Hook Logo
Search
January 2008
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

going to movie listings...

Location:


Cuisine:


Price Range:


Please upgrade your Flash Player
Hook Webcam downtown charlottesville Click for Charlottesville, Virginia Forecast

MOVIE REVIEW- Muggles beware: Has Harry's magic worn off?

published July 12, 2007

Special to THE HOOK

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is for hardcore fans only. Not the ones who have blown up nude stills of Daniel Radcliffe in Equus to poster size– well, maybe them too– but those who have followed the series from the beginning, probably on page as well as screen.

With the septet well past the halfway mark, gone are the days when a casual moviegoer could go in cold and enjoy a Harry Potter film as a self-contained entity. There's too much backstory to recap– instead there are casual references to past characters and incidents to delight the cognoscenti– and the inconclusive ending is merely a stop sign on the way to the final destination.

With less time for fun, the shortest Potter movie so far gets down to business quickly with Harry defending himself and cousin Dudley Dursley (Harry Melling) against Dementors, leading to an order for his expulsion from Hogwarts for the use of "underage sorcery" outside of school.

The intercession of headmaster Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) keeps Harry in school for the fifth year, but something is definitely up. The Ministry of Magic is publicly refuting Harry's claim that Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) is back and up to no good. To keep a lid on things, they install Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton) as the teacher of Defense against Dark Arts. In the pinkest wardrobe since Legally Blonde, she's the smiling face of malevolent bureaucracy, most frightening when she laughs, endangering her students by forbidding them to use magic in class.

It's established early on that there's a psychic link between Harry and Voldemort, and that in the end only one of them can survive. Unfortunately "the end" means the end of the series, so their battle at the end of this film is virtually meaningless, and means the sixth film (also to be directed by Phoenix director David Yates, heretofore known only for British television work) will be another extended trailer for the seventh, even though readers will know the outcome in a few days.

Harry rebels against Umbridge and forms "Dumbledore's Army," giving his fellow students the defense training their teacher, with Orwellian logic, denies them. (The army is significantly smaller when it comes time to fight than when they're training.) Meanwhile Umbridge's power at the school grows exponentially, until she replaces Dumbledore.

Compared to most of us, Harry has had a pass through adolescence, a kind of "Get Out of Puberty Free" card. The one thing computer-generated effects can't make believable is that a boy could age from 11 to 16 with more concern about saving the world than zits and a constant erection. ("Whip your wand out" could be a new catchphrase emerging from Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.) Harry gets his first kiss, not from Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) but Cho Chang (Katie Leung), who is then taken out of the action before it can lead to anything.

For better (Staunton as Umbridge, Evanna Lynch as Luna Lovegood) or worse (Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange, flamboyant cousin of Sirius Black (Gary Oldman), Harry's godfather), new characters are thrown into the mix. A few have disappeared too, but most of the oldies are back– in flashbacks or dreams if they're not still alive– with few having time to make an impression. Emma Thompson, Richard Griffiths, Fiona Shaw, Maggie Smith, Brendan Gleeson, Warwick Davis, David Thewlis and Julie Walters are among those with a scene or two each. Rupert Grint is around more as Ron Weasley but has little to do. 

There are new creatures too, including the lovely flying Thestrals and Hagrid's (Robbie Coltrane) gigantic half-brother, Grawp, who looks like Shrek only not as real.

There's no Quidditch match this time, but that's about the only thing they're willing to admit they've run into the ground. Potterheads will drool over every frame; but while my resistance may put me in the critical minority, I doubt I'll be the only one for whom the magic has worn off. 

#

                     

THE SERIES OF HARRY POTTER MOVIES HAS AN EPIC IMPACT ON THE WORLD OF MOVIES, YET THIS ONE COULD HAVE BEEN MUCH BETTER...NO ALOT OF BETTER. THIS MOVIE HAPPENS TO BE THE WORST OF ALL THE HARRY POTTER MOVIE SERIES, AS MOST BOOKS TURN HOLLYWOOD, INFORMATION IS LOST FORGETTEN OR JUST NOT MENTION BUT THIS ONE HAD THAT PLUS THE FACT THAT THROUGHOUT THE MOVIE YOU ONLY SAW THE THREE MOST IMPORTANT CHARACTERS.I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE THAN HERMIONE SMARTNESS, RON'S LOST MIND AND HARRY POTTER DECLARINGS OF BRAVERY. THIS MOVIE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CALL HARRY POTTER AND THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX BUT HARRY POTTER AND THE ORDER OF THE BIG HEAD SYNDROME OF ACTORS . THE EFFECT WHERE ACTORS IN MOVIES HAVE TO MANYCAMERA TIME AND NOT ENOUGH ACTION OR THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW CHARACTERS AND OLD CHARACTERS. EXAMPLE LUNA LOVEGOOD WERID GIRL AND NEW HAS ONLY THESE PARTS: GIVE INFORMATION TO HELP HARRY POTTER, EXPLAIN HOW WERID SHE IS AND HELP HARRY POTTER TO DEFEAT LORD VOLDEMONT THEN EXITS PICTURE. CHO CHANG KISSES HARRY POTTER, BETRAY HARRY POTTER DISPOSED OF ANY CLUE OF WHAT HAPPEN TO HER AFTERWARDS. NOT MUCH TO BE SAID ABOUT HOW POOR THE ACTING WAS IT GOT TO THE POINT WHERE MY DOG WOULD HAVE DONE BETTER AND IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW DOGS DON'T SPEAK ENGLISH, SOIT'S THAT BAD. ACTORS AND ACTRESSES SEEM AS THOUGH THEY HAD NO TIME TO STUDY THE SCRIPT AND OH LETS SAY ACT TO MAKE WHATS GOING ON BELIEVABLE. NO TALENT WHATS SO EVER. I WASTED 12 DOLLARS FOR THE SO CALLED MOVIE OF THE YEAR, I'M STILL LOOKING FOR THE REST. THE FIRST TWENTY MINS WAS BORING WASTE OF TIME, NO ACTUAL ACTING. LOTS OF DIALOGUE THROUGH THE MOVIE UNTIL THE LAST 20 MINS OF ACTION. THEN YOU HAVE 5 MORE MINS OF MORE DIALOGUE WITH NO ACTING. THING ABOUT DIRECTING SERIES OF MOVIES YOU MUST NOTE THAT THE ONE AFTER THE LAST MOVIE SHOULD BE BETTER THEN THE OTHERS. TO KEEP ME WANTING MORE. THIS ONE WAS THE WORST AND PLEASE PLEASE GIVE OTHER PEOPLE CAMERA TIME HARRY POTTER'S WORDS OF COURAGE ISN'T THAT IMPORTANT. I GUESS THATS THE REASON WHY THE DIRECTOR OF THIS MOVIE HAS THE FAVOR OF HARRY POTTER TO DIRECT THE NEXT ONE BECAUSE HE GOT THE MOST CAMERA TIME WHICH IS NO DOUBT SPOOKY BECAUSE HARRY POTTER LOOKS LIKE A 30 YEAR OLD NERD. SORRY BAD HABIT OF CRITICIZING BAD MOVIES WITH BAD ACTING. THIS MOVIE ON ASCALE OF 1 TO 10, 10 BEING THE BEST IT GOT AND 2 FROM ME. HOPEFULLY THE NEXT MOVIE WILL BE BETTER AND LORD VOLDEMONT WILL ACTUALLY KICKS SOME ASS NEXT TIME.

THIS WAS NEKO'S MOVIE REVIEW JOIN ME FOR THE NEXT BAD MOVIE.

posted by neko at 7/13/2007 10:05:14 PM

The article's author wrote: "The one thing computer-generated effects can't make believable is that a boy could age from 11 to 16 with more concern about saving the world than zits and a constant erection."

You really have to blame that on the author. The film is simply trying to stay faithful to the novels.

posted by Bill Wells at 7/14/2007 11:47:36 PM
Your Name:
Your Email (optional):
Comment:
Image Verification:
Please type the letters above:
  *  We want vibrant debate, so please comment on this story. People say the darndest things, but if they use language stronger than "darn," if they use ethnically or racially disparaging language, or start comparing people to Hitler, they may find that we've deleted the comment without warning. A few more rules: no libel, no slander, and no lying. And please stay on the topic.



100% 100% 100% Visit this Site
100%
© 2002-2008 Better Publications LLC - The Hook - 100 Second Street NW - Charlottesville, VA 22902 - 434-295-8700 (fax: 434-295-8097)