Hook Logo

Price drops 154K; NYT gets curious

by Hawes Spencer

It seems that the $695,000 Scottsville-area house for sale that appeared earlier this week in the New York Times is the $849,000 Scottsville-area house that Brevy Cannon wrote about in the Hook three years ago.

  • Grant July 20th, 2008 | 10:34 pm

    Well it does have slightly less acreage now. It never sold and that just goes to show how insane listing prices were during that time. Do not confuse listing price with market value.

  • Real C'ville - The Bubble Blog July 20th, 2008 | 11:52 pm

    Listing price and market “value” are so different nowadays that it’s as if the Seller’s math comes from Mars, and the Buyer’s comes from Mercury.

    And then there are some Realtors whose math seems to come from the Wild Blue Yonder when they state a Tax Assessment figure in a listing, as if this actually has anything to do with pricing a house in 2008….

  • Larry July 21st, 2008 | 9:50 am

    the semi-colon in the headline makes it seem like the reason the nytimes is ‘curious’ is due to the price drop.

    is the price drop really why the property is featured in the nyt? or is it b/c they were looking for something ‘representative’ in this area?

Leave a reply

Comments for this post will be closed on 18 August 2008.

Asides





login Contents ©2008 The HooK