Hook Logo
Search

COVER- Big steps: Will Martha Jefferson's leap bring a footbridge?


Published September 18, 2008 in issue 0738 of the Hook
Bookmark and Share


PHOTO BY JEN FARIELLO
Martha Jefferson Hospital is planning to complete its move to a new site on Pantops Mountain in 2012, and bicyclist Randy Salzman is very, very worried.

Armed with a county road survey, the freelance transportation planner believes traffic on nearby Free Bridge, which already carries over 50,000 vehicles a day, is about to become gridlock central. While hospital officials downplay that possibility, Salzman, decked out this day in a bright yellow biking shirt, has a vision for a yellow brick road of sorts-- a road that that would move people, not cars, over the Rivanna River.

Sweat beads dripping from his forehead, former college professor Salzman pauses in Charlottesville's Riverview Park to outline his vision of a bridge that would transform an existing recreational network into a route for city residents living near the river to get not just to the new Martha Jeff, but also to Pantops shops and offices. For the past two years, Salzman has been pushing for a bicycle and pedestrian bridge connecting city and county trails to provide a use beyond recreation.

It all starts with the Rivanna Trail, a network of narrow paths built by the city and the private Rivanna Trails Foundation.

"They're beautiful walkways," says Salzman, "but they're not being used for transportation."

A bridge for bikes and pedestrians might change all that.


The other bridges

Since around 2003, the idea of crossing the Rivanna with a bike/pedestrian bridge has caught the fancy of planners and engineers. But the site that's garnered the most attention-- until now, at least-- is a link between Pen and Darden-Towe Parks. Besides the happy symbolism of uniting city and county, such a bridge might allow many park users to abandon the incongruous practice of climbing into a vehicle to reach a park.

While engineering plans for the park-to-park bridge-- a planned 600-footer--- have been made by the American Society of Civil Engineers and civil engineering students at UVA, according to retired UVA civil engineering professor David Morris, the $3.5 million project has hit a funding roadblock.

"Between the economy and other more pressing projects, this has been on the back-burner," Morris says.

But city trails planner Chris Gensic says the park-to-park bridge-- which could potentially link the parks with the Meadowcreek Parkway trail and connect Route 29 north with Pantops in the future-- is now a top priority, although the uncertainty of highway plans complicates its future.

"The wild card is the proposed Eastern Connector," says Gensic. "Do I move forward on a pedestrian bridge if they're going to build a bigger [car] bridge?"

Another priority, he says, is a McIntire Park bicycle/pedestrian bridge that would cross the railroad tracks in the park. "Essentially it's two different parks right now," says Gensic, noting that the McIntire plan was denied federal transportation enhancement money last year.

 

Not backed with greenbacks

Like the park-to-park bridge, a Pantops-area footbridge could easily cost upwards of $3.5 million, Gensic says, and might even cost more because it requires additional engineering because of its location in the flood plain and the cliffs and creeks surrounding the river.

But Salzman's not finished with big dreams. He thinks it should be constructed to carry transit vehicles like an electric trolley.

"If you're going to build it," he says, "why not build it with as many options as possible?"

Even with the hefty price tags and extra options, Stephen Bach, board member for a group called the Alliance for Community Choice in Transportation (ACCT), says constructing a bicycle and pedestrian bridge could be a wise economic decision.

"Building a bridge like that is going to be less expensive than building another highway or expanding Free Bridge," Bach says. Indeed, for comparison, just the bridge/interchange for the southern end of the planned Meadowcreek Parkway has been estimated at over $30 million, exclusive of land cost.

Funding for alternative transportation might come in part through CHART, the citizen's advisory committee to the area metropolitan planning organization, of which Bach is a member. The organization makes a list of potential projects to receive federal funding every five years and sends it to the advisory board of the Metropolitan Planning Organization, the area's sifter of transportation projects. CHART will finalize its recommendations in the fall of 2009, and although Bach says the first draft has not been written, a Pantops bridge will be considered as the committee looks at the future of transportation.

"What's it going to be like in five years?" asks Bach, noting the high price of gas. "It would make complete sense to look ahead and say we're not going to build for motor vehicles."

But even with verbal support from various community members and officials, the Pantops bridge lacks a different kind of backing.

"It's not a lack of ideas, it's not a lack of support, it's a lack of funding," says Harrison Rue, who recently stepped down as executive director of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission. "We're not gridlocked," he says, "we're fundlocked."

Part of the funding problem is that local governments currently don't have a good way to raise transportation money. "It's up to the General Assembly to develop a stable transportation funding source or pass a law that would develop a local funding source that isn't based on property," says Rue, noting that gas or sales taxes might be possible solutions.


What happened to Enhancement?

One possible source of funding for novel transportation projects could be the federal Enhancement program. Unveiled in 1991 under the first president Bush, Enhancement funds were supposed to break the roads-only focus of federal funding bills by reserving a portion for projects that enhance intermodal connections and foster alternative transportation systems.

What happened, however, is that many of the Enhancement grants (in the form of state-administered reimbursements) were handed to projects like welcome centers, streetscapes, and well-organized museums. Recent awards, for instance, include $150,000 for landscaping at Montpelier and $300,000 to make over the Pleasant Grove manor house in Fluvanna County.

"These funds have been used for recreation, not transportation," says Salzman.

In the late 1990s, Monticello raked in $3.4 million in Enhancement money for its $6.78-million Thomas Jefferson Parkway project, which included a stone-faced bridge, a 175-acre park, a hiking and biking trail along Route 53, and a pedestrian culvert under Route 53.

"There's no transportation value to it at all," says Salzman.

In 2008, the lone local Enhancement grant was $300,000 for the planned $1.1 million visitor center for the Lewis and Clark Exploratory Center on the banks of the Rivanna River. The "transportation" includes interpretive trails and a ferry. Citing the Rivanna River's history as Port Pireus in the 1820s and '30s, Albemarle County trails planner Dan Mahon defends the award by noting that the Lewis and Clark ferry might be a prototype for a ferry system that could temporarily be set up near Pantops until a bridge is built.

Still, Salzman bristles over the fact that Enhancement money has turned into a funding source that "enhances the public's traveling experience" instead of improving non-motorized transportation.

"This money was passed originally to wean us from foreign oil," says Salzman, "but it actually increases our driving. It's totally absurd."

Alternative and public transportation are essential for the nation to wean itself from the dependence on oil, he believes. "My son went to Iraq," he says. "I don't want my grandsons to go."

In addition to foreign policy, Salzman says America's car culture has damaged the health of young people.

"In over 20 years of teaching college," says Salzman, "I've seen my students get fatter and fatter and less willing to walk up the stairs."

Michael Estes, director of VDOT's Local Assistance Division, contends that foot and wheel-friendly projects will be more heavily weighed in the upcoming selection year. Says Estes, "We're encouraging pedestrian and bicycle bridges." 

Salzman thinks it's high time. "There's pressure on VDOT now that might not be there next year," he says.

Applications are due November 1 for funding that will arrive in October of 2009 and require the endorsement of a local MPO-- the Charlottesville-Albemarle MPO in this case. Estes says the average grant, that can range from $15,000 to $1 million, is $350,000. Applying for a research grant this year would allow enough time to complete a study to make sure the bridge would be used, Salzman says, and allow proponents to apply for construction money in subsequent years.

While the bridge is in the city's master plan, it is absent from the county's master plan.

"I'm really supportive of the idea, but unfortunately it's not in our Pantops plan," says the county's Mahon. The Pantops plan, updated every five years, was last revised in March.

Without that endorsement, it doesn't look like Salzman's bridge idea will win an Enhancement grant just yet, and the city's Gensic says he plans to seek Enhancement funds for now-higher-priority city projects like the McIntire Park and Darden Towe-Pen Park bridges.

Still, Gensic optimistically says the Pantops bridge could be built in four years. "We'd like to have it when the hospital opens," he says.

Having the bridge in place before the hospital relocates will increase its use, Salzman says, because people are be more receptive to changing their modes of transportation when they're changing their commutes at the same time.

"If it is built in time for when Martha Jefferson employees have to make a transportation change, the odds go up 20 percent that they will make the change to muscle-fueled transportation," says Salzman.

Gensic says he's exploring potential sites for the bridge, which include routes from the new eco-friendly Riverview Bluffs community, from Riverview Park, and along an I-64/railroad route. Before a site is chosen, Gensic says, surrounding residents and engineers will be consulted to determine the best option.


A bridge too far?

Such a bridge might not need to be built, however-- it might already exist in the far southeastern corner of the state. Just outside Galax in mountainous Grayson County, the historic Route 94-J.P. Carrico Memorial truss bridge crosses the New River. VDOT wants to replace it and is willing to pay someone $267,000-- what the state might have spent on demolition-- to take it away.

