of his probation.

Somewhere I got the idea he was in until about December 20th but he may be getting out sooner. Who Knows?

The Hook posted10/1/2009 5:00:40 PM

http://readthehook.com/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/monitoring-extended-for-rice/#more-1522

Trial Report10/1/2009 5:09:30 PM

http://readthehook.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/26/rice-remains-jailed-awaiting-trial/

This was the article on the last violation and court order.

possible witness10/2/2009 1:26:58 PM

His release date has been set for December 18.

oh yay10/2/2009 11:31:53 PM

Well then.. Merry Christmas to all the women in the D.C. area... let's hope they all live to see it...

Keep Us Posted10/2/2009 11:38:01 PM

I wonder if he will have the GPS device. I hope The Hook continues to keep us posted. I know I can't be the only woman who feels less safe with him loose in society.

possible witness10/20/2009 4:59:55 PM

Originally, he was to be monitored until 2010. Surely that will be honored.

59 Days10/20/2009 5:35:02 PM

What date in 2010, in Jan.? That is not too far away, just a few months. That would not be good to have him get out in December and get the GPS off in a matter of weeks after that.

Ankle Monitor10/21/2009 11:16:13 AM

One would hope it would be on at least until the beginning of the summer. Even better would be an extension due to his numerous violations and current incarceration.

Not Looking Good11/5/2009 5:27:59 PM

Prepare for disappointment, I think it is coming.

Arianna11/7/2009 2:17:02 PM

was her released now? because if he was there is a possible connection between him and another killing?

Arianna11/7/2009 2:17:08 PM

was he released now? because if he was there is a possible connection between him and another killing?

what now?11/7/2009 4:50:35 PM

What other killing?

Gasbag Self Ordained Expert11/7/2009 6:49:18 PM

Mr/Mrs/Miss what now?, it appears that "Arianna" is implying that the Morgan Harrington case is now classified as official homicide. He or she is the type of person who blame anything and everything that happens for the next 50 years on Darrell Rice.

The police haven't even classified Morgan Harrington as a homicide yet. And yet Darrell Rice is getting getting credit for it as another murder under his cap.

Not Yet11/8/2009 10:39:21 PM

Darrell has about another 6 weeks before he will be out of prison.

possible witness11/18/2009 6:09:36 PM

Let the countdown begin!

Home Sweet Home11/19/2009 12:27:35 PM

Where is he going to live? That is the question.

possible witness12/1/2009 1:34:55 AM

He'll likely be with his mother or sister again, but the story is that his mother no longer lives on Kent Island. It looks as if he has been classified a sex offender, which means he'll have to register an address within 72 hours of being released. He's also supposed to be monitored by GPS for 24 months. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

Not Yet12/1/2009 8:02:01 PM

Rumor has it he is not coming back to Kent Island to live although I would imagine he would be visiting. I wonder if he will have the same employer as before. Most likely someone in the family got him that job and I suspect it might be waiting for him. I bet he is moving somewhere near his old neighborhood. Happy Holidays!

Not Yet12/1/2009 8:16:02 PM

His mom might have moved to Jessup, Maryland, that is not far from Columbia, Maryland, where DDR was living when some of the crimes were committed. Rt. 29 goes from Columbia, Maryland south to where his father was living and where many of the crimes happened. Rt. 29 stalkings/murder.

Not Yet Again12/1/2009 10:02:13 PM

I wonder what happened that he now has to register as a sex offender. You would think something would have to have happened in order for them to change that. I will be curious to see what is posted on the sex offender site.

Doublewide bought in the end of May in Hanover/Jessup Maryland in Brentwood Manor.

possible witness12/12/2009 9:22:56 PM

I agree that it will be interesting to see if he has been classified as a predator or an offender and whether the term "sexually violent" is applied to either term. Attempted sexual violence could do it, or something related to the porn charges from last spring, perhaps.

Not Yet12/12/2009 10:40:10 PM

I wonder if he failed another penile test and that is why. One would think if it had to do with the porn charges from last spring that he would have had to register on the sexual predator list back then. Something "new" must have happened.

possible witness12/15/2009 2:40:14 PM

It doesn't really matter - what matters is to find out where he is, as soon as possible, and let the community know. I will post anything I find out, and hope that others will do the same. Even if we have to distribute warnings by hand, his presence must be made known.

Not Yet12/15/2009 8:03:29 PM

I posted where his mother lives. Her name is in the phonebook complete with address. She bought the doublewide in the end of May. It is a cute little 2 bedroom place with pink countertops and woods behind it. It is a place where she has to pay ground rent so she will not come up as property owner on Real Property Search.

possible witness12/16/2009 7:21:40 AM

Much as I want the community to be safe from her son, I find it a little spooky to know the color of her countertops. I think that's called trespassing, if you got close enough to look in the windows. Just wanted to say that I don't condone that.

Not Yet12/17/2009 8:02:20 AM

LOL I did not trespass, I saw the ad on the internet from the realtor. Lighten up on me girl, I am not the one you need to worry about. You wanted to know, I found out and told you.

possible witness12/17/2009 8:48:25 AM

Sorry - easily freaked out these days.

Not Yet12/24/2009 9:29:08 AM

Does not look like he has registered on the sexual predator sites. I wonder if someone gave you wrong information.

possible witness12/26/2009 10:10:00 AM

He knows he has to register. If he's chosen not to, he will have to be found at some point and then deal with the legal consequences.


Your Name:
Your Email (optional):
Comment:
Word Count:
0
500 word limit
Image Verification:
Please type the letters above:
*  People say the darndest things, but if you use language stronger than "darn," ethnically or racially disparaging language, or compare people to Hitler, you may find that we've deleted the comment and/or blocked you from further commenting. Ditto for most unverified information, gross insults, potentially libelous statements, and veering off the topic. To avoid spam, all comments containing more than two weblinks are placed into a holding tank.



© 2002-2008 Better Publications LLC - The Hook - 100 Second Street NW - Charlottesville, VA 22902 - 434-295-8700 (fax: 434-295-8097) :Login: