Hook Logo

Growth industry: UVA, MJH ready for the morbidly obese

by Lisa Provence
published 3:32pm Friday Aug 27, 2010
Bookmark and Share letter Write a letter to the editor

news-michelle-herefordAt UVA’s new Transitional Care Hospital, Michelle Hereford stands under a ceiling-mounted lift that can transport obese patients from bed to bathroom.
PHOTO BY LISA PROVENCE

UVA’s newest hospital building acknowledges a cruel fact of life: Americans are getting fatter— much fatter. At the swanky new Ivy Road facility designed for long-term acute care, 11 of the 40 rooms can handle patients weighing up to 1,000 pounds, thanks to heavy-duty beds and overhead electric lifts.

“It is very innovative,” says Michelle Hereford, associate chief at UVA’s new Transitional Care Hospital. “It decreases injuries and helps with patients being mobile.”

On a reporter’s recent tour of one of the so-called “bariatric” patient rooms, it’s evident that the room is bigger than usual. So are the beds, which are reinforced and capable of holding patients who might qualify for the record books.

Overhead, a monorail-like ribbon of steel snakes across the ceiling. That’s the track for the  Pinnacle brand overhead lift, an electric winch-equipped device that can lift a half-ton patient out of bed and all the way to the bathroom.

Bariatric medicine is booming locally. An estimated 20 to 24 percent of adults in Virginia are obese, according to the Martha Jefferson Bariatric Center, whose website, when one is searching the term “obesity health risk,” currently pops up first under sponsored results.

“We already offer bariatric services,” says Martha Jefferson spokeswoman Jenn McDaniel. “At the new hospital, all of our rooms are designed to accommodate bariatric patients.”

Slated to open next year at Peter Jefferson Place, Martha Jeff’s new facility will feature extra-wide doors on all bathrooms and in all patient rooms, and all the beds will hold up to 500 pounds.

“Thousand-pound patients are few and far between for us,” explains McDaniel. “We will rent those beds if we need them on a case-by-case basis.”

And unlike UVA’s Transitional Care Hospital, Martha Jeff opted not to install overhead lifts.

“Our team looked at those and found that most patients don’t fall between the bed and bathroom,” says McDaniel. “They fall in the bathroom or in the hall. We’ll have portable lifts if they need help getting onto machines like MRIs, or between the bed and bathroom if needed.”

The two Charlottesville medical centers are not alone. Large patients appear to be fueling a national growth industry.

“Look at the data,” says McDaniel. “Overall, Americans are getting larger.”

A recent Center for Disease Control Foundation study published in the July 27 issue of Health Affairs pegs the cost of obesity health care in the United States as high as $147 billion, double what it was a decade ago, with half the costs covered by the federal government through Medicare and Medicaid.

James Zervios, spokesman for the Obesity Action Coalition, thinks focusing on what the taxpayer pays is unfair.

“Someone who smokes and gets lung cancer, we don’t say my tax dollars shouldn’t pay for care,” he says. “Someone who sunbathes and gets skin cancer, we don’t say we shouldn’t pay.”

With 93 million Americans affected by obesity, bariatric facilities at hospitals are long overdue, says Zervios, because the care of some large patients is hampered by outmoded equipment.

“We’ve experienced it a lot with hospitals who can’t handle someone of size,” he explains, noting that ambulances also need special equipment to properly transport extremely obese patients.

The injury risks of obesity aren’t limited to obese people. Nursing aides, orderlies, and attendants reported 24,340 back injuries in 2007, the second highest of all occupations, while registered nurses ranked seventh with 8,580 cases, according to Katherine Cox at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

While patient weight wasn’t tracked in those numbers, Cox says she wouldn’t be surprised if injury rates climb with the weight of the patient, and she points to legislation sponsored by Minnesota Senator Al Franken, the Safe Patient Handling Bill, that would mandate patient lift equipment.

“It’s a huge issue we’ve been working on for a number of years,” says Cox. “We’d say back injuries among health care workers is epidemic.”

Cox praises new facilities like UVA’s and Martha Jefferson’s for providing infrastructure to reduce such injuries.

“The problem for some of the older hospitals is that it’s not doable,” explains Cox. “Think of the weight. You don’t want to pull down ceiling tiles.”

At UVA’s Transitional Care Hospital, the innovations don’t stop with the heavy lifting. The facility is primarily designed for weaning patients off ventilators at a cost far cheaper than an ICU. The rooms have their own bedside monitors, in-wall oxygen supplies, and some rooms are pre-plumbed for dialysis.

“It’s very innovative,” Hereford reiterates. “And,” she adds, “patients don’t have to be obese to use this equipment.”

10 comments

  • Angel Eyes August 27th, 2010 | 4:13 pm

    The need for such a facility is gross and must seem truly bizarre to people in the rest of the world.

  • Michael 2 August 27th, 2010 | 4:19 pm

    Last time I was in MJH, I was shocked at how obese some of the staff were. If hospital employees can’t maintain a health weight, then doesn’t that say something about the hospital?

  • Chuck Bartowski August 27th, 2010 | 4:29 pm

    Anybody know when this new UVA LTAC hospital will be up and running? Is it up and running already? Sorry if I missed that in the article.

  • Antrim August 28th, 2010 | 7:15 am

    “primarily designed for weaning patients off ventilators…”

    Right. Primarily designed for raping the insurance co’s, Medicare, and taxpayers, as the patients and families wait for inevitable infections, mishaps, and progressive deterioration.
    It’s medical fraud.

  • Col. Forbin August 28th, 2010 | 11:01 am

    Good news, Fluvanna!

  • Chris August 28th, 2010 | 11:36 am

    @ Michael 2 - No, it doesn’t say anything about the hospital. Yes, some of the staff is obese; and, some of them are phenomenal clinicians.

    @ Antrim - Also, no. I think I gather from your post that you think once someone is on a ventilator that we should conclude that something will kill them and end it quickly? Or is it that we should never put someone on a ventilator in the first place? Or do you simply have a problem with weaning someone off of a ventilator? I’m confused.

    Being able to get someone who is on a ventilator out of the ICU, away from patients who are more sick and potentially more able to spread an infection is a great idea. Being able to have a team who spends all day weaning people off a ventilator will reduce problems. Patients will do better, it will cost less…how is that not something we should do?

    Lastly, “raping the insurance co.’s?” You feel like this is a serious problem?

  • Caesonia August 28th, 2010 | 12:42 pm

    Sometimes overweight people have better health than those whoa re thin. Genes aren’t very fair. But we definitely need to do something about the morbidly obese.

    Developing our cities and existence so that they are more oriented towards pedestrian activity and less towards the big box store for anything would be a big start. Having large places to buy items in bulk, or to buy tings like appliances, which you don’t need that often is understandable. But people should be able to get a lot of their items fresh on a routine basis without having to drive all the time.

    Every neighborhood should have a selection of small businesses within a few blocks to meet those needs.

    Of course, that’s ant- American anti-county, I know, but that’s really the only way to change the trend.

    There ARE fat people in other countries, certainly in Europe, but they at least tend to get more exercise.

  • bullet tooth tony August 28th, 2010 | 4:37 pm

    The food does not jump from the macdonalds bag to the mouth, the eager hand moves it there.

  • Antrim August 29th, 2010 | 12:43 pm

    Chris,
    Just happened back to The Hook again….. Yes, raping the insurance Co’s and bill-payors is a huge problem.
    “Raping” was a poor word choice. Doctors and hospital systems identify a huge revenue source, like the climbing number of chronic lung sufferers, and adopt “treatment” protocols and fictitious goals to exploit these populations. Fair enough?
    No. Left over, scarce medical resources to treat and prevent the maladies with HIGH probability of good outcomes are poorly implemented and poorly funded. And the young, without the power to exert healthy choices, become the next generation of cash cows to this system.
    Oh yeah, and the nurses are there to rubber-stamp their employers’ priorities.
    As for your take on the benefits of segregating these chronic lung patients…yes, they’re going to live longer, in and out of this facility, just like the payors require. Not worth the downsides.
    Oh, to hell with this.

  • Jeff D August 29th, 2010 | 1:51 pm

    Free advice: Don’t eat food, and you will lose weight.

    Next red-hot topic (while the rest of us starve).

Leave a reply

* People say the darndest things, but language stronger than "darn," insulting words like "stupid," ethnically or racially disparaging language, and comparing people to Hitler usually results in deletion of the comment and may get you blocked from further commenting. Ditto for posting unverified and/or potentially libelous allegations, and even off-topic digression. And to avoid spam, any comment containing more than two weblinks gets eaten by Bigfoot.

Comments for this post will be closed on 26 September 2010.

login | Contents ©2009 The HooK