"This is the first time we've offered a bridge like this," says VDOT architectural historian Kalli Lucas, noting that the camel-back style of the 913-foot-long structure makes it eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. "That's a rare type in the state of Virginia."

The two-lane bridge, built in 1927 and still considered safe for traffic, according to Lucas, may be ready for removal in the summer of 2012. Gensic has written a letter of interest for the bridge but says the monetary incentive might not offset the moving costs.


Better than the Connector?

The daily traffic count across Free Bridge was 52,000 in 2007, according to county transportation manager Juandiego Wade. A 2003 county traffic study prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates estimated that the hospital's relocation will generate an additional 22,600 trips per day on surrounding roads.

"With these types of numbers, the public will see and feel a difference," Wade says.

But Martha Jefferson officials disagree. Ron Cottrell, the hospital vice president in charge of the move, says the relocation will actually relieve, rather than exacerbate, Free Bridge traffic. He contends that the new site's proximity to I-64, which has far more capacity than any city road, will cause more patients and employees to avoid congested City streets altogether. More employees and patients come from surrounding counties than from the city, Cottrell says, and many already use I-64 to access the current Locust Avenue site.

Nonetheless, Cottrell supports the freelance bicycle/pedestrian bridge idea.

But Kevin Cox doesn't. The local pedestrian activist, although he walks five miles each day to his job at UVA Hospital, considers a multi-million-dollar footbridge a "ludicrous" option.

"The number of people who will walk that far to work at State Farm, Martha Jefferson, or the other businesses at Pantops is very small," says Cox. "Salzman needs to face that reality."

Salzman, however, worries that more traditional approaches to decreasing traffic on Route 250-- i.e. another expensive auto bridge-- will become more popular if alternative means are not addressed now.

According to documents submitted to the Economic Development Authority of Albemarle County (in order to secure the right to issue up to $195 million in tax-free bonds), the new five-story hospital will have 176 beds and a whopping  456,358 square feet of space.

"When the Free Bridge comes to a halt in 2012," says Salzman, "there will be immense political pressure on everyone to build another [car] bridge."

Already, such an effort is under way in the form of the proposed "Eastern Connector," a controversial road whose steering committee recently recommended a pathway bisecting Pen Park with a new four-lane road and connecting Rio Road near the Charlottesville Albemarle Technical Education Center, crossing the Rivanna on a new bridge, and reaching Route 20 near the Key West neighborhood.

Although Albemarle planner Wade says the Eastern Connector could help alleviate Free Bridge traffic, and although the city and county each recently split the cost of a half-million-dollar study, critics are already decrying the notion of a road through parkland.


Other approaches

One possible way to cross the Rivanna requiring little new asphalt would be a bridge from the end of Market Street to State Farm Boulevard. But if it were to carry cars, such a bridge would clearly run afoul of the Woolen Mills neighborhood, which has already shown its muscle by winning, on March 24, a $5.2 million smell-abatement plan from the nearby Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority.

Charlottesville Mayor David Norris says he can't support a Market-to-State Farm auto link. "It would bring more county through-traffic right through a city neighborhood," says Norris.

How about widening Free Bridge? Free Bridge was enlarged to seven lanes in 1992, according to VDOT spokesperson Lou Hatter, and more lanes might encourage even more through-city traffic, of which Norris is wary.

One option proposed on a local news blog by writer Karl Ackerman would be simply a boat on a wire. "That would allow you to pull yourself (and your bike) across," Ackerman writes on cvillenews.com. Calling it a "lower impact, lower cost alternative," Ackerman notes that such an option "could be fun."

Another option is improving public transportation to Pantops, which CTS director Bill Watterson says would be easier if plans to form a Charlottesville-Albemarle regional transit authority finalize.

"One of the special circumstances of the Martha Jefferson situation is that they're going to relocate from being in the city to Albemarle County," says Watterson, noting that Albemarle would bear the burden of the additional costs because it already funds the local contribution portion of CTS Route 10, which currently runs hourly from downtown to Pantops. According to Watterson, doubling the frequency might carry an upfront cost of $500,000-600,000, with an annual operating cost of about $250,000.

For residents to begin using public and alternative transportation, Salzman says, it must well marketed.

"Those of us who care, we have to get the people in the middle on board," says Salzman. "We have to show them ways that they can realistically get around."


Community impact

Peter Jefferson Place office park-- already home to a Hilton hotel and some multi-purpose office buildings-- is a rolling landscape, a site which the Martha Jefferson magazine extols as a "hospital built into a hill." While the 88-acre site will have over three miles of its own walking trails, the impending move of the 1,500-employee institution will put a particular strain on those who have grown accustomed to the living around the Locust Avenue site.

Nurse Mary O'Rorke currently foot-commutes about a mile, but she's unsure she'll continue if her only path requires Free Bridge. "I'm still interested in trying to walk," says O'Rorke, "but I want to be safe about it."

Sarah Peaslee, a resident of the Locust Grove neighborhood, works as a nurse at a UVA unit located at Martha Jefferson. She calls the move "elitist" and says money should be put towards staffing rather than toward a new location.

"I don't know how people are going to get to the new one," says Peaslee. (She might not have to fight Free Bridge commuter traffic in 2012 because she hopes to be retired by then.)

"The reality is there was no place to expand," says hospital V-P Cottrell of the old 13-acre site. And Martha Jefferson Cancer Center director Faye Satterly agrees.

"We don't have a choice," she says. "There's no place to go." Still, the move is inconvenient for employees.

"Part of the reason I found my neighborhood attractive is that I could walk to work," says Satterly, who currently covers the six-block distance on foot. She says she might still walk to the new site but admits that the uphill two-mile trek will require a lot more ambition.

"It's not Free Bridge that's the problem," she says. "It's the distance."

Maria Chapel, president of the Martha Jefferson Neighborhood Association, says hospital officials have met with residents to discuss plans for the current site. "They've been very good about keeping us in the loop," she says.

The precise fate of the Locust Avenue buildings has yet to be determined, according to Cottrell, but the site will likely be mixed-use, composed of residential, office, and retail buildings. The hospital is currently in the process of finding a redevelopment partner.

"It's 13 acres, and it's in our neighborhood, so no matter what happens it's going to have an impact," says Chapel.


Making changes

Despite all the fiscal and other hurdles, Salzman maintains that the hospital's move is a chance for Charlottesville and Albemarle citizens to think long-term about the impact of vehicular transportation.

"Americans are caught in asphalt lines," he says. And changing our transportation habits, he says, will have an impact far beyond Free Bridge. "This is a chance for us in Charlottesville for us to show the United States it can be done."

~

Third-year UVA student Laura Hoffman was an intern in the Hook newsroom this summer.

Rivanna: A wet and winding boundary


In addition to a City-favored plan to bridge the train tracks that divide McIntire Park, there are two competing visions for bridging the Rivanna-- not to mention the car-friendly Eastern Connector.
MAP BY ALLISON SOMERS


A County-commissioned study predicts a Martha Jefferson's relocation will generate an additional 22,600 trips per day on surrounding roads including already seven-laned Free Bridge, shown here.
PHOTO BY WILL WALKER


The non-profit hospital believed it was outgrowing this 13-acre site facing Locust Avenue.
PHOTO BY WILL WALKER


Already, some of MJH's 1,500 employees work on Pantops, at the Outpatient Care Center which opened in 2003.
PHOTO BY WILL WALKER


Salzman has grown frustrated with the use of federal Enhancement funds to prop up museums and tourist centers.Three options for putting a bridge to connect the City to the Pantops area of the County.
PHOTO BY JEN FARIELLO


Could this Grayson County steel truss bridge become Charlottesville's new pedestrian/bike way?
PHOTO COURTESY VDOT


Karl Ackerman envisions a boat tethered to a wire, something like the Hatton Ferry which has traversed the James River near Scottsville since 1870.
FILE PHOTO BY HAWES SPENCER

#

Comments

                     
common sense9/18/2008 9:41:43 AM

FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTY THREE DOLLARS PER FOOT TO BUILD A FOOT BRIDGE??????????

No wonder we are trillions in debt.

That price is absurd.

We are talking about 100k in cement and 200k in steel. 3.2million to figure it out and assemble it is a crime.

Randy Salzman9/18/2008 8:44:06 PM

While Ms. Hoffman did an excellent job with this article, there are aspects that didn't make the story that I'd like to expound on.

1) This is exactly the kind of project which gives Americans transportation options when a "carbon tax" is passed (as promoted by both presidential contenders) or when other "Peak Oil" or "Global Warming" measures begin to force Americans out of our cars. Congestion is NOT the only positive effect of having these kinds of substitutions for driving. Pollution and health are a couple of others.

2) Professors at UVA have expressed an interest in doing the research to determine those health, pollution and congestion effects if the hospital produces a creative TDM (transportation demand management) project which helps people decide to change transportation behavior - and have the substitutions to make that change.

3) Foundations, the Rockefeller nationally and Blue Moon, locally, have expressed interest in funding that creative TDM project because they know that the way TDM is done in America today is not working.

4) None of the other footbridge concepts referred to in the story have much transportation value. If one, for example, is in Pen Park, does one have a great desire to travel to another park? And even if one does, how often does someone go to Pen Park and then desire to go to Darden Towe on that exact day? Who would use any of those other bridges for regular transportation?

5) Conversely, Martha Jefferson has 1,500 employees and State Farm has 500 who daily need to arrive at work. When the Free Bridge closes up, some who live less than half a mile from the new MJH location will then drive west into the city center, go south on 5th Street, east on I-64, north on U.S. to 250 - a distance of ~10 miles to go less than half a mile. Due to the wear and tear on their cars - even if gasoline prices somehow decline - these people will begin to lobby for another car bridge.

6) Similarly, some employees who live further away could drive (or take bus) to Riverview Park and then walk across the footbridge to work, getting in their recommended daily 30 minutes of exercise as part of their commute while actually saving time because they will not be stuck in Free Bridge traffic.

7) Although I'm greatly in favor of better mass transit, buses to Pantops will be stuck as well in the Free Bridge traffic - and therefore negate the positive possibilities. Most routes today (and only 10 percent of the CTS budget comes from fares) run only once an hour. If you miss it, and you are an employee - say, a nurse - you are not just late. You are fired. Consequently, rather than chance the chance that you 1)make the bus and 2) it gets across the Free Bridge in time, you are more likely to consider using your muscles to get to work - which has multiple positive implications.

8) Martha Jefferson could - if it so desires - run an electric trolley from its old location to its new IF it can assure that the trolley isn't hung up in Free Bridge traffic, making employees late. Besides allowing the hospital to save money by utilizing some of its existing parking spaces, if an adequate footbridge (with electronically controllable stanchions) is built, emergency traffic like ambulances/fire/police would have a manner of bypassing the Free Bridge bottleneck.

9) And the Free Bridge is already a bottleneck twice a day. Building the Eastern Connector moves the bottleneck slightly (about a quarter mile) to the intersection of Route 20 and U.S. 250 but doesn't decrease the number of cars at all which need to get from inside Charlottesville to Pantops and vice versa. Even with the Eastern Connector, MJH and State Farm employees will get stuck in the U.S. 250 traffic at least once a day - just a quarter mile away from the Free Bridge.

10) Political leadership is often described as "figuring out which way the parade is going and getting in front." Until we, the people, form the parade which shows how to address global warming and peak oil, obesity, and our foreign policy need to import massive amounts of oil, the politicians - be they local, state or national - have no real incentive to "lead" with innovative solutions like this.

11) If the politicians build this bridge and promote it as transportation, they will have "political cover" when Free Bridge congestion (and/or peak oil and global warming) issues show up in the near future. salz

Kevin Cox9/19/2008 12:38:02 PM

This is a very impractical idea as a solution to congestion. This bridge will devour money that could be far more efficiently used. There are many more important transportation infrastructure needs to be funded. We need more sidewalks and bike lanes right now and there are plenty of people who will use them in town. There's only so much money though, so the work isn't getting done.

If this bridge is built (very unlikely) only a handful of people will use it to get to State Farm or MJH. By the way, where's the parking lot going to be for those who choose to drive to the bridge? There's nowhere to put it, except in the floodplain.

The exclusive use by MJH of a public bridge with a privately owned electric trolley is not going to happen.

I hope that the planners and government agencies involved in this reject the idea now so they can better use their time on projects and improvements that are effective. This is not one. It is an entertaining fantasy but totally impractical as a commuter route.

Justifying the construction of this bridge because it provides "political cover" is really strange.

Oh yeah, there may be changes ahead but the sky is not falling.

Cordially,

Kevin Cox

Lisa Pixley9/19/2008 3:24:23 PM

Hallelujah!!!

