Hook Logo

Waterlogged: Criticized pool pass pricing sunk

by Gordon Block
letter Write a letter to the editor

news-poolprice-crop-medSwimmers at Crow Pool enjoy a water aerobics class.
PHOTO BY GORDON BLOCK

Splashing in the deep end of bad publicity, the city of Charlottesville has formally ended a pricing plan on summer pool passes that charged more to students going to private schools.

Following the pricing change, the City’s acting parks director, Brian Daly, defended the original policy and denies that public scrutiny led to the change.

“The whole point of having this rate was to be as inclusive as possible,” Daly says. Daly explains the city’s primary concern was ensuring that the poorest students in Charlottesville would be able to afford summer swim passes. Though he admits being aware of some controversy around the pricing, he says he never personally heard any complaints, and didn’t clarify when asked what prompted his department to “broaden” its policy.

The City’s website now defines a Charlottesville City Student as “any student (excluding college students) that has residency within the city of Charlottesville.”

The original pricing would have had public school students in grades K-12 paying $20 for a summer pass, with private school students over 48 inches (a height some children reach in kindergarten) paying a pre-season price of $39, the same rate as adults and nearly double the fee for their public school counterparts.

The pricing disparity created an uproar, with former Republican city councilor and current radio talk show host Rob Schilling raging about the policy on his blog and claiming that the pricing structure was the city’s way to “punish” families who send their children to private schools.

Daly insists that Schilling’s reaction was uncommon.

“Most people are very excited,” says Daly, who estimates that more than 800 passes have been sold for the summer. The total capacity for both outdoor pools is 525 swimmers (300 at Washington Park; 225 at the new Onesty pool at Meade Park). And Daly maintains that even the original pricing gave every city resident a “significant discount,” compared to the $79 charged to non-resident swimmers over 48 inches.

“We were trying to provide a rate for those whose income might be a barrier,” Daly says. “We want kids in the pool.”

Schilling says he’s happy to see the change in policy.

“They did what was right. They were doing what was wrong, and they changed it,” he says. “Once it was brought to light,” he adds, seeming to take credit for the change in policy, “they had no choice but to react.”

But just correcting the pricing structure doesn’t go quite far enough in his Schilling’s opinion. “Whoever came up with that idea in the first place,” he says, “should be fired.”

The city has extended its preseason sale prices until June 20, around the expected opening of Onesty pool. The passes can be purchased at the Washington Park pool, Crow pool, or in the City Hall Annex.

letter Write a letter to the editor

  • tater salad June 11th, 2009 | 10:17 am

    Perhaps the city should reimburse the parents of private schools for all of the money they DON”T have to spend on those kids. Then thge double charge would be fair.

  • TortFeezer June 11th, 2009 | 2:10 pm

    You know, generally the GOP is just a bunch of ranting hypocritical nonsense, so I ignore them.

    But this policy frankly shocks me: Parents of private school kids pay taxes, and those taxes build the public pools, so their kids should be charged the same rate. Frankly, as it is, 20 bucks is a give away. Even at 35 a head for the entire summer, everyone is getting their tax money’s worth.

  • Cville Eye June 11th, 2009 | 7:39 pm

    Oh good, another City employee you can’t believe.

  • Sick Of The Local Rambos June 11th, 2009 | 8:21 pm

    Cville Eye, this scares me. You and I are agreeing way too much lately.

  • plop June 13th, 2009 | 6:16 pm

    The city messed up BIG TIME!

  • TJ June 13th, 2009 | 7:12 pm

    Does anyone see a pattern here. Our city manager gets awards for this and that from far away places. In the meantime these mis-steps keep happening. They make the Council look incompetent as well as the staff. If I were them I would be very upset about so many errors in judgment.

  • Cville Eye June 13th, 2009 | 7:15 pm

    @TJ, hopefully the City Manager will not be with us much longer. I wonder if he’s being paid for his work with Virginia First Cities.

  • Sick Of The Local Rambos June 13th, 2009 | 11:11 pm

    CVille Eye, in reference to the city retirement system, each year an employee hangs in there, his/her monthly retirement check is enhanced. If a retirement check might be $15,000 a month in 2009, it could very well be $15,750 in 2010. Or $16,500 in 2011. Or $18,000 in 2012. If still in good health, long timers have no real incentive to step aside or retire just for the sake of doing so. The longer they work, the larger their retirement check is.

    If O’Connell himself is on city retirement (??), don’t count on his going anywhere in the near future. Enhanced retirement checks, health insurance, life insurance, other benefits, take home vehicle to use anytime he likes…. nope, don’t count on his going anywhere anytime soon. :)

  • Cville Eye June 13th, 2009 | 11:39 pm

    Inspite of all of that, O’Connell may leave before he’s asked to leave. I am well aware that the City offers the best retirement package for city employees of any locality in the State and even the State itself.

Leave a reply

* People say the darndest things, but if they use language stronger than "darn," if they use ethnically or racially disparaging language, or start comparing people to Hitler, they may find that we've deleted the comment. Ditto for most unverified information, potentially libelous statements, and anything off the topic. To avoid spam, all comments containing more than one URL/weblink are placed into a holding tank for administrator approval.

Comments for this post will be closed on 11 July 2009.

Asides

Categories

Archives

login Contents ©2008 The HooK