Hook Logo
Search
February 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Hook Webcam downtown charlottesville Click for Charlottesville, Virginia Forecast

COVER- Cop out? What have police learned after last fall's crosswalk incidents?

published 12/4/2008 12:00:00 AM

 


A year after the crosswalk incident, Gerry Mitchell says the effects of his injuries linger.
PHOTO BY WILL WALKER

Last fall, in the space of six weeks, a pair of incidents between pedestrians in crosswalks and police shook Charlottesville and sparked protests and petitions demanding police accountability and greater emphasis on pedestrian rights and safety.

 

One year later, in the wake of those incidents, the city is spending $700,000 on pedestrian safety improvements while Police Chief Tim Longo has formed a citizen police advisory panel and boldly claims the department is a "leading advocate for pedestrian safety."

Critics, however, say these efforts are nothing more than a "band-aid" on a broken system. They blast the advisory panel as "toothless" and "meaningless," and say improved crosswalks and sidewalks are welcome-- but that they don't address the police cover-up they say they witnessed last fall.

"Nothing has changed," charges Jim McKinley-Oakes, a licensed clinical social worker, who says his faith in the Charlottesville police force was shattered by what happened to his friend, Gerry Mitchell.

****

For Mitchell, the memory of November 5, 2007 is especially vivid. But should it ever dim, he'll find a reminder in a police dash cam video.

The video-- which the Hook posted to YouTube after its release earlier this year-- has now garnered more than 60,000 views and shows an Albemarle County police cruiser striking Mitchell's wheelchair from behind as he attempted to cross West Main Street that sunny fall morning on his way home from running errands. 

If the accident itself was upsetting, it was what happened later that day that spawned true outrage. Hours after he'd been lifted out of the street by a good samaritan and by the Albemarle County officer who struck him, Mitchell-- still being treated for his injuries in a UVA Medical Center emergency room-- was issued a ticket by the Charlottesville police, a maneuver one lawyer blasted as a purely defensive move.

"They treated me like a dog," says Mitchell, a 54-year-old Yale-educated artist. 

For weeks following the incident, Chief Longo declined comment, deferring to his officers, even as cries for an official apology rose to a roar.

But on December 12-- six days after the Hook published a cover story about the incident-- Longo issued a memo to City Council that cemented for many the idea that the Charlottesville Police Department would never take responsibility.

In it, Longo-- who had at last watched the dash-cam video-- wrote that Mitchell's chair "rolled forward several feet," and that Mitchell then "left the chair and fell to the pavement."

The memo further claimed Mitchell had appeared so suddenly that the officer hadn't had time to react-- claims that would be contradicted one month later when the video was made public.

The video clearly shows the front of the cruiser as it turns left from Fourth Street onto West Main Street as Mitchell was crossing the east side of the intersection heading south. In the video, Mitchell is plainly visible even though the dash-cam captured only a narrow view directly in front of the car.

Longo claimed that the officer couldn't have seen him.

"That doesn't make sense to me unless he has zero peripheral vision," said pedestrian activist Kevin Cox at the time the video was released. "If his peripheral vision is that limited, he shouldn't be driving."

Also not mentioned in Longo's description: the audio recording of "My Humps" by the Black Eyed Peas, which kicks in immediately after impact and led some to question whether the officer had been distracted.

According to then-County police spokesman Lt. John Teixeira, that music was playing on the radio-- not a department violation-- and the video's audio recording kicks in only when the cruiser's lights are activated.

At a City Council meeting in mid-December, Councilors listened to pointed questions from citizens who demanded to know who had ordered the ticket for Mitchell and why no official apology had been forthcoming.

But Longo's memo, especially, prompted outrage from those who wondered how Longo could possibly claim-- more than a month after the accident and after the Hook's cover story which included interviews with two men who saw the accident-- that there hadn't been witnesses.

An unrepentant Longo claimed the memo was written based on the information he'd had from his officers. One year later, his defiance remains.

"I stand by that statement," Longo says in an emailed response. "Officers often have to make judgment calls based on the information they have at the moment. I was not present at the scene of this incident, and it is not my practice or appropriate for me to engage in second-guessing any of my officers through the media on any judgment call. "

The ticketing of Mitchell was not the first time police were asked to defend their actions last fall.

*****

Blair Austin will never forget the night of September 29, 2007. That was the night the young woman, celebrating her fiance's birthday-- and not yet aware that she was pregnant with her first child-- encountered Charlottesville Police Officer Mike Flaherty, in what would soon be seen as the opening salvo in the war of the crosswalks. 

As Flaherty accelerated down Second Street past the Water Street Parking Garage, Austin and her fiance, Iraq war veteran Richard Silva, along with a group of other pedestrians, entered a crosswalk on Water Street. As the fast-moving but non-sirening cruiser turned from Second Street onto Water Street, Flaherty slammed his brakes to avoid the pedestrians, whom he nearly struck. Silva put up his hands and, according to witnesses, shouted something to the effect of "Slow your a** down."

Witnesses would later testify that Officer Flaherty appeared angry as he exited the vehicle and immediately arrested Silva. During the trial the followed, some witnesses said that when Austin approached Flaherty asking why he was arresting her fiance, Flaherty responded by shoving her to the ground.

As witness outrage mounted, a bystander called 911 to report alleged police brutality.

Flaherty's behavior seemed inexplicable to witnesses, who wondered why an officer suddenly seemed more interested in arresting a happy young couple than in responding to whatever call had prompted his rapid turn. Austin, too, was arrested and charged with obstruction of justice, a felony. 

The birthday celebration ended with the future husband and wife spending the night behind bars.

At their November 27 court date in Charlottesville District Court-- held just days before Silva was due to leave for six months in Afghanistan-- Judge Bob Downer acquitted both Silva and Austin of all charges. But the judge stopped far short of reprimanding police or suggesting Flaherty had done anything wrong. Instead, he said, the Commonwealth simply hadn't proven its case.

The witnesses, who were strangers to the couple until the incident, said they were stunned that no one would hold the officer accountable.

"I had never seen anything like it before," said Liberty University student Anjani Solonen, who was visiting Charlottesville that night with three friends.

"It was completely ridiculous," added Carrie Stuart, visiting from California. "The officer was completely out of line."

At trial, Flaherty said that he never struck Silva, that she must have fallen when she shoved her away from his impending arrest, something he noted is part of standard police training. As for his change of focus to arresting the couple, Flaherty admitted that he chose to abort his emergency response to deal with a matter of "public safety."

 

Is it enough?

If the two crosswalk incidents marked D-Days, the battle hasn't ended. In July, Chief Longo unveiled his long-awaited response to those who called for additional oversight. He would create the Charlottesville Police Advisory Panel, which was finally empaneled by City Council in October. The honeymoon was brief.

"I think the police have made it clear that the panel has no oversight and virtually no authority over the police," says McKinley-Oakes. Indeed, Chief Longo has said repeatedly that the panel's mission is to improve communication between the public and police, and that it will not have investigative or disciplinary powers.

Such powers remain in the hands of Chief Longo, who to this day has not revealed how-- or if-- any officers were disciplined following the crosswalk incidents.

 "I do not discuss personnel matters," says Longo, adding that an "internal review" examined the behavior of officers involved in both situations. "Any allegation of policy violations were investigated thoroughly and resolved in a manner consistent with our established procedure."

The public, it seems, must simply trust Longo, which McKinley-Oakes points out means there's nowhere to go if one's complaint is about the chief himself.

Last year, McKinley-Oakes wrote to City Council expressing his concerns about the police department following the Mitchell incident and asking whom he could contact to request an external investigation. Instead of hearing back from Councilors regarding the confidential complaint he thought he was making, McKinley heard from someone else: Chief Longo, to whom one or more councilors had forwarded his complaint.

"I was totally intimidated," says McKinley-Oakes, who had hoped that a police oversight committee would be more than communication or symbolism.

He's not the only person who felt intimidated by Charlottesville police.

One witness to Mitchell's accident, Ben Gathright, says he was frightened in the aftermath of the incident. At the scene, he says, he was the one who insisted that an ambulance be called. He says he asked several officers if they wanted a statement, and provided his contact information twice-- yet no statement was taken.

The next day, when he learned that Mitchell, who was infected with HIV in 1981 and has fought a slew of health problems related to AIDS for nearly 20 years, had been rehospitalized, he was stunned and called the Charlottesville police again.

"I thought they should know," he says.

The response to his phone call was less than welcoming, he alleges, as an officer berated him for failing to give a statement at the scene. After the Hook's first story came out, Gathright says, he was finally called down to the Charlottesville police station to give a statement. He was given something in return-- several unpaid parking tickets. And more.

That same week, a criminal charge based on an alleged bad check Gathright wrote more than a year earlier unexpectedly appeared on the Charlottesville court docket. The bounced check had cleared long before, when it was resubmitted, says Gathright, who says he has no other criminal record.

The sudden appearance of the unpaid parking tickets combined with the bad check charge left Gathright so shaken that he stopped returning phone calls from the Hook, as he wondered what else might appear from the Charlottesville PD.

Now living in Boston where he's enrolled in architecture graduate school, Gathright spoke to a reporter by telephone and says he's pleased to hear about the new police advisory board.

But Mitchell's attorney, Richard Armstrong, says the City has missed an opportunity to offer true accountability.

"For a review board to have any teeth," says Armstrong, "they have to have subpoena power, have to be able to force witnesses to come forward. If they don't, it's ultimately powerless and meaningless."

Panel member Jean Clark, a former schoolteacher who also attended the city's Citizen's Police Academy, denies such claims. "There's no need for that at this point in time," says Chase, saying it would be inappropriate for the panel to investigate.

City Councilor Julian Taliaferro-- a former Charlottesville fire chief-- agrees.

"I think it's going to offer the opportunity for the people on this board to voice their opinion to the chief of police, and I think he'll listen," says Taliaferro. "I don't think you can give a board of civilians the power to manage, or make disciplinary decisions."

Not everyone agrees.

"That's ridiculous," says Eduardo Diaz. The immediate past president of the National Association of Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement, or NACOLE, Diaz has been involved in police oversight since 1996 and serves on the Miami-Dade County, Florida police review board. He calls such claims "a natural defense" by law enforcement who don't want civilians meddling in departmental affairs.

"It is a fact that police work and how police do things is a learned phenomenon, and you can learn what the policies are," says Diaz. "The police work for the public, and the public needs to have an opportunity to let police know what kind of policing they want."

 

Railroad crackdown

So are the police giving Charlottesville the kind of policing citizens want? Some of the scores of people ticketed this summer for walking across the railroad tracks near 15th Street might think not. 

"We're paying that officer," said an outraged Marya Dunlap-Brown, after she was ticketed for crossing the tracks on August 13 as she left work at UVA and headed home. Dunlap-Brown said that as Officer Stuart Bruce was writing her ticket, his radio crackled with a report of an in-progress suspected drug deal.

"Get a criminal," said Dunlap-Brown. "Catch someone selling drugs."

Or, even better, says pedestrian activist Kevin Cox, catch a driver failing to yield at a crosswalk.

A Hook Freedom of Information request found that Charlottesville Police, in one five-week span, issued 88 tickets to punish pedestrians who trespassed by stepping over railroad tracks. And yet arrest numbers suggest that Police haven't been as vigilant in protecting pedestrians.

Between January 1 and September 7, a mere 13 tickets were issued to drivers who failed to yield to pedestrians.

Such an enforcement disparity is particularly surprising to pedestrian advocate Cox, who'd been pointing out the discrepancy for months. He showed the Hook a September email from Chief Longo promising a crosswalk crackdown, but as of October 28, Longo said he was unaware of any such stakeouts at crosswalks.

In 2006, the City planted bright yellow signs, a bold Day-Glo statement of support for pedestrians, around the downtown mall, reminding drivers of Virginia law, which requires that they yield.

"It would be nice if they'd enforce it," says Cox.

But to the chief, comparing such enforcement numbers is unfair.

"It is important for our officers to have flexibility in their patrol duties and to enforce the law if they witness citable actions," he says. "That is their responsibility."

Cox-- who says he sees multiple violations of pedestrian safety on his daily five-mile foot commute-- agrees with one aspect of that explanation.

"They'd witness plenty of citable actions," he says, "if they staked out crosswalks." 

 

Moving on

The past year is a blur of health crises for Gerry Mitchell. Days after the incident, he was hospitalized with failing kidneys he blames on the impact from the cruiser. His shoulder was broken, he says, when he was lifted out of the road after being struck, permanently limiting mobility in his right arm, and a series of strokes he suffered in the hospital has caused the permanent loss of use of his right hand.

After the kidney failure, he was hospitalized with gout, which causes debilitating and agonizing joint swelling. Diabetes nearly forced doctors to amputate his right foot. Medication he took caused him to develop cataracts, and he was legally blind for several weeks until surgery restored his vision. 

"People have no idea what I've gone through," says Mitchell.

Charges against him were eventually dropped in early January, after Commonwealth's Attorney Dave Chapman pointed out that the crosswalk signal at the intersection where Mitchell was hit used symbols instead of words-- something Chapman said excluded it from enforcement under Virginia law.

Delegate David Toscano, a former City Councilor, rectified that situation carrying to Richmond a bill that amended the state code to ensure that any tickets issued to pedestrians can be enforced in the future. 

The improvements suggested by a pedestrian safety committee (formed in the wake of the crosswalk incidents) and accepted by City Council means $700,000 will be spent improving certain corridors of the city. Already, several pedestrian crossing signs have been upgraded and now show pedestrians a countdown of seconds remaining until the light changes, helping people determine whether they have enough time to cross. Sidewalks are being repaired-- to the delight of Cox, whose wife is blind-- and the City is running a series of public service ads aimed at increasing driver awareness.

Last spring, Mitchell filed intent to sue against both the county and the city for their respective roles in the incident, but has not formally filed suit against either. His attorney says the County's insurance company is negotiating a settlement based on which of Mitchell's ailments can be directly tied to the accident. That settlement will likely be confidential, says Armstrong.

As for the City, Mitchell says he has decided for now to refrain from filing suit-- in part because of his concern for Ben Gathright, the witness who feared further surprises.

"I realize there was no way to do that without affecting Ben," says Mitchell, "who felt he needed to pull his life back together again." 

Despite his suffering, Mitchell says there have been bright moments, many of them created by the support Mitchell says he received from the community. A benefit concert in February brought about 150 of supporters to the former Prism Coffeehouse and raised approximately $2,000. To this day, Mitchell says, "people stop me on the street."

Still, painful reminders of the incident are strong, and Mitchell, who says his heart is now failing, plans to leave Charlottesville in the near future-- for good. He hopes to move either to Florence, Italy, or to Santa Fe to focus on his art and on several new creative projects.

"I figure I've got about two solid years left," he says. "I feel like I need to have some joy with my work."

The other crosswalk victim says she, too, is trying to put the incident behind her.

"I've decided not to file suit," writes Austin, from her temporary home in Atlanta, where she and her now-five-month-old son are awaiting Silva's return once more-- from another six-month stationing in Afghanistan. When Silva does get back, Austin says there's a good chance she'll return to Charlottesville, where Silva worked previously. She hopes not, though.

"I am not too fond of Charlottesville," she says, adding, "I'm really saddened by the impression that it has left with me." 

~

Courteney Stuart is the Hook's senior editor.

#

 


Former Charlottesville Fire Chief and current city councilor Julian Taliaferro sits on the newly formed Charlottesville Police Advisory Panel. "I think it's going to offer the opportunity for the people on this board to voice their opinion to the chief of police," says Taliaferro, "and I think he'll listen to it."
FILE PHOTO

 

 


In 2006, Charlottesville City Council erected bold yellow signs in the middle of downtown crosswalks as a reminder to drivers that they are legally required to yield to pedestrians in crosswalks. Enforcement against errant drivers, however, hasn't measured up to CPD charges against pedestrians.
FILE PHOTO BY HAWES SPENCER

 

 


A year after the crosswalk incidents, Charlottesville Police Chief Tim Longo stands by his officers. He has never revealed whether any officers faced disciplinary action for their handling of the incidents, calling such a revelation "inappropriate."
FILE PHOTO BY TOM DALY

 

 


"They treated me like a dog," says Gerry Mitchell, who filed intent to sue with both the city and the county but has not filed actual suit relating to last year's incident in a West Main Street crosswalk in which he was struck by an Albemarle police cruiser and then ticketed by Charlottesville police.
PHOTO BY WILL WALKER

 

 


Using some of the $700,000 allotted for pedestrian improvements in certain downtown areas, City Council installed improved crosswalk signs-- including a "countdown" for pedestrians-- at various intersections.
PHOTO BY COURTENEY STUART

 

 


The dashcam video shot from the front of the Albemarle County Police Cruiser that struck Gerry Mitchell on November 5, 2007, shows Mitchell being struck, then tumbling from his chair into the road. The video also shows witness Ben Gathright and Officer Gregory C. Davis lifting Mitchell from the road and placing him back in his chair.
ALBEMARLE POLICE VIDEO

 

 

#

                     

As a friend of Gerry's living in California, I am surprised and saddened not only by what he's still going through, but the lack of responsibility the police department still maintains for his injuries and the way he was treated. I had hoped to move back to Charlottesville someday, but am wondering now if I want to live in a town thattreats their citizens this way and hold no one accountable.

posted by Ruth Richards at 12/3/2008 11:45:58 PM

I mentioned it the other day in the UVa stadium subject, and I will mention it again. Until people start suing over misconducts and wrongful actions against them by persons of authority, the misconducts and wrongful actions will continue. By not suing, Michell, Austin and Silva certainly aren't doing the citizens of this city and county any type of favor.

And Ruth, trust me, you have no idea what a small handful of officers in both the local city police department and the local county police department are capable of. Back in 2005 my life was physically endangered by a veteran officer of the Charlottesville Police Department who sent two Rambo rookies to visit me while he was orchestrating a false arrest. There was no excuse for it whatsoever. It's almost as if they were trying to find a reason to gun me down on my own property. My inquiry as to why things were done in the manner in which they were went unanswered by anybody associated with any branch of city government. But of course this might be because the veteran officer has been sued for $4 million dollars. It now appears as if it will be 2010 before we can even get this lawsuit in front of a jury and expose the many truths about what took place. Two other Alexandria, Virginia cops go to trial in July of 2009 first.

In 1997, I watched an entire chain of command in a local police department commit perjury in a courtroom. Even the judge acknowledged he felt they all had committed perjury in his courtroom. In the same year, another judge called a small group of cops liars to their face while still on record in open court. I have the transcript laying right here on my desk. The judge's exact words were that he had never seen testimony from two groups of cops so "diametrially opposed" to each other. In other words, he was calling one group of cops the liars that they were. The local newspaper and TV stations present at the tiral didn't report the judge's comments to the public though. They usually don't want to bite the hand that feeds them daily press releases I guess.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/4/2008 10:00:38 AM

Sorry, was typing fast. Meant to say "diametrically opposed" above. The C key ran away, hadn't had his morning coffee yet most likely!

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/4/2008 10:04:40 AM

THe police department needs TRANSPARANCY. Perhpas one way to do it would be for some former resident who is out of reach to flood them with freedom of information acts and publish their dirty laundry on a web site.

Chief Longo is a decent human being but if I were running the show and I sent the info out that there were no witnesses etc HEADS WOULD HAVE ROLLED and everyone would have known why.The only reason not to discuss personell matters is when they have done wrong. I guarantee he would have shared them if the officer got a call from Obama congratulationg him for something positive.

posted by Barney Fife at 12/4/2008 12:38:10 PM

Barney, the police department needs transparency?

Yeah, OK, good luck with that thought.

You, the citizens and the media will know only what the Police Department wants you to know. Nothing more, nothing less. Unless of course an internal leak takes place once in a while.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/4/2008 1:58:44 PM

The wheelchair story again. Wow! I thought it had been a while since the liberal hook slammed law enforcement. It must be a really slow news cycle. This is like watching a sequel at the movies. Only the unoriginal go back to the well this many times.

posted by OG Armchair Quarterback at 12/4/2008 2:09:54 PM

Police officers that hit someone with their cruiser should get a pedestrian silhouette 'kill' sticker added to their cruiser's rocker panel. Maybe a lighter gray one for a near miss that results in a fracas.

posted by Magilla at 12/4/2008 2:14:37 PM

I'll be the realist that says it. I'm sure Mr. Mitchell's kidney failure was caused by the wreck and not by AIDS that has ravaged his body for years. Mr. Mitchell these bleeding heart liberal law enforcement haters do you no justice sir. They just jump on the popular bandwagon. They will be the first people to be begging for the police to save them if something happened.

posted by OG Armchair Quarter at 12/4/2008 2:25:00 PM

OG Armchair Quarter, the vast majority of cases where a citizen needs help real quick are over and done with before a 911 dispatch even goes out to a patrol unit. All the cops basically do is respond and clean up the scene and file a report away on the computer system.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/4/2008 2:39:02 PM

Sick,

Not all police officers are ROD's like you used to be. Don't generalize police by describing how you used to do things in Greene. Oh R.O.D. stands for Retired On Duty if you were wondering.

posted by OG Armchair Quarterbcak at 12/4/2008 7:21:05 PM

OG Armchair Quarterback, the same is true in Greene County. A good fight, domestic assault, robbery, rape or murder is over and done with before the call is even dispatched. The deputies respond to clean up the mess and file a report. These victims are the same people you accuse of condemning the police while at the same time calling the police when they need help. The victims call the police because this is what they are taught to do in a criminal matter. They don't call the police to save them. Why do you have such a hard time understanding this?