I use the Penn Park trail everyday and everyday I look at Dowden Towe across the river and wonder why the city has not thought to build a bridge to connect the trails and the two parks. It's so frustrating to actually have to drive to Dowden Towe! I've stopped going!

Are you kidding me??? For those nay sayers who can't understand the value of going to two parks in one day I suggest you get off your fat duffs and check out the gorgeous trails and parks this town has to offer. You build the bridge and they will come. This is not Charlottesville's version of 'The bridge to nowhere'. This is a much needed and visionary plan that will only inhance the quality of life for it's citizens and visitors. I hope that the goverment agencies and city planners have some cajones and go through with this plan.

Kevin Cox9/19/2008 3:48:48 PM

Lisa,

Mr. Towe's first name was Darden, not Dowden.

The article references different bridge proposals and different reasons for building them. The big question here is the cost. Right now the estimate is 3.5 million for the park to park bridge and the final cost would likely be much higher.

I run and walk on the Rivanna Trail regularly and I think a pedestrian bridge at Pen Park or Riverview would be cool and I would use it for fun. I still don't think it's a worthwhile use of that much money. Your desires and my fun are not sufficent justification. There are other, more pressing transportation needs that need funding. There's also plenty for Chris Gensic to do.

The proponent of the bridge at Riverview believes that the bridge will be a significant commuter route for people working at Martha Jefferson Hospital, State Farm Insurance and other businesses on Pantops Mountain. I think he's wrong. It would be fun to walk over though.

Cordially,

Kevin Cox

Egg McMuffin9/19/2008 6:05:51 PM

How the government can think that 3.5 millon for a foot bridge is even close to sane is beyond me.

Where the hell do they get these numbers and why doesn't somebody take the proposal and analyse it?

Rivanna Trail9/20/2008 6:19:01 AM

Mr. Cox:

Of course, there are other transportation needs but the writer of the article is talking about addressing one massive problem before it arrives – congestion on Free Bridge. Over the years, as the writer notes, many Martha Jefferson employees have moved into the city neighborhood south the hospital and these people will now need to drive to work – or trust very untrustworthy bus schedules. Providing them a way to continue to walk/bike (or begin to) is the point. Soliciting others to begin using their muscles to get to work is another point. With the likeliest future including Global Warming and/or Peak Oil effects on driving, we’re assuring continued pollution and outgo of funds to pay for gasoline because, without thinking like this, we’re hemming our area into having to drive extra distances to avoid massive congestion.

And, yes, you (and Lisa and…) could run across the bridge if you want. It would be part of the Rivanna Trail and would, therefore, be recreation as well as a transportation corridor. But Transportation Enhancement Funds are supposed to be spent to build non-motorized transportation and this bridge would provide that for potentially 2,000 employees daily. Some employees who live further away could bus to the park and some could drive – there are 40 spaces or so in Riverview Park – and then walk across the bridge. If the choice is to spend an hour stuck in traffic and pollute, 45 minutes to drive out of the way and pollute, or walk/bike 20-30 minutes for free without polluting, many will choose the option which benefits themselves and the community.

Kevin Cox9/20/2008 8:52:18 AM

How many people who work at MJH and State Farm live within a mile of their jobs right now? How many of those walk or bike to their jobs? I don't know but I will guess that it's not very many. If you can provide any real statistics that show that a lot people will walk or bike to and across the bridge at Riverview to their jobs than you may have an good argument for building the bridge. Guesses, dream and speculation don't count. You claim that potentially 2,000 employees will use the bridge daily. Have you even begun to imagine what transporting 2,000 people daily to Riverview Park would take? 40 spaces at the park isn't going to do much, and by the way where are the park users supposed to park after that? How many seats are there on a bus and how many buses will it require? 2,000 commuters on that bridge is laughable and will not happen.

I would also dispute your claim that CTS buses are very untrustworthy. With the exception of the trolley, which runs so frequently it hardly matters, the buses are pretty reliable. Plenty of people now rely on CTS to get them to their jobs on time daily and CTS does the job. Prove that they are "very untrustworthy."

It's interesting to note that Randy Salzman calls his dream a pedestrian bridge but yet wants it to be built large enough and strong enough to accomodate vehicles; electric shuttles and police and fire vehicles. If it is built to such standards it wouldn't take much for it to be enlarged to two lanes and turned into a legitimate vehicle bridge. Chesapeake Street and Market Street are not wide enough, and never will be to handle any more traffice than they have right now. Making either of those street wide enough would require lots of demolition and turn the street into a nightmare of vehicles like Park Street north of the bypass. Over my dead body! Bill Emory are you reading this?

I wonder if Randy Salzman is really trying to build an alternative to Free Bridge for cars. I live near Riverview Park and I certainly do not want more traffic in my neighborhood. My personal interests in my neighborhood are motivating me to take part in this discussion. Where does Randy Salzman live?

Cordially,

Kevin Cox

Zachary Shahan9/21/2008 6:12:33 PM

@Kevin Cox: You bring up some good points and concerns, but there are a couple of items I think it is important to respond to.

1) Whether the 2,000 commuter estimate is entirely correct is hard to know at this point. But the fact is, without this pedestrian/bicycle bridge it is extremely unlikely we could reach such a figure without dramatic macro-scale factors influencing large-scale modal change. It is knocking down hopeful, progressively minded projects such as these that kills any chance of United States transportation systems reaching beyond nearly complete auto orientation and auto dependence.

2) Randy Salzman is a dedicated bicyclist and pedestrian who is about as dedicated as anyone I have ever met in promoting muscle powered transportation as much and as effectively as possible. He has no hidden agenda and is dedicated to truly advancing bicycle and pedestrian transportation in the Charlottesville area and beyond. (I worked as the Executive Director of ACCT for about one year and met many dedicated people and he is near the very top of that list.) You may question other factors, but there is no question his intentions are as admirable as any -- and he has done A LOT of research on this topic.

Thanks,

Zachary Shahan

Kevin Cox9/21/2008 6:34:18 PM

As they say, "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."

There is plenty to do right now that will significantly enhance transportation alternatives but it is not getting done because of a lack of funding. There are basic needs for sidewalks, signals, additional enforcement and a host of other efforts and infrastructure. Spending time and money on this fantasy bridge diverts resources from those projects that make alternatives truly viable right now.

If Randy Salzman has done a lot of research then where is the data to support his claims? Where will the people park that take the electric shuttle? He says they'll park at Riverview Park. Has he asked the city parks department? Where is there any evidence that people will walk up the back of Pantops Mountain in any numbers to justify the cost of the bridge? Has MJH said they'll buy an electric shuttle? How many people now live within walking distance of MJH and actually do walk? Where do the employees of State Farm and MJH actually live? Show me the data.

salz9/23/2008 10:41:29 AM

For anyone interested in this concept, please contact the Woolen Mills Neighborhood Association.

I emailed both chairman offering to address any questions, thoughts, comments, etc. at one or more of the Woolen Mills neighborhood meeting.

salz

Kevin Cox9/23/2008 10:48:00 AM

Randy Salzman,

How about answering my questions right here?

Cordially,

Kevin Cox

Victoria Dunham9/24/2008 9:23:04 AM

Mr Salzman- I'm the WMNA president, and I've not received any communication from you regarding this issue. Do you have the correct contact info?

While we've not discussed it formally yet, I seriously doubt that our residents would want additional vehicular traffic in the Woolen Mills (i.e. park and ride). Some of our streets already have an over 74% cut-through rate (cars and commercial vehicles that do not belong to anyone in our neighborhood, or the next one over). We experience chronic problems with speeding and trash from these vehicles.

The Woolen Mills whole-heartedly supports pedestrians and cyclists however, and there have been many discussions over the years regarding a low-impact pedestrian bridge for recreational use. But, the emphasis is on low-impact here! It's important to note, however, that we've long been aware that some in the city and county governments have been pushing the idea of a bridge from Pantops into the city via our neighborhood in order to alleviate congestion on Free Bridge. That congestion is a result of the county's bad planning, it's their problem to fix, and it shouldn't involve pushing traffic onto the narrow residential streets of the Woolen Mills. So we'd approach any potential project with that firmly in mind.

salz9/24/2008 9:44:29 AM

Ms. Dunham:

I sent an email to you and Ms. Covert at the neighborhood association listed through the city's web site several days ago. Is that the correct email address?

Decreasing driving -- everywhere -- is exactly what I'm trying to do. Unfortunately, when the Free Bridge becomes overwhelmed, there will be huge political pressure to build another highway bridge over the Rivanna. One of the likely places is from State Farm Boulevard in the county to Market Street in the city which would, in my opinion, greatly injure the character of the Woolen Mills neighborhood.

The overall point is that IF WE ACT today, we can stop that political pressure by building, and promoting, a foot-bike bridge for transportation purposes and do it without bankrupting the city or county.

First Transportation Enhancement Grants are in the range of $50,000 for planning and seeking one this year allows time to address any and all issues to build what works the best to keep cars off our streets, and in the process, decrease pollution, global warming and America's incredible need to import oil.

All alternative transportation money is getting tighter every year because many communities are becoming aware that building alternatives have become crucial due to those three primary issues. The easy out -- "wait until next year" -- makes funding ever harder to get. But once a TEA planning grant is awarded, VDOT and Uncle Sam are invested and are more likely to fund construction of a project which can illustrate to other communities, through research and transportation demand management, other, more healthful, methods of getting around than immediately jumping into our personal vehicles.

I look forward to speaking with you and your neighborhood association.

Victoria Dunham9/24/2008 10:17:54 AM

Mr Salzman-

Nope, haven't received anything and Ms Covert is no longer n'hood prez. I'll contact the city, again, and request that they provide correct info.

I guess I'd have to say that our invitation to the party has arrived rather late. When considering a project that could have a rather large impact on a residential neighborhood, it's prudent to try and get them on board first, especially when that project seems to now be expanding to include vehicular traffic (trolleys, firetrucks).

The Woolen Mills will never allow a Market St bridge to be built. Period. It's utter insanity proposed by people like Ken Boyd, meant to fix a problem he helped create. Have you seen how narrow our streets are and how close to the street the houses are? We're about to become a state and national registered historic district, which will also have an impact on whether such a project would ever see the light of day.

A pedestrian bridge will need to stand solely on it's own merits, and not gain support via scare tactics. I personally think a pedestrian bridge is a wonderful idea, but once again, it would have to be low-impact.

Jay Neale9/30/2008 3:24:34 PM

OK, I'm late to the party, but maybe, just maybe someone is still cruising this post.

I am not here to argue the merits of the automobile. In one form or another, they are here to stay. Gas will dry up, electrics will have their time in the sun, and cold fusion will someday use banana peels to propel us forward – or something like that. The point is, like it or not, personal transportation is the keystone of our civilization and will be for years to come.

A footbridge for recreation is great – and someone should look at the ones VDOT maintains in Goshen – very cool cable designs that have been there for years.

I agree that Freebridge is a major bottle neck. The Eastern connector concept makes great sense for the north side of town, but the city will eventually need additional access to Pantops. I think everyone agrees that the Woolen Mills neighborhood should not be impacted – so now what? Here are my proposed solutions:

1: Build a connector from Peter Jefferson Parkway to Broadway Street. Initially, Carlton Ave beyond Carlton Rd. May need to be blocked to keep from flooding Belmont. Adding a connector from the end of Water St. beside the rail line to Carlton Rd would provide a path downtown. A final tie from the Water St connector to Broadway St would complete this option.

2. Somewhere around Grace St, branch off East High St, and cross the Rivanna. Then, curve around Pantops Shopping center and tie into S Pantops Drive.

It’s just a thought….

Elizabeth S12/12/2008 8:03:21 PM

I am a resident of Belmont. I work on Pantops (neither for State Farm nor Martha Jefferson) and walk to work occasionally. Walking over Free Bridge is a drag, especially when bikers use the sidewalks to avoid being smashed by vehicular traffic. I would welcome both Option A and Option B footbridges and would use them as much as possible. My car, left at home, would not clutter up Woolen Mills.

I have a hard time understanding what the big deal is about a parking lot or parking garage in the Woolen Mills neighborhood. Heck, if people are going to be walking this far to work anyhow, it's not like the parking needs to be plunked down directly onto the floodplain or in someone's backyard.


Your Name:
Your Email (optional):
Comment:
Word Count:
0
500 word limit
Image Verification:
Please type the letters above:
*  People say the darndest things, but language stronger than "darn," insulting words like "stupid," ethnically or racially disparaging language, and comparing people to Hitler usually results in deletion of the comment and may get you blocked from further commenting. Ditto for posting unverified and/or potentially libelous allegations, and even off-topic digression. And to avoid spam, any comment containing more than two weblinks gets eaten by Bigfoot.



© 2002-2010 Better Publications LLC - The Hook - 100 Second Street NW - Charlottesville, VA 22902 - 434-295-8700 (fax: 434-295-8097) :Login: