Hook Logo

Recycle this! Van der Linde steps up tone

by Dave McNair
published 4:50pm Friday May 29, 2009
Bookmark and Share letter Write a letter to the editor

cover-murfCapturing the market: Peter Van der Linde’s recycling facility, which opened last December, is already handling over 250 tons of trash a day.

Recycling entrepreneur Peter Van der Linde, who opened an $11 million state-of-the-art recycling facility in Zion Crossroads last December, recently did a round of local radio interviews, drawing attention once again to his ongoing legal battle with the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority, which has filed a $3.5 million lawsuit against him.

“If this doesn’t bother you, nothing will,” declared former Republican City Councilor Rob Schilling on his WINA radio program, saying he was “disgusted” by the Authority’s action against Van der Linde. “It’s wrong in every single way.”

After having toured Van der Linde’s facility, Schilling told listeners he was “awestruck” by the operation, which can sort up to 100 tons of construction and demolition debris and curbside recyclables per hour.

As detailed in the Hook [What a Waste: Is the trash Authority going obsolete?], the 100,000 square-foot facility has a $3.2 million state-of-the-art machine that separates recyclables from the trash stream. Because Van der Linde’s tipping fees are lower than the Authority’s, and because his facility does all the separating, local haulers have flocked.

In early April, the facility was handling 250 tons a day, or 7,500 tons per month, and Van der Linde says that number is climbing. In a few months, a second machine capable of recycling household garbage will be operational, which could spell doom for the Authority.

As the Authority announced on April 27, revenues at the Ivy transfer station have dropped 11 percent, and at the Zion Crossroads station, which happens to be right beside Van der Linde’s facility, revenues have dropped 44 percent. In addition, the authority’s recycling revenues have dropped by 47 percent.

As a result, the Authority has moved to eliminate enough part-timers to equal two full-time positions at the McIntire Recycling Center and close the facility on Mondays. The quasi-governmental entity has also recently dipped into its own cash reserves, withdrawing an extra $100,000 to cover expenses.

Meanwhile, the Authority is continuing to pursue the lawsuit it filed against Van der Linde in January 2008, which was first brought to the public’s attention in a Hook cover story [What a Waste: Is the trash Authority going obsolete?], as the Authority had kept their actions secret from its own citizens advisory board, Charlottesville City Council, and the Albemarle Board of Supervisors. The lawsuit claims that Van der Linde’s drivers for his decade-old dumpster business systematically lied about the origins of their trash at a time when Van der Linde’s company still used the Authority’s Zion Crossroads transfer station, thereby avoiding a $16 “service contribution fee,” a charge that has kept the Authority afloat financially ever since the Ivy landfill was closed in 2001.

Van der Linde calls the lawsuit “absurd,” given the fact that he would have had to convince all his drivers to go along with the scheme, that Allied Waste, the owner of the Zion Crossroads transfer station, actually charges more for out-of-district waste, and that the tipping station’s attendants rarely asked about trash origins anyway. In fact, Van der Linde says, he has hours of video and audio tape, taken by a private investigator he hired, showing that attendants at the station rarely asked.

What’s more, as revealed in a Hook story [Wasted revenue? Authority realized in 2005 station didn’t track origins], the Authority discovered in 2005, seven years after the deal with Allied and their Zion transfer station was made, that Allied employees were “completely unaware” of their duty to collect the $16 “service contribution fee” that the RSWA is claiming Van der Linde conspired to avoid, an oversight that may have cost the RSWA million in lost revenue. Authority officials have yet to aknowledged the oversight publically.

Authority officials have long refused to comment on the lawsuit, and have continued to keep local government officials in the dark. County supervisor Ken Boyd, who was recently appointed to the Authority’s board, says he has yet to be briefed on the lawsuit. Fellow supervisor Dennis Rooker also admits to knowing nothing about the lawsuit, saying it was not something that was ever discussed.

“I’m asking to be brought up to date,” says Boyd, “but can’t really comment now, and may not even after I have the facts depending on the status of the legal action.”

Meanwhile, supervisor Sally Thomas, although she says she commends Van der Linde’s recycling effort, appears to support the Authority’s actions.

“The rest of us, who don’t have the ability to escape the fees, should be glad that the Authority is making sure large hauling companies are not escaping without paying,” says Thomas. “This suit was filed before that operation started and involves charges that full payment was being avoided.”

Authority director Tom Frederick did not return the Hook’s call for comment, but in a prepared statement released this week the Authority finally broke their silence on the lawsuit, calling Van der Linde’s radio appearances “inappropriate” and urging the public “not to pre-judge the case” on the basis of his comments.

“Evidence obtained by the Authority to date supports a claim that Container Rentals and
Mr. van der Linde have deprived the Authority of revenue in the form of service contribution fees lawfully due to it,” says Frederick. “The Authority believes it is entirely appropriate to enforce its rights to revenue due it rather than resorting to taxpayer funds, and the Authority will continue to press its claim.”

Just recently, Van der Linde says the Authority served 42 of his employees and customers with subpoenas to testify in the case against him. The lawsuit, which is expected to culminate in a four-day jury trial in the Spring of 2010, could cost the Authority nearly $400,000. And quite possibly some embarrassment.

“They’re not going to go quietly into that good-night, are they?,” asked WINA’s Coy Barefoot, who interviewed Van der Linde on his radio program May 21, alluding to the ongoing lawsuit and the Authority’s financial problems in the face of Van der Linde’s operation.

“No, they’re going to go kicking and screaming,” replied Van der Linde, ” but it’s an exercise in futility.”

“It’s an attack on a private citizen, funded by tax-payer money,” intoned Schilling, calling the lawsuit “frivolous” and challenging his listeners to press city and county officials to “lay the heck off Van der Linde recycling.”

“No credit to me,” says Van der Linde, speaking of his recycling facility, “it’s just a better mouse trap. It’s the horse and buggy giving way to the motor car.”

In his radio appearences, Van der Linde suggested that the Authority is continuing to pursue its lawsuit against him because his business is a threat to them financially, but Frederick took issue with that notion, saying the lawsuit was “in no way related” to Van der Linde’s current recycling operation. The lawsuit, says Frederick, “is strictly about enforcing the Authority’s right to funds owed to it over the past several years.”

“When the facts of the lawsuit are available to the public,” Frederick continues, “the public will see the issue in a much different way than is currently being presented by Mr. van der Linde.”

Ironically, by the time the Authority’s lawsuit against Van der Linde goes to court, the Authority could land in a precarious financial position.

As Frederick has stated publicly on several occasions, absent sufficient waste volume, both a service contribution fee and the “free” programs it supports (e.g., McIntire Recycling Center) would be unsustainable. In addition, the City’s waste agreement with the RSWA expires at the end of June next year, at which time the City could decide to part ways with the Authority.

Steve Lawson, head of Charlottesville’s public service, told the Hook recently, “Right now, we have two collection contracts, but we could potentially have one,” referring to Van der Linde’s operation. “We need to take a look at that.”

As for the County, Van der Linde, on Barefoot’s show, reiterated his long-standing offer to supply recycling containers without charge to the County and its citizens, replacing what he calls the outdated “McIntire Model,” which is the now-curtailed McIntire Recycling Center.

“I can do twenty McIntire’s,” says Van der Linde, describing how his containers could be placed at many different locations and could accept all kinds of trash— not just bottles, cans, and paper. Plus, there would be no need for people to separate their recyclables.

“They would be open twenty-four-seven, require no staff, no separating, and would be absolutely free to the County. I’ve pitched this ’till the cows come home, but nobody is listening.”

Updated June 1, 2009 1:07pm

Download files »

  • http://avenue.org/rswa/Agendas/agenda_may18_2009_doc2a.pdf


  • jeff May 29th, 2009 | 8:08 pm

    What kind of elected officials do we have that would condone this ?
    The Hook first published an article about this in early April and they are still playing dumb or supportive. This is hundreds of thousands of dollars that they’re throwing away. I agree with Schilling this is an outrage and we have to get some new blood on the Board of Supervisors and City Council that wouldn’t put up with wasting tax payer dollars and will put an end to this.

  • stew May 30th, 2009 | 3:39 pm

    I agree with Jeff. the absurdities keep mounting: the overblown, irresponsibly expensive water “plan,” the outdated and backward looking “parkway”, and now this. Until we demand better, we deserve what we get:pathetic leadership, incompetent management, and dubious distribution of resources. these “Quasi-Governmental” agencies that have been handed the reins of our infrastructure are bleeding us dry.

  • Sue May 30th, 2009 | 5:28 pm

    “Quasi-Governmental” agencies that have been handed the reins of our infrastructure are bleeding us dry.” Excellent synopsis of the situation. First they throw out the water plan we have in 2002, double our rates –spend over 5 million on consultants and not a drop of additional water for the community and now this waste fiasco. We need some elected officials to get off their chairs and demand a change ! Instead of all new infrastructure, so they can hide their incompetence, they should be maintaining the investment in the infrastructure we already have at a far lesser cost to the citizens.

  • Cville Eye May 30th, 2009 | 9:15 pm

    How can an AUTHORITY charge for a service it is not providing?
    If the City of New York starts its own airline that runs from NY to Miami and charges $44, can it force USAir to charge $60 and turn over $16 to the NY airline because the passengers originated in NY? Will the new regional transportation AUTHORITY require the cab companies to pay a “service contribution fee?”
    “As the Authority announced on April 27, revenues at the Ivy transfer station have dropped 11 percent, and at the Zion Crossroads station, which happens to be right beside Van der Linde’s facility, revenues have dropped 44 percent. In addition, the authority’s recycling revenues have dropped by 47 percent.” Isn’t it funny how AUTHORITIES can be unsuccessful but yet can use their quasi-governmental status to not only compete with private enterprise (”…pointing out that the Authority’s plan for its own Van der Linde-like recycling facility…”) but also try to run a successful enterprise out of business? I agree with Rob Schilling that the AUTHORITY has run amok.

