Hook Logo

Going Down: 220 South Street

by Dave McNair
letter Write a letter to the editor

Despite developer Oliver Kuttner’s offer to buy and move the building next door, the Blue Moon Fund plans to demolish some rare affordable housing downtown to make room for a conference center. A demo permit was filed with the city today. Last year, a representative of the Fund, which counts supporting new approaches to urban development to “improve the human condition” as one of its initiatives, justified the demo by saying the existing building was energy inefficient and that the Fund didn’t want to “perpetuate that kind of construction.”

letter Write a letter to the editor

  • reality March 2nd, 2009 | 6:05 pm

    good for them. not every home needs to be saved, not everything old is an antique

  • Poodle March 2nd, 2009 | 7:15 pm

    Aren’t there plenty of empty existing structures downtown that could be turned into a conference center?

    I find it hard to believe the loss of affordable housing is worth it.

  • chris March 2nd, 2009 | 7:43 pm

    Isn’t it gone already?

  • Cville Eye March 3rd, 2009 | 10:27 am

    Wasn’t this apartment building erected in the eighties or nineties?

  • Jeff S. March 3rd, 2009 | 11:46 am

    “Plans to demolish”? Actually, it was reduced to kindling several weeks ago. The only thing left on the site now is wood chips.

    I was a tenant there for a spell; it was affordable (relative to Charlottesville’s above-average rental rates) but had a number of disadvantages. Foremost was its proximity to the railroad tracks - the house shook when the trains passed by, which was often.

    And while I agree with the Blue Moon Fund that energy efficiency was an issue, retrofitting to improve the insulation would be a lot more environmentally friendly than demolition. By not at least trying to re-use some of the building materials they are “perpetuating” our disposable society. Wag of the finger, Blue Moon Fund!

  • Seriously March 3rd, 2009 | 12:06 pm

    The Blue Moon Fund doesn’t care what what anyone thinks. You might as well be wagging your finger at the side of a mountain. That building lacked the bling-bling they wanted. They want a show-off project, and that place was far too humble. It will take a much larger building to contain all that hot air and high-fiving.

    Of course, if they practiced what they preach, then they would have either improved the existing building or built somewhere else, and not added additional scrap to the landfill.

    The Fund does good work, but the superior holier-than-thou attitude of many of those involved is laughable.

  • edgar allen hoe March 3rd, 2009 | 12:24 pm

    Being a disposable society creates jobs and putting non toxic crap in a landfill. covering it with dirt and planting trees doesn’t hurt the environment.

  • Cville Eye March 3rd, 2009 | 1:18 pm

    I doubt if anyone would characterize the Blue Moon Fund as a significant provider of employment. The question is why would they try to convert a two-story apartment building to a conference center?

  • phonypony March 3rd, 2009 | 2:02 pm

    didn’t the Monticello Conference Center (or whatever that warehouse down the hill from the Fire Station was called) close for lack of bookings just recently?

    The fact that they are trying to put a green spin on it is a joke.

  • Cville Eye March 3rd, 2009 | 2:12 pm

    That conference center was a private enterprise. With the clout that the Blue Moon Fund has on city council, I’m sure it won’t be huring for tax money. It’s pet project, the Charlottesville Community Design Center, receives a lot of funds each year.

  • [...] A comic actor and husband of former Charlottesvillian Savitri Durkee is running for mayor of New York against Michael Bloomberg. The Reverend Billy of The Church of Stop Shopping, an anti-consumerism organization, takes his anti-consumerism on a quest toward Gracie Mansion, according to the New York Times. (0) Going Down: 220 South Street [...]

Leave a reply

* People say the darndest things, but if they use language stronger than "darn," if they use ethnically or racially disparaging language, or start comparing people to Hitler, they may find that we've deleted the comment. Ditto for most unverified information, potentially libelous statements, and anything off the topic. To avoid spam, all comments containing more than one URL/weblink are placed into a holding tank for administrator approval.

Comments for this post will be closed on 1 April 2009.

Asides

Categories

Archives

login Contents ©2008 The HooK