STROM SENTENCING POINTS UP ACCOUNTABILITY

Richard Barrett

The sentencing of Kevin Strom to two years for child-pornography

points up the issue of accountability. At his sentencing, Strom asked for

"one minute for every month already spent in jail." However, he should

have received one year for every pornographic picture he possessed. He

admitted to having downloaded one-hundred-thousand to his computer,

but excused it on the grounds that only a fraction depicted sex with kiddies.

"Accountability, however," refers to individual, as well as group, responsibility.

Accomplices are just as culpable as the culprit.

Strom followed the pattern of David Duke in pleading guilty, but, then,

claiming that he was not guilty. Duke, who had defrauded his contributors,

compounded by mail-fraud and tax-evasion, pleaded guilty, but, upon

arrival at the "big house," claimed that he really had not been guilty, at all,

despite seizure of his records, detailing his corruption and cover-up.

Strom did not wait so long. He told the judge that he was not guilty and

had been framed, but the judge noted that, since Strom had pleaded guilty

and not withdrawn his plea, the court was bound to treat him as guilty.

The telling point was the backing, which both Duke and Strom received.

Upon Duke's release from prison, Strom journeyed to New Orleans

to sign a document, compiled by Duke, pledging never to criticize Duke

or anyone else imprisoned for any sort of crimes. It was a bizarre but

revealing document, the import of which echoed the old adage that "the

king can do no wrong" by claiming that "anyone 'white' can do no wrong."

One thing lacking in both Strom and Duke was contrition. There never

was any "I am sorry," "I apologize" or "Please forgive me."

A website, supporting both Strom and Duke, immediately criticized those

who backed the convictions, calling them "FBI-informants," "bad-mouthers,"

"liars," "Jews," "weird" and "homosexuals." It was even asserted that

Nationalists who "attacked" Strom and Duke were "hurting the movement."

During prosecution, it had been revealed that Duke had spent his loot for

gambling and whore-mongering and Strom had been stalking a ten-year-old

girl. For calling both Duke and Strom out, this writer was called "a joke"

and "non-white" by the convicts' partisans.

Strom and Duke shared one other deviant trait. They both had gleefully

heaped calumny upon those who leveled criticism at their criminality.

Strom published an appeal over his now-defunct website insisting that

this writer be assassinated. He was joined by April Gaede, the mother

of the teenage singing-duo, who Strom had managed and whose heads

Strom had pasted onto pornographic images. Duke, also, had launched a

tirade, by way of surrogates, against his critics, terming them "skunks,"

who "deserve not to draw another breath on this earth."

Duke has moved to a foreign country, where he received a mail-order-style

"doctor's degree." He refers to himself as "Doctor Duke" in Internet

posts. His once well-oiled political-machine has collapsed. His Duke

Campaign, NAAWP and "No Fear" organizations, which had been taken

up by disciples, are defunct. Strom, who had aspired to perpetuate the late

William L. Pierce, whose book had been the blueprint for the Oklahoma-City

bombing, has been banned from the Internet. He has been allowed access

to his retarded son, during his fifteen-year probation.

http://www.skinheadz.com/news/articles/2008/042701.html

© 2008 Skinheadz

He should serve at least a year for wearing that sweater!... What a dirtball....

This article seems to be making its claims rather carelessly.

For example, the foreign country in question was Russia, and Duke lived there several years ago - but apparently does not do so now.

Why not be specific, and why not be accurate (unless the writer is ignorant of these facts)?

Strom's son is apparently autistic (which is not necessarily the same thing as being "retarded").

So there is some lack of caution here, in applying names to things, and describing people's activities.

... which makes me less inclined to just agree with everything in it.

The authority's frame people as pedophiles all the time, they call it "pedofied" and they do it because they can get away with murder by pedofying someone they want dead.

I am a witness as well as a victim of these tactics and I have them admitting to it on a audio file.

It's the easiest thing in the world for authority's to frame someone as a pedophile.

They can hack your computer and upload you know what on your computer and the next day the sheriff's are kicking down your door and charging you as a pedo, and it's your word against there's.

It's there faverite way to kill people because they die as the bad guy's and the authority's that framed them look like the good guy's.

If someone in authority has it out for you they will give you a criminal record without you ever being charged or going to court.

They will put something like "under investigation for child porn" on your record.

Good luck getting a job now, and a prospective employer will not tell you that's on your record, they simply wont hire you.

If you find out about it and complain to authority they will simply pretend error.

If they want you dead, then they will "investigate" you by going to your neighborhood and go door to door giving your description but not your name claiming there looking for a pedophile in the neighborhood.

They do this KNOWING it will give you a reputation, the kind of reputation that will get you shot.

Sometimes they pedofy people already behind prison walls by simply telling other prisoners behind your back that your a pedophile.

Don't you think the prisoners will kill someone which they believe is a pedophile?

Don't you think the accusation by a prison guard behind your back is good enough for someone in the shower to stab you?

The authority's don't have to formally charge you as a pedophile to frame you as one, the accusation alone is good enough in this country to get you killed and authority's hands are clean.

I already have authority's on an audio file admitting they pedofy people they want dead for the purpose of getting away with murder.

They don't even care if I tell any one about it because when it comes down to it, who's going to arrest them?

No one.

Think about it, how easy it is to turn hundreds or thousands of people against someone with just that acusation.

That's why the authority's privatly call it pedofied.

They will never admit to it because it is premeditated murder and they KNOW it, they KNOW it gets people killed.