  • Cville Eye May 30th, 2009 | 9:17 pm

    Now that Ken Boyd and Dave Norris are on the board, I wonder how long will it take them publicly to weigh-in.

  • CC May 30th, 2009 | 10:42 pm

    Cville Eye, where is there mention of an Authority charging for a service not provided? The $16 mentioned in the article is for taking a dump truck full of trash. It isn’t like dealing with that trash is free. I may misunderstand your general position on these matters, but I would think you would be more supportive of a fee that charges actual users than of a general tax that would affect people no matter how much of that service they use. I’m very much in favor of letting Mr. Van der Linde do his business in peace and this is situation is more proof that both of our local governments are seriously screwed up, but I’m just not seeing your point there.

  • Cville Eye May 30th, 2009 | 11:27 pm

    The city (RSWA) is not collecting and hauling the trash to Zion Crossroads, Allied (a private company) is. Allied can charge what it wants but it shouldn’t have to give RSWA a part of the proceeds.
    “In 2005, seven years after the RSWA inked a deal with a firm called Allied Waste (then BFI and now part of a publicly held company called Republic Services) to send area waste to Allied’s waste station in Zion Crossroads, RSWA officials learned that Allied employees were “completely unaware” of their duty to collect a $16 “service contribution fee” for the Authority every time in-district (i.e. Charlottesville and Albemarle) waste crossed company scales.” http://readthehook.com/blog/index.php/2009/04/20/wasted-revenue-authority-realized-in-2005-station-didnt-track-origins/
    Private trash haulers who take their in-district directly to Allied at Zion Crossroads pays this fee to Allied and Allied sends it to RSWA. Allied gets to keep the rest of the $60+/ton fee.

  • Jeff May 31st, 2009 | 7:05 am

    CvilleEye, totally agree with your comments –one correction it’s Ken Boyd and David Brown on the board. Doubtful that the elected officials, anymore than Holly Edwards and Sally Thomas on the water board, will make a difference in the incompetence we have seen both in the water and waste situation. Still think we need to get rid of the entire board and start over with a board elected totally by the rate payers. Eventually, I’m confident, people will have been bilked enough and this will happen.

    Saw a sign yesterday “dredge baby dredge” on the back of someone’s car– people are catching on

  • Stan May 31st, 2009 | 7:37 am

    I’d be pissed also if some guy came in and started messing with my Sopranoesque Skip. $16 per ton for doing nothing. Damn, I am in the wrong business

  • Cville Eye May 31st, 2009 | 11:46 am

    Sorry on Brown,Norris. I must be in deep denial.

  • County Lass May 31st, 2009 | 5:41 pm

    Where can we get those bumper stickers that say ‘Dredge Baby Dredge”?

  • Big Dog June 1st, 2009 | 11:38 pm

    Peter van der Linde is a godsend to the community.If only we could replicate him to run the city, too.

  • Concerned Troy Residents June 4th, 2009 | 10:41 am

    I am thankful that Fluvanna County has taken those big, orange, ugly, and loud haulers off of Route 250, west of Zions Crossroads. This is per a condition added to the SUP that allows them to accept a larger tonage of materials. As you can see, and we have discussed previously, they don’t have any business on Route 250, west of Zions Crossroads or on any secondary roads. I haven’t seen ANY on the road since. My next concern is with the new, additional, large trucks that will be using this facility due to possible expansion of residental trash and recycling. They will probably travel Route 250 in Fluvanna County exclusively. Unfortunately, the SUP doesn’t include non-Vanderlinde owned vehicles. I wish this would have been added also. Plus, I wonder if Van der Linde would allow a Fluvanna County resident to drive up and pay a fee to dump trash from their own truck or vehicle? BFI promised they would allow this when they approved but resinded after approval. It sure would be nice for them to provide service to Fluvanna County residents not just City and Albemarle County residents.

  • Waste Wars « David McNair June 16th, 2009 | 12:41 pm

    [...] by the Authority’s action against Van der Linde. “It’s wrong in every single way.” (More) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Welcome [...]

  • [...] for (var i=0; i possibly related content:Don Van der Linde? Wasteworks whacks recycler with RICORecycle this! Van der Linde steps up toneWaste Authority says: Lawsuit ends when Van der Linde paysBlow to the flow? RSWA, Boyd distancing [...]

Leave a reply

* People say the darndest things, but if you use language stronger than "darn," ethnically or racially disparaging language, or compare people to Hitler, you may find that we've deleted the comment and/or blocked you from further commenting. Ditto for most unverified information, gross insults, potentially libelous statements, and veering off the topic. To avoid spam, all comments containing more than two weblinks are placed into a holding tank.

Comments for this post will be closed on 4 February 2010.

login | Contents ©2009 The HooK