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/4/2008 7:45:45 PM

This was old news dredged up because the Hook tries to make news and not report it. It is called being lazy and avoiding journalistic principals.

posted by Does it Matter at 12/4/2008 9:22:01 PM

Some of you whine too much. Go back and read the article again. It's not old news, let me give you a few clues of what to look for....

1- "A year after Gerry Mitchell, what have Charlottesville police learned?"

2- "A year after the crosswalk incident, Gerry Mitchell says the effects of his injuries linger."

3- "One year later, in the wake of those incidents, the city is spending $700,000 on pedestrian safety improvements..."

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/4/2008 9:31:59 PM

Is there anyone who uses a wheelchair on this advisory committee? Has the Independence Resource Center been asked for input by Chief Longo on accessibility and sidewalk improvements for people with disabilities in C'ville? You know, this is also a disabiity rights issue not just a police accountability issue. http://hymes.wordpress.com

posted by Alison Hymes at 12/5/2008 12:14:51 AM

Alison,

I agree that having a person who uses a wheelchair on the committee would have helped the other members of the committee understand what they face when getting around Charlottesville.

Here though, are a few things about the committe you may not be aware of. Jim Herndon, who has a mobility impairment and works in the Department of Neighborhood Services participated on the committee. He is also the ADA coordinator for the city. The Independence Resource Center was represented on the committee though not by someone with a mobility impairment. Mobility issues were discussed and included in the recommendations.

Concerns about access for the disabled should be directed to Public Works and Neighborhood Development, not the police. If you know of problems you should take them to the people who are responsible for the infrastructure and get them fixed. Steve Lawson of Public Works and Jim Herndon of Neighborhood Development will both help correct problems. Speaking to them can be very effective. My wife and I have both pointed out problems of access for people with disabilities and the city fixed those problems. People who don't live with a disabiltiy are often unaware of the challenges that others face. It's important to speak up and help them learn.

I appreciate your concern and I encourage you to get to know the people who are responsible for the physical infrastructure, like curb ramps, traffic signals and crosswalks.

Cordially,

Kevin Cox

posted by Kevin Cox at 12/5/2008 7:34:18 AM

Geez Ms Stuart, do you think it may be a relevant fact to report somewhere in your editorial that Jerry Mitchell was crossing the intercetion against a "do not cross" traffic signal which was clearly documented on the police video tape, oh and that the Police Officer had a green light. I know they are really small details and don't really fit into your overall theme but aren't reporters supposed to report all the facts and let the citizens take it from there? I seem to be detecting a faint bias on your part against the police, omitting facts to strenghthen your position is cowardly jurnalism.

posted by No pinheads at 12/5/2008 8:52:33 AM

Sure it would have been relevant to point out all the circumstances of the accident. The driver of the turning police car did have a green light and the walk signal had not been activated. It would also be relevant to point out that it wouldn't have mattered if the walk signal had been activated. Gerry Mitchell waited and then crossed at the time in the cycle when he should have and that was also when the police officer had a green light to turn. He should have seen Gerry and stopped. Instead he drove into him, knocked him out of his chair and then dragged him back into his wheelchair. Activation of the walk light would not have changed anything. Because the officer was not paying attention he didn't see Gerry Mitchell and he wouldn't have seen the walk light either. The officer's inattention caused the accident. If Gerry was charged the officer should also have been charged.

Cordially,

Kevin Cox

posted by Kevin Cox at 12/5/2008 9:20:00 AM

Pinhead, I don't care if Jerry Mitchell was crossing against 8 Don't Walk signs measuing 80 feet x 200 feet, you don't run over a man in a wheelchair with a 4,500 pound full sized police car. Anybody who can't see a man in a wheelchair in a crosswalk has NO business driving a car, much less driving a police car.

Had it been a city police car in his own jurisdiction, I now wonder if the cop would have lost his temper, jumped out, handcuffed Michell, violently knocked the closest female to the ground, and taken Mitchell to jail. Like in the Austin and Silva cases.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/5/2008 9:49:02 AM

Kevin, your rely brings up another point of interest. When the pedestrian has an activated crosswalk signal, why can the city not give all directions of vehicular traffic a red light at the same time?

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/5/2008 9:52:39 AM

Mr. Cox and Sick,

No offense but you're both blind by your personal bias. Sick is anti-police so we can all see where he is coming from because he is a disgraced ex police officer. Mr. Cox you are a pedestrian activist. Your views will always go in favor of the pedestrian no matter what. You've both demonstrated these beliefs time and time again. Nobody is surprised or influenced by your views.

posted by OG Armchair Quarterback at 12/5/2008 10:03:42 AM

You see once again sir, it's all in how you spin it. The Officer assisted Mr. Mitchell back into his chair following the accident as opposed to letting him lay in the middle of the road, your description makes it sound like that act was ill intended or somehow malodorous. You state that inattention on the part of the driver caused the accident, that's an opinion Sir; and while stating your opinion is perfectly acceptable in this forum, journalism requires a higher standard. The fact is that inattention on the part of the driver may well have contributed to the unfortunate accident just as disregarding a traffic signal on Mr. Mitchell's part may have contributed to the accident. All I'm saying is if you are reporting a story present the facts fairly and let the readers form their own opinion. Left wing reporters seem to have a problem doing that, this article is so biased it's ridiculous.

posted by No pinheads at 12/5/2008 10:10:19 AM

Disgraced ex police officer? Keep dreaming, Sherlock Holmes.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/5/2008 10:36:06 AM

Yes Pinhead, the officer most certainly did assist Mr. Mitchell in getting back into his wheelchair. And this was WRONG too. You never move an injured person unless it's a matter of life and death to not move them. You wait for the rescue personnel who has the proper training and equipment to safely move the person.

Grabbing Mr. Mitchell and tossing him back into his wheelchair did more damage in case you forgot.

You're wasting our time, Pinhead.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/5/2008 10:41:32 AM

What would I have done in this case? I would have pulled my patrol car into such a position so as to block the eastbound traffic on Main Street, which of course would have sheilded Mitchell from the oncoming eastbound traffic. I would have turned "My Humps" off on the radio, there were more important issues to deal with than listening to sleezy music. I would have insisted that Mitchell remain on the ground and be as still as possible until the rescue personnel arrived. Under no circumstances would I have run up to a large man like Mitchell, grabbed his arms, and tried to put him back into his wheelchair. He could have had broken legs or arms when I ran up to grab him. He could have had a number of other injuries that needed evaluating before you grab him up like a ragdoll.

Any traffic traveling eastbound would then have to take a left onto 4th Street NW.

IMHO, the above is why you will see Mitchell's case settled. Strike one - a police car hitting Mitchell in the first place. Strike two - immediately grabbing an injured person resulting in more injuries. Strike three - an official police release claiming there were no witnesses, when we all knew this was far removed from the truth.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/5/2008 11:00:36 AM

Your probably right Sick, your lefties don't want to hear anyone's opinon but your own, guess thats why you congegate on the blog pages of the Hook. Lots of sharp toungues and dull minds.

posted by No pinheads at 12/5/2008 11:04:35 AM

I share my wisdom and knowledge across the entire Internet.

I trust that you now understand the importance of not moving an injured person unless you absolutely have to?

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/5/2008 11:31:05 AM

Sorry Sick but no, it depends on the severity of the accident and what the accident victim says as to their condition, no rule applies to every situation. You can spin any topic to suit your agenda. I'm out. Have a nice life everyone.

posted by No pinheads at 12/5/2008 12:25:27 PM

Bye.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/5/2008 5:13:21 PM

No sick worked for Greene County. Sick would have contacted the State Police then act like he had saved the world.

posted by OG Armchair Quarterback at 12/6/2008 10:20:41 AM

Wrong again, Sherlock Holmes.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/6/2008 12:20:31 PM

I challenge Mr. Longo to tool around the city in a wheelchair for a day. Let the hook follow along to share his experiences with the rest of us.

posted by the dude at 12/6/2008 7:41:30 PM

The issue here is not the accident. It could have been aby one of us driving and anybody that thinks they are somehow above making a mistake like that is an idiot. Life happens.

The only real issue here is how it was handled after the accident and heads should have rolled. Chief Longo should ahve called eeveryone involved in the decision to issue the ticket and not take witness statements etc., and doled out disipline and an imediate apology to Mr. Mitchell. Anyone with common snese knows that public relations is over 50% of any police deparments job.

When they learn to stop circling the wagons the bad cops will look so bad by comparison that they will be weeded out. The cop that hit him is not a bad guy. The only bad guys here are the people that conspired to make it go away and Chief Longo for not firing them for the coverup.

posted by common sense at 12/8/2008 10:51:01 AM

Common Sense, your comment hits the nail right on the head. You're right, it could have happened to any of us. I know quite a few good cops and understand how incredibly tough and stressful their jobs can be.

I've always been a supporter of Longo, his leadership style, and his vision for the department. But his actions in these two cases were very misguided and have left me disappointed. This should have been a valuable learning experience for EVERYONE involved, but became a wasted opportunity when Longo made some very hurtful statements. By publicly misstating the truth about witnesses etc, he ended up pitting his department against the citizens of Charlottesville.

When a pregnant woman and a man in a wheelchair suffer abuse at the hands of authority figures (whether the abuse is intentional or accidental), that's the time to be humble. Show that you too are a vulnerable human being, and you might be surprised at understanding everyone can be. Keep the dialog open, allow the ideas to flow, and everyone involved benefits even though the root cause might have been tragic. Or you can circle the wagons and watch the insults, paranoia, and negativity levels rise rapidly on both sides.

C'mon Tim, many of us know you to be a truly great guy and a good chief. Please reconsider your part in this. It's not too late for healing on all sides. Knowledge is power, and we'll all be better for it. What can we do to stat bringing everyone together?

posted by It's Not Too Late at 12/8/2008 11:30:25 AM

Whether this type of incident could happen to anybody or not is a subject wide open to a great debate. When you go into DMV they test your peripheral vision. If your peripheral vision is not good enough to see a big man in a wheelchair just a few feet to your left, I'm not sure you have a right to be licensed and driving on the public highways. Especially when you are actually turning into what you should have seen with your peripheral vision in the first place.

I suspect if this had been an ordinary citizen who struck Mitchell, they would have been sent back into DMV to be retested. If this same officer is involved in a similar type event in the future, Albemarle County had better hope they sent the officer in for some type of peripheral vision testing somehow somewhere.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/8/2008 12:55:21 PM

Ahh, Sick of the local rambos, always second guessing the cops.

Sicko says: "What would I have done in this case? I would have pulled my patrol car into such a position so as to block the eastbound traffic on Main Street, which of course would have sheilded Mitchell from the oncoming eastbound traffic. I would have turned "My Humps" off on the radio,"

Sick, you aren't the cops. Have you ever been a real cop? Have you ever patrolled a street, highway, etc. and answered calls like our police do? Handled life and death situations? I doubt it.

This officer made a mistake, and as an ordinary citizen - even I can see that. Why crucify him? So he picked the guy up and put him back into his chair. That was probably his first reaction to get this man off the pavement and out of further harm. Hey, I can respect his instinct. Oh, and he was listening to "My Humps" -- so freakin' what?? WTF does that have to do with anything?? If he was listening to something you approved of sick, would it make you feel better? Why don't you post your favorite songs and hopefully the officer will see this and start listening. I bet the number one song on your list that is in your car right now is "Bad Boys - Bad Boys"

Please make sure when you respond that you post the link to the bad cop website so you can remind us where you stand :)

posted by Second guessing at 12/8/2008 1:14:32 PM

SOTLR - we don't know if lack of peripheral vision caused this accident. It could have been driver inattention, or any of a number of other causes. Doesn't excuse it, but to be fair, we have to acknowledge that this happens sometimes.

If ordinary citizens are ticketed for causing this sort of accident, and cops aren't, then that is a serious issue that needs to be dealt with. However, if the victim is ticketed in order to provide an excuse for an officer to NOT be ticketed, then that's doubly worse. It seems likely that that's what happened here. This is precisely why transparency is so essential in this case.

posted by It's Not Too Late at 12/8/2008 1:21:58 PM

The key here is in the first paragraph: "a pair of incidents..." I said it then and will repeat: only in a lib town like Cville could we have time to appoint an advocacy panel for "pedestrians" in an overreaction to a couple of incidents. Mr. Mitchell aside, how many twits do we see in Cville blocking the street from my Suburban getting through as they saunter across with their iPods and Starbucks? Yes, I agree we need more transparency in the PD...all departments do. Now, if our fine officer who was on wheelchair-hunting detail was listening to music, trying to monitor his police radio and, ostensibly, watching what he was doing, how does that conflict with the department's general orders? This is not a crisis in pedestrian management; it is common sense. Copper, pay attention to driving. Peds, remember, as you daydream about a world where the workers control the means of production, that even a grant from Bama Works won't save you from the idiot in the car barreling towards you.

Oh, and to the potty-mouthed gent who yelled at Officer Flaherty: Watch your mouth, sir. Don't you know that the baby in your girly-girl's womb is shaped by what it can hear outside the body? Cops are notoriously short-tempered when called names in public, regardless of the reason. And--in all seriousness--thanks for your service to the USA. We all know that if it weren't for folks like you, getting pregnant before marriage would be a punishable offense!

posted by Never Been to a Game at 12/8/2008 1:25:21 PM

Well said!

posted by Second guessing at 12/8/2008 1:50:38 PM

never been to a game... Officer Flaherty screwed up. He lost his temper in front a half dozen people. He is lucky that he didn't get punched in the face for his behavior. If had been under my command he would have been forced to make a public apology or resign. I will defend any police officer who makes a mistake as they are there to protect me. I will not however stand by and defend a grown man who cannot handle being called a name... especially when he was the instigator in the situation.

Your BS comments about cussing in front of an unborn child are pale in comparison to the adrenaline rush coursing through the mothers body as a direct result of almost being run over by a cop not following the rules (safety first)

This paper should ask chief Longo to sit down and answer these very questions as to why he did not stand up for the citizens in these incidents. If nothing else to clear the air about whether he actually thinks he did right.. then and only then when we have it straight from the horses mouth can we really know who we are counting on to protect us...from the criminals and the rogue cops.

posted by common sense at 12/8/2008 2:02:47 PM

Never Been-- would you care to comment on Flaherty's own potty mouth? Or, as I now suspect, do you not actually know him...? Didn't think so...

Personally, I like the guy, but HE SCREWED UP. Your blaming two people whose only crime was legally walking in a crosswalk is beyond ridiculous. Any cop that reacts that vehemently to someone saying "Watch the **** where you're going!" after they're almost run over, either needs additional training, or an entirely new line of work. Not everybody is cut out to be a cop, and that's okay. Needless to say, everybody has a really bad day sometimes, but a real man owns up to that and apologizes when his actions call for it.

posted by It's Not Too Late at 12/8/2008 2:23:12 PM

quote: "Sick, you aren't the cops. Have you ever been a real cop? Have you ever patrolled a street, highway, etc. and answered calls like our police do? Handled life and death situations? I doubt it."

Yes, I have.

And in 30 years of driving Sheriff's Office vehicles (Albemarle County, City of Charlottesville, and Greene County), I have never struck any person or other vehicles. Especially a person in a wheelchair in a crosswalk. Well, except one time of course. I intentionally knocked a bicycle over with my front bumper and grabbed the escaped prisoner that was riding this bicycle. Even this is not acceptale nowadays if you pay attention to what is going on in South Carolina right now, troopers intentioanlly running over people and laughing about it and making racist jokes about it - on video.

quote: "Officer Flaherty screwed up. He lost his temper in front a half dozen people. He is lucky that he didn't get punched in the face for his behavior."

Based on his arrests of the couple he almost ran over, and based on witness statements, I agree with you 100%. Next time he loses his temper and grabs somebody, there's a chance he might have to shoot and kill them if they fight back.

Furthermore, hiting a cop has been upgraded to a felony in Virginia now... with mandatory jail time. Because of this, it's best to fight back in the form of a lawsuit.

quote: "So he picked the guy up and put him back into his chair. That was probably his first reaction to get this man off the pavement and out of further harm."

So, you claim or admit his first reaction overruled his training? This is not a good thing. Cops are trained not to move injured persons unless it is absolutely necessary to prevent further injury or death. Mitchell hit the pavement face first. He did not have to be moved. Cops are trained to wait for rescue squad personnel who have the proper equipment to treat and move them without inflicting further harm. It's not rocket science.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/8/2008 5:05:47 PM

quote: "Any cop that reacts that vehemently to someone saying "Watch the **** where you're going!" after they're almost run over, either needs additional training, or an entirely new line of work."

Why? The taxpayers can pay the damages for whatever he does in the future. The only thing that breaks a cop of bad habits is if a jury awards punitive damages, and the cop has to pay those punitive damages himself/herself. It wasn't too long ago a Rambo Rookie cop arrested a fire captain in Hazlewood, Missouri for blocking a lane of travel with the fire engine. The cop wanted it moved. The fire captain said NO! The fire captain was awarded puntive damages for this false arrest, and the officer had to pay them, $18,00.

see video http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=233_1203031330

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/8/2008 5:16:18 PM

Whoops, I meant ------ $18,000.

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/8/2008 5:18:13 PM

If Officer Flaherty had done his job, he would have taken a DNA sample from the young lady and ascertained that she was, indeed, with child. That is supposedly allowed in Charlottesville.

Common sense, I like the parenthetic "safety first" pun in reference to an unwed pregnant woman; that was pretty funny.

How many Charlottesville cops does it take to push a handcuffed perp down the steps? NONE--he fell.

Perhaps one of the rich, bored, bleach-blonde desperate housewives in Charlottesville who take our tax dollars by creating bogus non-profit organizations can begin a new one: COPS--Charlottesville Oppressed Pedestrian Society.

posted by Never Been to a Game at 12/9/2008 8:30:38 AM

I'm not sure why being pregnant really plays a role in any of this. Do you think they really care one way or the other, either before or after she was knocked to the ground?

How many cops does it take to jerk an injured man up off the pavement and plop him back into his wheelchair? One. There were no witnesses helping him. :)

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/9/2008 11:14:55 AM

I wonder what a jury would have thought if Officer flaherty had run over that couple and killed them both since he was barreling through dinnertime pedestrian traffic without his siren or lights on...

The "safety first" comment was about the odds of killing a pedestrian trying to stop a domestic dispute that 3 other cops were already on the way to.

The department screwed this PR up and deserve the wrath... regardless of whether the police officer got his feelings hurt by a potty mouth.

It is like a restaurant sometimes comps a drink to keep a customer who may be in the wrong from ruining his reputation.

Why is this so hard for Chief Longo to grasp?

posted by common sense at 12/9/2008 11:25:41 AM

Common Sense, while not on a local basis by any means, I have seen a police chief serve up a cop to the public on a silver platter. Sure, the police chief had more than just cause and proceeded to do the correct thing. The public applauded the chief's decision. But the aftermath sure killed the police chief though. The other cops on the force took a vote of "no confidence" on the police chief and presented it to the governing body. The governing body then fired the chief and started looking for a replacement.

So, you have to ask yourself - who's really in charge at a police department? The chief, the officers or the governing body? Do chiefs fear a vote of no confidence? How can a governing body ignore a vote of no confidence in a police chief by the men who work under him? Talk about a can of worms....

posted by Sick Of The Local Rambos at 12/9/2008 12:25:25 PM

I noticed something interesting. SOTLR made it clear that there is no accountability in CPD and yet, there are pro-CPD folks who continued to attack SOTLR for telling the truth.

As Deaf individual who is a fan of Virginia Cavaliers and has several Deaf friends living in C'ville, they told me some alarming stories about CPD officers being condescending towards Deaf people in general. CPD often dismiss them of their statements in different matters. And yes, a couple of friends told me that CPD officers has the "reputation" of driving wild in C'ville.

For some reasons I never bother to believe these stories by my friends until I read this today. Suddenly, this simply fits what my Deaf friends claimed all along.

Maybe Chief Longo needs to be terminated.

R-

posted by The One and Only Ridor at 12/9/2008 11:47:24 PM

We have CIT training in Charlottesville that trains Charlottesville, Albemarle and UVA police in more effective ways to deal with people with psychiatric disabilities, maybe we need a program to train police on more effective and sensitive ways to deal with all people with disabilities they come across in their duties. http://hymes.wordpress.com

posted by Alison Hymes at 12/10/2008 11:13:57 PM

OMG...What do these people want? Do the they want the officer(s) do? Get down on their knees and give them a BJ?

Seriously. Get over it.

If you think you can do better job than these guys...by all means, have it...

Try working weekends, holidays, missing your kids milestones etc, all the while working for peanuts, because idiots like yourself think that a traffic light study and a pedestrian study of $700,000 are worth it...

You are the first to job on the anti police band wagon...I bet NONE of you have ever made a mistake in your job...or in your life...Right???

I hope that you never have to call on the police for help...

posted by Whiskey Tango Foxtrot at 12/22/2008 9:14:54 PM

Your Name:
Your Email (optional):
Comment:
Word Count:
0
500 word limit
Image Verification:
Please type the letters above:
*  People say the darndest things, but if they use language stronger than "darn," if they use ethnically or racially disparaging language, or start comparing people to Hitler, they may find that we've deleted the comment. Ditto for most unverified information, potentially libelous statements, and anything off the topic.



© 2002-2008 Better Publications LLC - The Hook - 100 Second Street NW - Charlottesville, VA 22902 - 434-295-8700 (fax: 434-295-8097) :Login: